Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T17:16:39.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Term of a Risk-Free Security

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Extract

In the late 1930s, Macaulay [7] and Hicks [6] independently introduced the concept of duration as a measure of the length of a stream of cash flows and a measure of the elasticity of the present value of the stream with respect to a change in the rate of discount, respectively. Approximately 15 years later, Reddington [8] and Heynes and Kirton [5] used the concept to develop interest rate immunization rules for the portfolio management of insurance companies. More recently, Fisher and Weil [1] have developed duration based rules to help investors find investments that will insure them of having some fixed amount of money available at a specific future point in time. In [2], Grove uses duration to link the investor's decision to speculate or immunize with his subjective forecast of future interest rate movements. Finally, Haugen and Wichern [3, 4] show the relationship between duration and the characteristics of bonds and stocks. Also, in analyzing the effect of financial leverage on interest rate risk, they demonstrate how the financial manager can manipulate the capital structure of his firm, so as to render the present value of the common stock insensitive to changes in the rate of interest.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Fisher, L., and Weil, R. L.. “Fluctuations: Returns to Bondholders from Naive and Optimal Strategies.” Journal of Business, Vol. 44 (10 1971), p. 111.Google Scholar
[2]Grove, M. A.On ‘Duration’ and the Optimal Maturity Structure of the Balance Sheet.The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science (Autumn 1974), p. 696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Haugen, R. A., and Wichern, D. W.. “The Elasticity of Financial Assets.” The Journal of Finance, Vol. 29 (09 1974), p. 1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Haugen, R. A., and Wichern, D. W.. “The Intricate Relationship between Financial Leverage and the Stability of Stock Prices.” The Journal of Finance, Vol. 30 (12 1975), p. 1283.Google Scholar
[5]Heynes, A. T., and Kerten, R. J.. “The Structure of a Life Office.” Transactions, Faculty of Actuaries, Vol. 21 (1953).Google Scholar
[6]Hicks, J. R.Value and Capital. London: Oxford University Press (1939).Google Scholar
[7]Macaulay, F. R.Some Theoretical Problems Suggested by the Movements of Interest Rates, Bond Yields and Stock Prices in the United States since 1856. National Bureau of Economic Research. New York: Columbia University Press (1938).Google Scholar
[8]Reddington, F. M.A Review of the Principles of Life Office Evaluation.” Journal, Institute of Actuaries, Vol. 27 (1952).Google Scholar
[9]von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O.. The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 2nd ed.Princeton: Princeton University Press (1947).Google Scholar