Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T07:28:27.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The End of the Month as a Preferred Habitat: A Test of Operational Efficiency in the Money Market

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Joseph P. Ogden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper argues that an aggregate preferred habitat for investors exists on (or about) the last day of the calendar month, due to standardizations in the nation's payments system resulting in a concentrated flow of funds on this date. Thus, equilibrium yield discounts are predicted for securities maturing on such dates. Empirical tests on monthly and daily Treasury bill data support the principal hypothesis, as well as several ancillary hypotheses. The results have implications for Treasury debt management, for the short-term cash and debt management practices of businesses and banks, and for the empirical estimation of daily, weekly, or monthly return premiums on risky securities.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , September 1987 , pp. 329 - 343
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Booth, J. R., and Smith, R. L.. “The Application of Errors-in-Variables Methodology to Capital Market Research: Evidence on the Small Firm Effect.’ Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 20 (12 1985), 501–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Cox, J. C.; Ingersoll, J. E.; and Ross, S. A.. “A Re-examination of Traditional Hypotheses about the Term Structure of Interest Rates.’ Journal of Finance, 36 (09 1981), 769–799.Google Scholar
[3]Cox, J. C.; Ingersoll, J. E.; and Ross, S. A.. “A Theory of the Term Structure of Interest Rates.” Econometrica, 53 (03 1985), 385–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Culbertson, J. M. “The Term Structure of Interest Rates.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 71 (11 1957), 489–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Elliot, J. W., and Echols, M. E.. “Market Segmentation, Speculative Behavior, and the Term Structure of Interest Rates.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 58 (02 1976), 40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Fama, E. F. “The Information in the Term Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, 13 (12 1984), 509–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Fisher, I. “Appreciation and Interest.” Publications of the American Economic Association, 11 (08 1896), 23–29, 91–92.Google Scholar
[8]Hicks, J. R.Value and Capital, 2nd ed.London: Oxford Univ. Press (1946).Google Scholar
[9]Ho, T. S. Y., and Saunders, A.. “A Micro Model of the Federal Funds Market.” Journal of Finance, 40 (07 1985), 977–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Kamath, R. R.; Khaksari, S.; Meier, H. H.; and Winklepleck, J.. “Management of Excess Cash: Practices and Developments.” Financial Management, 14 (Autumn 1985), 70–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Lee, W.; Maness, T.; and Tuttle, D.. “Nonspeculative Behavior and the Term Structure.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 15 (03 1980), 53–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Lutz, F. A. “The Structure of Interest Rates.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 55 (11 1940), 36–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]McCallum, J. “The Expected Holding Period Return, Uncertainty and the Term Structure of Interest Rates.” Journal of Finance, 30 (05 1975), 307–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Modigliani, F., and Sutch, R.. “Innovations in Interest Rate Policy.” American Economic Review, 56 (05 1966), 178–197.Google Scholar
[15]Park, S. Y., and Reinganum, M. R.. “The Puzzling Price Behavior of Treasury Bills that Mature at the Turn of the Calendar Months.” Journal of Financial Economics, 16 (06 1986), 267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]SAS Institute. User's Guide: Statistics. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc. (1982).Google Scholar