Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T16:43:49.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Study of the Demand for Housing by Low Versus High Income Households

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

James R. Follain Jr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

”Poor people cause poor housing.” This statement is the basis for one of the major policy proposals to eradicate poor housing and neighborhoods that plague some of our urban areas. If the motto is correct, then poor housing and poor neighborhoods can be eliminated by providing direct support for the demand for housing by low-income households. The role of government, under such a policy, is to funnel its resources to households in the form of demand subsidies. Examples of such demand-side programs are housing allowances and the Section 8 existing housing program.

Type
III. Issues in Residential Real Estate
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , November 1979 , pp. 769 - 782
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Campbell, J., and Smith, B.. “The Demand for Housing: A New Look at Urban Empiricism.” Paper presented at the Western Economic Association Meeting (1976).Google Scholar
[2]de Leeuw, Frank. “The Demand for Housing: A Review of Cross-Section Evidence.” American Economic Review (02 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Cronin, Francis J. “The Housing Demand of Low Income Households.” Urban Institute Working Paper 249–25 (06 1979).Google Scholar
[4]Follain, James. “Place-to-Place Indexes of the Cost of Comparable Housing.” Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco Working Paper No. 3–579 (1979).Google Scholar
[5]Follain, James. “How Well Do Section 8 FMRs Match the Cost of Rental Housing? Data from 39 Large Cities.” Urban Institute Contract Report, No. 249–15 (1979).Google Scholar
[6]Follain, James, and Malpezzi, Stephen. “Dissecting Housing Value and Rent: Estimates of Hedonic Indexes for 39 Large SMSAs.” Urban Institute Contract Report, No. 249–17 (1979).Google Scholar
[7]Friedman, Joseph, and Weinberg, Daniel H.. “The Demand for Rental Housing: Evidence from an Experiment.” Paper presented at the Southern Economic Association (11 1977).Google Scholar
[8]Muth, Richard. “Demand for Non-Farm Housing.” In The Demand for Durable Goods, edited by Harberger, Arnold. University of Chicago Press (1960).Google Scholar
[9]Ozanne, Larry. “Estimates of the Inflationary Effect of Housing Allowances for 39 Metropolitan Areas.” Urban Institute (forthcoming).Google Scholar
[10]Polinsky, A. M. “Demand for Housing: A Study in Specification and Grouping.” Econometrica, Vol. 45 (03 1977), pp. 447–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Reid, Margaret. Housing and Income. University of Chicago Press (1960).Google Scholar
[12]United States Bureau of the Census. Annual Housing Survey 1975, United States and Regions: 1975 Current Housing Reports Series H-150. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office (1977).Google Scholar
[13]U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. “Annual Housing Survey 1974 and 1975 Housing Characteristics for Selected Metropolitan Areas.” Current Housing Reports, Series H-170. Washington, D.C: U. S. Government Printing Office (1976 and 1977).Google Scholar
[14]U. S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. “Autumn 1974 Urban Family Budgets and Comparative Indexes for Selected Urban Areas.” Washington, D.C: U. S. Government Printing Office (04 1975).Google Scholar