Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T04:38:03.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Accelerated Binomial Option Pricing Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Richard Breen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper describes the application of a convergence acceleration technique to the binomial option pricing model. The resulting model, termed the accelerated binomial option pricing model, also can be viewed as an approximation to the Geske-Johnson model for the value of the American put. The new model is accurate and faster than the conventional binomial model. It is applicable to a wide range of option pricing problems.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 153 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barone-Adesi, G., and Whaley, R. E.. “Efficient Analytic Approximation of American Option Values.” Journal of Finance, 42 (06 1987), 301–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, F., and Scholes, M.. “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities.” Journal of Political Economy, 81 (05–06 1973), 637–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, P. P. “A Lattice Framework for Option Pricing with Two State Variables.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 23 (03 1988), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breen, R. “Improving the Efficiency of the Binomial Option Pricing Model. Unpubl. Working Paper, The Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin (1988).Google Scholar
Cox, J. C.; Ross, S. A.; and Rubinstein, M.. “Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach.” Journal of Financial Economics, 7 (09 1979), 229–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J. C, and Rubinstein, M.. Options Markets. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall (1985).Google Scholar
Geske, R. “The Valuation of Compound Options.” Journal of Financial Economics, 7 (03 1979), 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geske, R., and Johnson, H. E.. “The American Put Option Valued Analytically.” Journal of Finance, 34 (12 1984), 1511–1524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geske, R., and Shastri, K.. “Valuation by Approximation: A Comparison of Alternative Option Valuation Techniques.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 20 (03 1985), 45–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macmillan, L. W. “Analytic Approximation for the American Put Option.” Advances in Futures and Options Research, 1 (1986), 119–139.Google Scholar
Omberg, E. “A Note on the Convergence of the Binomial-Pricing and Compound-Option Models.” Journal of Finance, 42 (06 1987), 463–469.Google Scholar
Rendleman, R. J. Jr, and Bartter, B. J.. “Two-State Option Pricing.” Journal of Finance, 34 (12 1979), 1093–1110.Google Scholar