Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T07:00:47.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Short-Term Compensation Contracts and Executive Expenditure Decisions: The Case of Commercial Banks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Abstract

This paper examines the associations between the adoption of a short-term compensation contract and changes in executive expenditure decisions for a sample of major commercial banks. In particular, the analysis concentrates primarily on changes in executive expenditures on discretionary items (expenditures preferred more by the manager than by shareholders). The results indicate that the adoption of a short-term compensation plan is associated with modest decreases in the ratio of discretionary expenditures to current operating revenue and the ratio of discretionary expenditures to managerial compensation for banks making the contractual change. These results are consistent with the conclusion that the mix of discretionary expenditures and effort selected by the manager changes with the adoption of a short-term compensation contract.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Alchian, A., and Demsetz, H.. “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization.” American Economic Review, 62 (12 1972), 777795.Google Scholar
[2]Brickley, J.; Bhagat, S.; and Lease, R.. “The Impact of Long-Range Managerial Compensation Plans on Shareholder Wealth.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7 (04 1985), 115129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Brown, S., and Warner, J.. “Measuring Security Price Performance.” Journal of Financial Economics, 7 (09 1980), 205258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Conference Board. Top Executive Compensation. New York: Conference Board (1980).Google Scholar
[5]Demsetz, H.The Structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm.” Journal of Law and Economics, 26 (06 1983), 375390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Edwards, F.Managerial Objectives in Regulated Industries: Expense-Preference Behavior in Banking.” Journal of Political Economy, 85 (02 1977), 147162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Hannan, T., and Mavinga, F.. “Expense Preference and Managerial Control: The Case of the Banking Firm.” The Bell Journal of Economics, 11 (Autumn 1980), 671682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Harris, M., and Raviv, A.. “Some Results on Incentive Contracts with Applications to Education, Health Insurance, and Law Enforcement.” American Economic Review, 68 (03 1978), 8095.Google ScholarPubMed
[9]Healy, P.Evidence on the Effect of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Procedure and Accrual Decisions.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7 (04 1985), 85107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Hollander, M., and Wolfe, D.. Nonparametric Statistical Methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons (1973).Google Scholar
[11]Holmstrom, B.Moral Hazard and Observability.” The Bell Journal of Economics, 10 (Spring 1979), 7491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Jensen, M., and Meckling, W.. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (Fall 1976), 305360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Lambert, R., and Larcker, D.. “Golden Parachutes, Executive Decision-Making, and Shareholder Wealth.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7 (04 1985), 179203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Lambert, R., and Larcker, D. “Stock Options and Managerial Decision-Making.” Unpubl. working paper, The Wharton School, Univ. of PA (1986).Google Scholar
[15]Larcker, D.The Association between Performance Plan Adoption and Corporate Capital Investment.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5 (04 1983), 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Louis, A.In Search of Style at the ‘New Marine.’Fortune, 106 (07 26, 1982), 4046.Google Scholar
[17]Mruk, E., and Giardina, J.. Executive Compensation. New York: Financial Executives Inst. (1980).Google Scholar
[18]Patell, J.Corporate Forecasts of Earnings per Share and Stock Price Behavior: Empirical Tests.” Journal ofAccounting Research, 14 (Autumn 1976), 246—276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Robert Morris Associates. Incentive Compensation Systems for Commercial Loan Officers. Philadelphia: Robert Morris Assoc. (1983).Google Scholar
[20]Ross, S.The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal's Problem.” The American Economic Review, 63 (05 1973), 134139.Google Scholar
[21]Segal, Martin E., & Company, Inc. ExecuComp 1979 Review. (New York: Segal Assoc. (1979).Google Scholar
[22]Scholes, M., and Williams, J.. “Estimating Betas from Nonsynchronous Data.” Journal of Financial Economics, 5 (12 1977), 309328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Shavell, S.Risk Sharing and Incentives in the Principal and Agent Relationship.” The Bell Journal of Economics, 10 (Spring 1979), 5573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Siegel, S.Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill (1956).Google Scholar
[25]Smirlock, M., and Marshall, W.. “Monopoly Power and Expense-Preference Behavior: Theory and Evidence to the Contrary.” The Bell Journal of Economics, 14 (Spring 1983), 166178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26]Smith, C., and Watts, R.. “Incentive and Tax Effects of U.S. Executive Compensation Plans.” Australian Management Journal, 7 (1982), 139157.Google Scholar
[27]Tehranian, H., and Waegelein, J.. “Market Reaction to Short-term Executive Compensation Plan Adoption.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7 (04 1985), 131144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[28]Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby. Top 100 Compensation Study. New York: Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby (1980).Google Scholar
[29]Verbrugge, J., and Jahera, J.. “Expense Preference Behavior in the Savings and Loan Industry.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 13 (11 1981), 465476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[30]Williamson, O.Managerial Discretion and Business Behavior.” American Economic Review, 53 (12 1963), 10321057.Google Scholar