Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T07:55:41.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Under-Diversification and Retention Commitments in IPOs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Lucie Courteau
Lucie Courteau
Affiliation:
Faculty of Administration, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study is an extension of Leland and Pyle's (1977) signaling model. It introduces, in addition to the retained ownership, the length of the holding period to which the owner commits in the prospectus as a signal of firm value. The length of the holding period is found to be a signaling mechanism that complements ownership retention. Depending on the information structure of the firm, the entrepreneur may prefer to commit to a holding period longer than the minimum required by securities regulations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , December 1995 , pp. 487 - 517
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, F., and Faulhaber, G. R.. “Signaling by Underpricing in the IPO Market.” Journal of Financial Economics, 23 (08 1989), 303–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, J. F., and Sobel, J.. “Equilibrium Selection in Signaling Games.” Econometrica, 55 (05 1987), 647–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackwell, D. “Equivalent Comparisons of Experiments.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 24 (06 1953), 265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, I., and Kreps, D.. “Signaling Games and Stable Equilibria.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102 (05 1987), 179–221.Google Scholar
Constantinides, G. M., and Grundy, B. D.. “Optimal Investment with Stock Repurchase and Financing as Signals.” Review of Financial Studies, 2 (1989), 445–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courteau, L. “A Two-Period Model of Signaling with Ownership Retention.” Doctoral Diss., Univ. of British Columbia (1992).Google Scholar
Datar, S. M.; Feltham, G. A.; and Hughes, J. S.. “The Role of Audits and Audit Quality in Valuing New Issues.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 14 (03 1991), 3–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feltham, G. A.; Hughes, J. S.; and Simunic, D. A.. “Empirical Assessment of the Impact of Auditor Quality on the Valuation of New Issues.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 14 (12 1991), 375–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, I., and Stiglitz, J. E.. “The Informational Content of Initial Public Offerings.” Journal of Finance, 44 (06 1989), 469–477.Google Scholar
Grinblatt, M., and Hwang, C. Y.. “Signalling and the Pricing of New Issues.” Journal of Finance, 44 (06 1989), 393–420.Google Scholar
Hughes, P. J. “Signalling by Direct Disclosure under Asymmetric Information.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 8 (06 1986), 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohlberg, E., and Mertens, J.-F.. “On the Strategic Stability of Equilibria.” Econometrica, 54 (09 1986), 1003–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreps, D. M., and Wilson, R. “Sequential Equilibria.” Econometrica, 50 (07 1982), 863–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leland, H. E., and Pyle, D. H.. “Informational Asymmetries, Financial Structure, and Financial Intermediation.” Journal of Finance, 32 (05 1977), 371–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titman, S., and Trueman, B.. “Information Quality and the Valuation of New Issues.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 8 (06 1986), 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, I. “Seasoned Offerings, Imitation Costs, and the Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings.” Journal of Finance, 44 (06 1989), 421–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar