Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T16:47:34.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A State Preference Model of Capital Gains Taxation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Extract

Economists generally agree that a basic characteristic of a good tax is economic neutrality. That is, a tax should not influence economic behavior unless it was intentionally designed to produce a specific effect. In this context, the economic effects of the current system of capital gains taxation in the United States have been the subject of considerable concern. Most researchers have concluded that the current system of capital gains taxation has an undesirable and destabilizing effect on the securities markets because the practices of taxing capital gains only when they are realized and, correspondingly, allowing tax deductions for capital losses only upon realization, presumably cause investors to defer the realization of capital gains and to accelerate the realization of capital losses. Based upon this behavioral assumption, many economists infer an effect on the securities markets.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Conway, Geoffrey R. “The Taxation of Capital Gains.” Number 19 in Studies of the Royal Commission on Taxation. Ottawa: Queen's Printer and Controller of Stationery (1968).Google Scholar
2David, Martin. “Economic Effects of the Capital Gains Tax.” American Economic Review, Vol. 9 (05 1964), pp. 288299.Google Scholar
3David, Martin. Alternative Approaches to Capital Gains Taxation. Washington, D. C.: The Brookings Institution (1968).Google Scholar
4Due, John F.Government Finance: An Economic Analysis. Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, Inc. (1954).Google Scholar
5Gemmill, Robert F.The Effect of the Capital Gains Tax on Asset Prices.” National Tax Journal, Vol. 9 (12 1956), pp. 289301.Google Scholar
6Haugen, Robert A., and Wichern, Dean W.. “The Diametric Effects of the Capital Gains Tax on the Stability of Stock Prices.” Journal of Finance (forthcoming).Google Scholar
7Hirschleifer, Jack. Investment, Interest, and Capital. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice–Hall (1970).Google Scholar
8Holt, Charles C., and Shelton, John P.. “The Implications of the Capital Gains Tax for Investment Decisions.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 16 (12 1961), pp. 559580.Google Scholar
9Holt, Charles C., and Shelton, John P.. “The Lock–in Effect of the Capital Gains Tax.” National Tax Journal, Vol. 15 (12 1962), pp. 337–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Musgrave, Richard A.The Theory of Public Finance: A Study in Public Economy. New York: Mc Graw–Hill (1959).Google Scholar
11Myers, Stewart C.A Time–State Preference Model of Security Valuation.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 3 (03 1968), pp. 133.Google Scholar
12Somers, Harold M.An Economic Analysis of the Capital Gains Tax.” National Tax Journal, Vol. 1 (09 1948), pp. 226232.Google Scholar
13Somers, Harold M.Reconsideration of the Capital Gains Tax.” National Tax Journal, Vol. 13 (12 1960), pp. 289–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Sprinkel, Beryl W., and West, B. Kenneth. “Effects of Capital Gains Taxes on Investment Decisions.” Journal of Business, Vol. 35 (04 1962), pp. 122134.Google Scholar
15Steger, Wilbur A.The Taxation of Unrealized Capital Gains and Losses: A Statistical Study.” National Tax Journal, Vol. 10 (09 1957), pp. 266281.Google Scholar
16Steger, Wilbur A. “Economic Consequences of Substantial Changes in the Method of Taxing Capital Gains and Losses.” Tax Revision Compendium, House Committee on Ways and Means, 86th Congress, 1st Session (1959), pp. 12611284.Google Scholar
17Wallich, Henry C.Taxation of Capital Gains in the Light of Recent Economic Developments.” National Tax Journal, Vol. 18 (06 1965), pp. 133150.Google Scholar