Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T12:59:40.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Odd-Lot Trading in the Stock Market and Its Market Impact

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Hsiu-Kwang Wu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

By examining the annual data from 1937-1967, we found that odd-lot volume has become loss important in the market in recent years. Although the odd-lot trading volume has increased steadily in the absolute term since the end of World War II, the share of odd-lot trading in relation to total round-lot volume has been declining. By 1967, the percentage of odd-lot volume to round-lot total sales was down to 11.6 percent. The same data also indicate that odd-lot short sales have increased moderately since 1962; however, the volume is quite insignificant. The average of odd-lot short sales to total round-lot short sales for the 31-year period is only 1.9 percent. Odd-lotters were also found to be net purchasers during this period (1937-1967); however, odd-lotters have turned into net sellers in recent years. The total net sales from 1961 to 1967 amounted to 22.2 million shares, which is approximately 25 percent of the total net purchases of the entire period (1937-1967).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , January 1972 , pp. 1321 - 1341
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Baumol, W. J. “Speculation, Profitability and Stability.” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 39, No. 2, August 1957, pp. 263–271.Google Scholar
[2]Baumol, W. J. “Reply to Telser.” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 41, No. 2, Part 2, August 1959, pp. 301–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Drew, G. A. “qA Clarification of the Odd-Lot Theory.” Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 23, No. 3, September–October 1967, pp. 107–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Drew, G. A.New Metliods for Profit in the Stock Market. Boston: Metcalf Press, 1955.Google Scholar
[5]Duesenberry, J.S. “Criteria for Judging the Performance of Capital Markets.” In Wu, H. K. and Zakon, A. J., eds., Elements of Investments. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1965.Google Scholar
[6]Friedman, M.Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953.Google Scholar
[7]Friend, I. “Broad Implications of the S.E.C. Special Study.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 21, No. 2, May 1966, pp. 324–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Friend, I., and DeCani, J.. “Stock Market Experience of Different Investor Groups.”American Statistical Association Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section, 1966, pp. 44–62.Google Scholar
[9]Hardy, C. O.Odd-Lot Trading on the New York Stock Exchange. New York: Brookings Institution, 1939.Google Scholar
[10]Kaish, S. “Odd-Lotter Trading of High and Low Quality Stocks,” Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 25, No. 2, March–April 1969, pp. 88–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Kaish, S. “Odd-Lot Profit and Loss Performance.” Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 25, No. 5, September–October 1969, pp. 83–89.Google Scholar
[12]Kewley, T. J., and Stevenson, R. A.. “The Odd-Lot Theory as Revealed by Purchase and Sale Statistics for Individual Stocks.” Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 23, No. 5, September–October 1967, pp. 103–106.Google Scholar
[13]Kewley, T. J. “The Odd-Lot Theory for Individual Stocks: A Reply.” Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 25, No. 1, January–February 1969, pp. 99–104.Google Scholar
[14]Smith, A.The Wealth of Nations. New York: Random House, The Modern Library, 1937.Google Scholar
[15]Telser, L. G. “A Theory of Speculation and Relating Profitability and Stability.” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 41, No. 2, Part 2, August 1959, pp. 295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]U. S. House of Representatives, Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce. Report of Special Study of Securities Markets of the Securities and Exchange Commission, House Document No. 95, 88th Congress, 1st Session, 1963.Google Scholar
[17]Vernon, R.The Course of Odd-Lot Transactions of the New York Stock Exchange, 1904–1938.U. S. Securities and-Exchange Commission,November 1938.Google Scholar
[18]Wu, H. K. “An Economist Looks at Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.” Columbia Law Review. Vol. 68, No. 2, February 1968, pp. 260–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar