Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T06:51:05.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Skewness Preference and Portfolio Choice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Alex Kane
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the virtues of parameter preference models (presented in general form in Rubinstein [23]) is their empirical content. Applied models of financial theory rely heavily on the mean variance (MV) version of parameter preference. As spelled out in Samuelson [25], MV models are adequate with compact distributions of returns and when portfolio decisions are made frequently so that the risk parameter becomes sufficiently small.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , March 1982 , pp. 15 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Arditti, F. “Risk and the Required Return on Equity.” Journal of Finance (03 1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Arditti, F. “Another Look at Mutual Fund Performance.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (06 1971).Google Scholar
[3]Arrow, K. “Aspects of the Theory of Risk Bearing.” Yrjo Jahnssonin Saatio (1965).Google Scholar
[4]Black, F. “Capital Market Equilibrium with Restricted Borrowing.” Journal of Business, Vol. 45 (1972), pp. 444–455.Google Scholar
[5]Blume, M., and Friend, I.. “The Asset Structure of Individual Portfolios and Some Implications for Utility Functions.” Journal of Finance (05 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Borch, K. “A Note on Uncertainty and Indifference Curves.” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 36 (1969), pp. 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Cass, D., and Stiglitz, J.. “The Structure of Investor Preferences and Asset Returns on Separability in Portfolio Allocation: A Contribution to the Pure Theory of Mutual Funds.” Journal of Economic Theory (06 1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Feldstein, M. “Mean Variance Analysis in the Theory of Liquidity Preference and Portfolio Selection.” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 36 (1969) pp. 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Friend, I., and Westerfield, R.. “Co-Skewness and Capital Asset Pricing.” Journal of Finance (09 1980).Google Scholar
[10]Ingersoll, J. “Multidimensional Security Pricing.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (12 1975).Google Scholar
[11]Kraus, A., and Brennan, M.. “The Geometry of Separation and Myopia.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (03 1978).Google Scholar
[12]Kraus, A., and Litzenberger, R.. “Skewness Preference and the Valuation of Risk Assets.” Journal of Finance (09 1976).Google Scholar
[13]Levy, H. “A Utility Function Depending on Three Moments.” Journal of Finance (09 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Levy, H., and Sarnat, M.. Investment and Portfolio Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1972).Google Scholar
[15]Lintner, J. “The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investment in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets.” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 47 (1965), pp. 13–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Markowitz, H. “Portfolio Selection.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 8 (1952), pp. 77–91.Google Scholar
[17]Merton, R. “Optimum Consumption and Portfolio Rules in a Continuous Time Model.” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 3 (1971), pp. 373–413.Google Scholar
[18]Miller, M., and Scholes, M.. “Rates of Return in Relation to Risk: A Reexamination of Some Recent Findings.” Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets, Jensen, M. (ed.). New York: Praeger (1972).Google Scholar
[19]Mossin, M. “Equi1ibrium in a Capital Market.” Econometrics, Vol. 34 (1966), pp. 768–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Mossin, M. “Optimal Multiperiod Portfolio Policies.” Journal of Business (04 1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Mossin, M.Theory of Financial Markets. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall (1973).Google Scholar
[22]Pratt, J. “Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large.” Econometrics, Vol. 32 (1964), pp. 122–136.Google Scholar
[23]Rubinstein, M. “The Fundamental Theorem of Parameter Preference and Security Valuation.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (01 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Samuelson, P. “General Proof that Diversification Pays.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 2 (1967), pp. 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25]Samuelson, P. “The Fundamental Approximation of Theorem of Portfolio Analysis in Terms of Means, Variances and Higher Moments.” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 37 (1970), pp. 537–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26]Sharpe, W. “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Condition of Risk.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 19 (1964), pp. 425–442.Google Scholar
[27]Simkowitz, M, and Beedles, W.. “Diversification in a Three Moment World.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (12 1978).Google Scholar
[28]Stiglitz, J. “Review of Aspects of the Theory of Risk Bearing.” Econometrics, Vol. 37 (1969).Google Scholar
[29]Tobin, J. “Liquidity Preference as Behavior towards Risk.” Review of Economic Studies (02 1968).Google Scholar