Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T13:41:19.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pricing Municipal Debt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Edward Henry Robbins
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pricing municipal debt is a process substantially different from the valuation of corporate liabilities. Municipalities are not seized upon default. Therefore, they might own additional assets that could he made available to retire debt even when the value of pledged revenues is insufficient to do so. However, if the value of the municipality's additional assets is only observable privately, moral hazard can deter payments from these alternative revenue sources. A second consequence of lack of seizure is that the municipality survives and might return to the capital markets to raise additional funds in the future. This opens an opportunity to induce “extraordinary” payments from the value of the additional assets through multiperiod pricing controls (e.g., by following defaults with poor pricing for subsequent securities issues).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , December 1984 , pp. 467 - 483
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Fama, Eugene F. “Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm.” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 88 (04 1980), pp. 288–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Hempel, George H.Measures of Municipal Bond Quality. Michigan Business Reports No. 53, Ann Arbor, MI: Bureau of Business Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Michigan (1967).Google Scholar
[3]Kreps, David M.; Milgrom, Paul; Roberts, John; and Wilson, Robert. “Rational Cooperation in the Finitely Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma.” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 27 (08 1982), pp. 245–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Kreps, David M., and Wilson, Robert. “Reputation and Imperfect Information.” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 27 (08 1982), pp. 253–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Lambert, Richard A. “Long Term Contracts and Moral Hazard.” Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 14 (Autumn 1983), pp. 441–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Merton, Robert C. “On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 29 (05 1974), pp. 449–470.Google Scholar
[7]Milgrom, Paul, and Roberts, John. “Predation, Reputation, and Entry Deterrence.” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 27 (08 1982), pp. 280–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Radner, Roy. “A Repeated Principal-Agent Game with Discounting.” Bell Laboratories Economics Discussion Paper No. 233 (10 1981).Google Scholar
[9]Robbins, Edward H. “Monitoring, Manipulation, and Market Coordination: The Roles of Investment Banking in Establishing Better Pricing for Underwritten Issues.” Working Paper, Stanford University (07 1984).Google Scholar
[10]Ross, Stephen A. “The Determination of Financial Structure: The Incentive-Signalling Approach.” Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 8 (Spring 1977), pp. 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Ross, Stephen A. “Some Notes on Financial Incentive-Signalling Models, Activity Choice and Risk Preferences.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 33 (06 1978), pp. 777–794.Google Scholar
[12]Rubinstein, Ariel, and Yaari, Menahem E.. “Repeated Insurance Contracts and Moral Hazard.” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 30 (06 1983), pp. 74–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Selten, Reinhard. “The Chain Store Paradox.” Theory and Decision, Vol. 9 (04 1978), pp. 127–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar