Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T08:45:02.735Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Operational Model for Security Analysis and Valuation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

James M. Warren
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The FINSIM model provides a fundamental and analytical basis for security evaluation. The methodology presented includes the relevant economic and firm variables in an efficient computational scheme and is useful for:

1. reducing the analysts' judgments about the future to a specific stock price (the model described does not replace the analyst, rather it provides the analyst with a vehicle to determine the implications of his critical assumptions);

2. testing the probable impact of changed expectations concerning the firm and/or the level of the market on stock value;

3. getting at what “the markets” expectations must be to justify the current price;

4. determining the value of additional information (are results changed significantly to pay for the expense of refined estimates?);

5. determining the impact of alternative growth horizons on value; and

6. determining what the actual growth rate of total earnings must be to overcome the dilution effects of financing with external equity.

While the security analyst still faces the problems associated with decision making under uncertainty, the methodology presented facilitates the use of sensitivity analysis to study the implications of uncertain knowledge of parameters.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , June 1974 , pp. 395 - 422
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Ahlers, D.M. “SEM: A Security Evaluation Model.” In Analytical fethods in Banking, edited by Cohen, K. and Hammer, F.. Homewood, Ill.: Irwin, 1966, pp. 300–336.Google Scholar
[2]Bierman, H. Jr., and Hass, J.. “Normative Stock Price Models.” Journal of financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 6 (September 1971), pp. 1135–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Bower, D.H., and Bower, R.S.. “Test of a Stock Valuation Model.” Journal of linance, vol. 25 (May 1970), pp. 483–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Bower, R.S., and Bower, D.H.. “Risk and the Valuation of Common Stock.” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 77 (May–June 1969), pp. 349–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Brigham, E., and Gordon, M.. “Leverage, Dividend Policy, and the Cost of Capital” Journal of Finance, vol. 23 (March 1968), pp. 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Brigham, E., and Pappas, J.. “Duration of Growth, Change in Growth Rates and Corporate Share Price.” financial Analysts Journal, vol. 23 (May–June 1966), pp. 157–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Fama, E.F. “Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Some Clarifying Comments” Journal of finance, vol. 23 (March 1968), pp. 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Fisher, L., and Lorie, J.H.. “Rates of Return on Investments in Common Stock” The Journal of Business of the University of Chicago, vol. 37 (January 1964), pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
[9]Gordon, M.J.The Investment, Financing, and valuation of the Corporation. Homewood, Ill.: Irwin, 1962.Google Scholar
[10]Hakansson, N.H. “On the Dividend Capitalization Model under Uncertainty” Journal of financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 4 (March 1969), pp. 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Holt, C.C. “The Influence of Growth Duration on Share Price” Journal of Finance, vol. 17 (September 1962), pp. 465–475.Google Scholar
[12]Jensen, M.C. “The Foundations and Current State of Capital Market Theory.” In Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets, edited by Jensen, M.C.. New York: Praeger, 1972.Google Scholar
[13]Lintner, J. “Security Prices, Risk, and Maximal Gains from Diversification” Journal of Finance, vol. 20 (December 1965), pp. 587–615.Google Scholar
[14]Malkiel, B.G. “Equity Yields, Growth, and the Structure of Share Prices” American Economic Review, vol. 53 (December 1963), pp. 1004–1031.Google Scholar
[15]Malkiel, B.G. “The Valuation of Public Utility Equities” The Bell Journal of Economics and management Science, vol. 1 (Spring 1970), pp. 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Malkiel, B.G., and Cragg, J.G.. “Expectations and the Structure of Share Prices” American Economic Review, vol. 60 (September 1970), pp. 601–617.Google Scholar
[17]Mossin, J. “Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market” Econometrica, vol. 34 (October 1966), pp. 768–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Myers, S.C. “A Time-State-Preference Model of Security Valuation” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 3 (March 1968), pp. 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Sharpe, W.F. “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk” Journal of Finance, vol. 19 (September 1964), pp. 425–442.Google Scholar
[20]Van Home, J.C., and McDonald, J.G.. “Dividend Policy and New Equity Financing” Journal of Finance, vol. 26 (May 1971), pp. 507–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Warren, J.M., and Shelton, J.P.. “A Simultaneous Equation Approach to Financial Planning” Journal of Finance, vol. 26 (December 1971), pp. 1123–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Whitbeck, V.S., and Kisor, M.. “A New Tool in Investment Decision Making.” financial Analyst Journal, vol. 19 (May–June 1963), pp. 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar