Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T11:32:24.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Note on Geometric Mean Portfolio Selection and the Market Prices of Equities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Robert H. Litzenberger  and
A. P. Budd
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This note examines the positive implications of the Latané-Tuttle [5, 6] geometric mean portfolio selection criteria for the determination of stock prices. Recently, Mossin [9] and Lintner [10] have derived the market prices of equities under the respective assumptions that investors have quadratic and exponential utility functions. While it would be presumptuous to suggest that all investors are “long-run wealth” maximizers, this criterion has a certain amount of intuitive appeal. The geometric mean criterion is equivalent to the maximization of a Bernoulli or logarithmic utility function and displays the desirable characteristic of decreasing absolute (i.e., as the investor's wealth increases, he becomes less averse to risk). This contrasts with the exponential utility function which displays constant absolute risk aversion and the quadratic utility function which displays the undesirable characteristic of increasing absolute risk aversion. Another suggested desirable characteristic of the geometric mean criterion is that it emphasizes the avoidance of bankruptcy while maximizing the asymptotic rate of growth of wealth [4, 5] and maximizing the probability of exceeding a given wealth level within a fixed time [3]. This note analyzes the aggregate effect on stock prices of investors using the geometric mean portfolio selection criterion.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 6 , Issue 5 , December 1971 , pp. 1277 - 1282
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Arrow, K. J.Aspects of the Theory of Risk-Bearing. Helsinki, 1965.Google Scholar
[2]Bernoulli, D. “Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk.” Econometrica, January 1954, 22, pp. 23–36.Google Scholar
[3]Brieman, L. “Optimal Gambling Systems for Favorable Games.” Proceedings of Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, I. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1961, pp. 65–78.Google Scholar
[4]Hakansson, N. H. “Capital Growth and the Mean-Variance Approach to Portfolio Selection,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, January 1971, 6, pp. 517–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]LatanéH, A. H, A. “Criteria for Choice Among Risky Ventures.” Journal of Political Economy, April 1959, 67, pp. 144–155.Google Scholar
[6]LatanéH, A. H, A., and Tuttle, D. L.. “Criteria for Portfolio Building.” Journal of Finance, September 1967, 22, pp. 359–373.Google Scholar
[7]Lintner, J. “The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investment in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets.” Review of Economics and Statistics, February 1965, 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Lintner, J. “The Market Price of Risk, Size of Market and Investor's Risk Aversion.” Review of Economics and Statistics, February 1970, 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Mossin, J. “Security Pricing and Investment Criteria in Competitive Markets.” American Economic Review, February 1968, 59, pp. 749–756.Google Scholar
[10]Mossin, J. “Optimal Multiperiod Portfolio Policies.” Journal of Business, April 1968, 41, pp. 768–783.Google Scholar
[11]Renshaw, E. F., and Renshaw, V.. “Some Notes on the Rationality Model.” Southern Economic Journal, January 1970, 36, pp. 244–251.Google Scholar
[12]Roll, R. “Some Preliminary Evidence on the ‘Growth Optimum’ Model.” Working Paper No. 3–71–2, Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Carnegie-Mellon University, July 1971.Google Scholar
[13]Sharpe, W. F. “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk.” Journal of Finance, September 1964, 19, pp. 425–442.Google Scholar
[14]Young, W. E., and Trent, R. H.. “Geometric Mean Approximations of Individual Security and Portfolio Performance.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, June 1969, 4, pp. 179–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar