Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T09:45:14.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Optimal Number of Securities in a Risky Asset Portfolio When There Are Fixed Costs of Transacting: Theory and Some Empirical Results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

M. J. Brennan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The normative theory of portfolio selection has, since Markowitz, proceeded for the most part on the assumption that there are no costs of transacting in securities markets. Exceptions to this generalization are the work of Pogue who proposes a quadratic programming solution to the portfolio selection problem with variable transactions costs, and, in a multiperiod context, the ad hoc portfolio revision models of Smith, and the more rigorous, though computationally burdensome dynamic programming models of Chen et al. All of these models focus exclusively on the variable costs of transacting. Mao deals implicitly with the fixed costs of purchasing securities and the limited diversification which these will imply. However, his model both lacks an explicit optimization criterion for determining the number of securities to include in the portfolio and assumes a homogeneous security universe; this latter assumption is relaxed when he later considers the problem of which securities should be included in the portfolio. Clearly an ideal solution to the problem must consider simultaneously both how many and which securities to include. More recently, Jacob has developed some simplified models for selecting optimal portfolios, given a constraint on the number of securities which may be included in the portfolio. While her models are superior to Mao's in taking account of the residual risk of the securities as well as their systematic risk, they do not contain any explicit procedure for determining the optimal number of securities to include in the portfolio.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , September 1975 , pp. 483 - 496
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Black, Fischer; Jensen, Michael C.; and Scholes, Myron. “The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some Empirical Tests.” In Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets, edited by Jensen, Michael C.. New York: Praeger, 1972.Google Scholar
[2]Chen, Andrew H. Y.; Jen, Frank C.; and Zionts, Stanley. “The Optimal Portfolio Revision Policy.” Journal of Business, January 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Fama, Eugene F. “Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work.” Journal of Finance, May 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Jacob, Nancy L. “A Limited-Diversification Portfolio Selection Model for the Small Investor.” Forthcoming, Journal of Finance.Google Scholar
[5]Mao, James C. T. “Essentials of Portfolio Diversification Strategy.” Journal of Finance, December 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Markowitz, H.Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. New York: John Wiley, 1959.Google Scholar
[7]Pogue, G. A. “An Extension of the Markowitz Portfolio Selection Model to Include Variable Transactions' Costs, Short Sales, Leverage Policies and Taxes.” Journal of Finance, December 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Sharpe, W. F. “A Simplified Model for Portfolio Analysis.” Management Science, January 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Smith, Keith V. “A Transition Model for Portfolio Revision.” Journal of Finance, September 1967.Google Scholar
[10]Smith, Keith V. “Alternative Procedures for Revising Investment Portfolios.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, December 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar