Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T15:47:41.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trading Frictions and Futures Price Movements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

David H. Goldenberg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a perfectly efficient market, after adjusting for drift, futures prices would follow a martingale model. The martingale property implies that the changes in futures prices should be serially uncorrelated. This study finds that the price changes of the S&P 500 futures contracts during 1983 and 1984 have negative serial correlation and are better described by a random walk model with reflecting barriers or by a random walk model with reflecting barriers and mean reversion.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , December 1988 , pp. 465 - 481
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Black, F. “The Pricing of Commodity Contracts.” Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (03 1976), 167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenner, M.; Courtadon, G.; Subrahmanyam, M.. “Options on the Spot and Options on the Futures.” Journal of Finance, 40 (12 1985), 1303–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cootner, P. “Stock Prices: Random vs. Systematic Changes.” Industrial Management Review, 3 (1962), reproduced in The Random Character of Stock Market Prices, Cootner, P., ed. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press (1964), 231–252.Google Scholar
Cox, J., and Miller, H. D.. The Theory of Stochastic Processes. London and New York: Chapman and Hall (1965).Google Scholar
Cox, J., and Ross, S.. “The Valuation of Options for Alternative Stochastic Processes.” Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (1976), 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glosten, L., and Milgrom, P.. “Bid, Ask, and Transactions Prices in a Specialist Market with Heterogeneously Informed Traders.” Journal of Financial Economics, 14 (03 1985), 71–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glosten, L. “Components of the Bid-Ask Spread and the Statistical Properties of Transactions Prices.” Journal of Finance, 42 (12 1987), 1293–1307.Google Scholar
Granger, C., and Morgenstern, O.. Predictability of Stock Market Prices. Lexington, MA: Heath Lexington Books (1970), 151–176.Google Scholar
Hasbrouck, J., and Ho, T.. “Order Arrival, Quote Behavior, and the Return-Generating Process.” Journal of Finance, 42 (09 1987), 1035–1048.Google Scholar
Merton, R. C. “Optimum Consumption and Portfolio Rules in a Continuous Time Model.” Journal of Economic Theory, 3 (12 1971), 373–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parzen, E.Time Series Analysis of Irregularly Observed Data. Lecture Notes in Statistics, Vol. 25, New York: Springer-Verlag (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramaswamy, K., and Sundaresan, S.. “The Valuation of Options on Futures Contracts.” Journal of Finance, 40 (12 1985), 1319–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roll, R. “A Simple Implicit Measure of the Effective Bid-Ask Spread in an Efficient Market.” Journal of Finance, 39 (09 1984), 1127–1139.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. “Proof that Properly Anticipated Prices Fluctuate Randomly.” Industrial Management Review, 6 (Spring 1965), 41–49.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. “Proof that Properly Discounted Present Values of Assets Vibrate Randomly.” Bell Journal of Economics, 4 (Autumn 1973), 369–374.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. “Paul Cootner's Reconciliation of Economic Law with Chance.” In Financial Economics: Essays in Honor of Paul Cootner, Sharpe, W. and Cootner, C., eds. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall (1982), 101–117.Google Scholar
Whaley, R. “Valuation of American Futures Options: Theory and Empirical Tests.” Journal of Finance, 41 (03 1986), 127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Working, H. “A Theory of Anticipatory Prices.” American Economic Review, 48 (03 1958), 188–199.Google Scholar