Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T08:17:14.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Do Behavioral Biases Vary across Individuals? Evidence from Individual Level 401(k) Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Julie R. Agnew
Affiliation:
julie.agnew@mason.wm.edu, The College of William and Mary, Mason School of Business Administration, PO Box 8795, Williamsburg, VA 23187.

Abstract

This paper investigates whether some individuals are prone to behavioral biases in their 401(k) investments. Using demographic data and allocation information for over 73,000 employees, I examine two allocation biases and a participation bias. The findings suggest that higher salaried employees tend to make significantly better choices. Participants who earn $100, 000 hold 12. 7% less in company stock, are 3% less likely to follow the framing 1/n heuristic, and are 37.7% more likely to participate than those earning $46, 000. Women make better choices in two of the three cases and I find evidence of mental accounting.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnew, J.; Balduzzi, P.; and Sunden, A.. “Portfolio Choice and Trading in a Large 401(k) Plan.” American Economic Review, 93 (2003), 193215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, B. M., and Odean, T.. “Boys Will Be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116 (2001), 261292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benartzi, S.Excessive Extrapolation and the Allocation of 401(k) Accounts to Company Stock.” Journal of Finance, 56 (2001), 17471764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benartzi, S., and Thaler, R.. “Naive Diversification Strategies in Retirement Saving Plans.” American Economic Review, 91 (2001), 7998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettis, J. C.; Bizjak, J.; and Lemmon, M.. “Managerial Ownership, Incentive Contracting, and the Use of Zero-Cost Collars and Equity Swaps by Corporate Insiders.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36 (2001), 345370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodie, Z.; Merton, R. C.; and Samuelson, W. F.. Labor Supply Flexibility and Portfolio Choice in a Life Cycle Model.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 16 (1992), 427449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brav, A.; Constantinides, G. M.; and Geczy, C. C.. “Asset Pricing with Heterogeneous Consumers and Limited Participation: Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Political Economy, 110 (2002), 793824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, J. J.; Laibson, D.; Madrian, B.; and Metrick, A.. “Defined Contribution Pensions: Plan Rules, Participant Decisions and the Path of Least Resistance.” NBER Working Paper 8655 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, J. J.; Laibson, D.,; Madrian, B.; and Metrick, A.. “Employee Investment Decisions about Company Stock.” In Pension Design and Structure: New Lessons From Behavioral Finance, Mitchell, O. S. and Utkus, S., eds. New York, NY: Oxford University Press Inc. (2004).Google Scholar
Clark, R. L.; Goodfellow, G. P.; Schieber, S. J.; and Warwick, D.. “Making the Most of 401(k) Plans: Who's Choosing What?” In Forecasting Retirement Needs and Retirement Wealth, Mitchell, O., Hammond, P. B., and Rappaport, A. M., eds. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press (1999).Google Scholar
Clark, R. L., and Schieber, S.. “Factors Affecting Participation Levels in 401(k) Plans.” In Living with Defined Contribution Plans, Mitchell, O. S. and Schieber, S. J., eds. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press (1998).Google Scholar
Cohen, L. “Loyalty Based Portfolio Choice.” Working Paper, University of Chicago (2004).Google Scholar
CPS, . “Employee Tenure in the Mid-1990s.” CPS Publications, 01 30, 1997.Google Scholar
Degeorge, F.; Jenter, D.; Moel, A.; and Tufano, P.. “Selling Company Shares to Reluctant Employees: France Telecom's Experience.” Journal of Financial Economics, 71 (2004), 169202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, P.; Gilkeson, J.; and List, J.. “Gender Differences in Revealed Risk Taking: Evidence from Mutual Fund Investors.” Economic Letters, 76 (2002), 151159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodfellow, G. P., and Schieber, S. J.. “Investment of Assets in Self-Directed Retirement Plans.” In Positioning Pensions for the Twenty-First Century, Gordon, M. S., Mitchell, O. S., and Twinney, M. M., eds. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press (1997).Google Scholar
Greene, W. H.Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc. (1997).Google Scholar
Hewitt Associates LLC. 2003 Hewitt Universe Benchmarks-How Well Are Employees Saving and Investing in 401(k) Plans (2003)Google Scholar
Huberman, G.Familiarity Breeds Investment.” Review of Financial Studies, 14 (2001), 659680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huberman, G., and Jiang, W.. “Offering vs. Choice in 401(k) Plans: Equity Exposure and Number of Funds.” Journal of Finance, 61 (2006), 763801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagannathan, R., and Kocherlakota, N. R.. “Why Should Older People Invest Less in Stocks Than Younger People.” Quarterly Review Federal Reserve of Minneapolis, Summer (1996), 1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John Hancock Financial Services. The Sixth Defined Contribution Plan Survey (1999).Google Scholar
Liang, N., and Weisbenner, S.. “Investor Behavior and Purchase of Company Stock in 401(k) Plans- The Importance of Plan Design.” Working Paper, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mankiw, G. N., and Zeldes, S. P.. “The Consumption of Stockholders and Nonstockholders.” Journal of Financial Economics, 29 (1991), 97112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meulbroek, L. “Company Stock in Pension Plans: How Costly Is It?” Harvard Business School Working Paper 02–058 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munnell, A. H.; Sunden, A.; and Taylor, C.. “What Determines 401(k) Participation and Contributions?Social Security Bulletin, 64 (2001/2002), 6475.Google ScholarPubMed
NASD Press Release. “NASD Warns Investors Too Much Company Stock Can Jeopardize Financial Future: Diversification is Key to Reducing Risk,” 02 17, 2005.Google Scholar
Ofek, E., and Yermack, D.. “Taking Stock: Equity-Based Compensation and the Evolution of Managerial Ownership.” Journal of Finance, 55 (2000), 13671384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poterba, J. M.Lessons from Enron: Employer Stock and 401(k) Plans.” American Economic Review, 93 (2003), 398404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sengmuller, P. “Performance Predicts Asset Allocation: Company Stock in 401(k) Plans.” Working Paper, Columbia University (2002).Google Scholar
Sunden, A. E., and Surette, B. J.. “Gender Differences in the Allocation of Assets in Retirement Savings Plans.” American Economic Review, 88 (1998), 207211.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H.Mental Accounting Matters.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12 (1999), 183206.3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vissing-Jorgensen, A.Limited Asset Market Participation and the Elasticity of Intertemporal Substitution.” Journal of Political Economy, 110 (2002), 825853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar