Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T12:39:15.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Optimal Asset Abandonment and Replacement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Keith M. Howe  and
George M. McCabe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Numerous studies in recent years have emphasized the importance of accounting properly for abandoment value in capital budgeting (see [1], [4], [7], [10], and [11]). For a variety of reasons, a project need be neither physically exhausted nor have negative cash flows to be abandoned. Robichek and Van Home [10] suggested that a project should be abandoned in any period in which the present value of future cash flows does not exceed its abandonment value. In a modification of this rule, Dyl and Long [4] proposed that the firm give consideration to all possible future abandonment opportunities. They argued that abandonment need not occur at the earliest possible date that the abandonment condition is satisfied, but rather at the date that yields the highest NPV over all future abandonment possibilities. A generalization of these models was offered by Bonini [1], who developed a dynamic programming model to analyze investment projects with abandonment possibilities and uncertain cash flows. More recently, Gaumnitz and Emery [7] compared the abandonment decision to the like-for-like replacement decision and noted that the correct model for a particular case depends on the suitability of the assumptions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , September 1983 , pp. 295 - 305
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Bonini, C. P. “Capital Investment under Uncertainty with Abandonment Options.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 12 (03 1977), pp. 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Copeland, T. E., and Weston, J. F.. Financial Theory and Corporate Policy. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley (1979).Google Scholar
[3]Dorfman, R. “The Meaning of Internal Rates of Return.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 36 (12 1981), pp. 1011–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Dyl, E. A., and Long, H. W.. “Abandonment Value and Capital Budgeting.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 24 (03 1969). pp. 88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Elton, E. J., and Gruber, M. J.. “Valuation and Asset Selection under Alternative Investment Opportunities.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 31 (05 1976), pp. 515–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Fama, E. F., and Miller, M. H.. The Theory of Finance. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston (1972).Google Scholar
[7]Gaumnitz, J. E., and Emery, D. R.. “Asset Growth, Abandonment Value and the Replacement Decision of Like-For-Like Capital Assets”. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 15 (06 1980), pp. 407–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Hirshleifer, J.Investment, Interest and Capital. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall (1970).Google Scholar
[9]Preinreich, G. A. D. “The Economic Life of Industrial Equipment.” Econometrica, Vol. 8 (01 1940). pp. 12–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Robichek, A. A., and Home, J. C. Van. ‘Abandonment Value and Capital Budgeting.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 22 (12 1967), pp. 577–589.Google Scholar
[11]Robichek, A. A., and Van Home, J. C.. “Abandonment Value and Capital Budgeting: Reply.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 24 (03 1969), pp. 96–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar