Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T16:55:04.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Borrowing, Short-Sales, Consumer Default, and the Creation of New Assets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Frank Milne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There appears to be some confusion in the literature on asset-pricing models about the role of default-risk in short-selling and borrowing by consumers. For example, in the Sharpe-Lintner ([16] [9]) model it is usual to assume that all consumers are able to borrow or lend without restriction, at the riskless rate of interest. This assumption has been recognized to involve an inconsistency in the theory, because with personal borrowing there is always a positive probability of default with the S-L assumptions, so that the consumer's bond (as seen by any lender) is not a perfect substitute for the safe asset.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , June 1979 , pp. 255 - 273
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Akerloff, G. A. “The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics (08 1970).Google Scholar
[2]Arrow, K. J.Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing. North Holland (1970).Google Scholar
[3]Diamond, P. ”The Role of the Stock Market in a General Equilibrium Model with Technological Uncertainty.” American Economic Review, Vol. 57 (09 1967).Google Scholar
[4]Diamond, P., and Yaari, M.. ”Implications of the Theory of Rationing for Consumer Choice Uncertainty.” American Economic Review (06 1972).Google Scholar
[5]Fama, E., and Miller, M.. The Theory of Finance. Holt, Rinehart and Winston (1972).Google Scholar
[6]Fischer, S. ”Assets, Contingent Commodities and the Slutsky Equations.” Econometrica, Vol. 40, No. 2 (03 1972).Google Scholar
[7]Jaffee, D. M., and Russell, T.. “Imperfect Information, Uncertainty, and Credit Rationing.” Quarterly Journal of Economics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
[8]Keynes, J. M.The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. New York: MacMillan (1936).Google Scholar
[9]Lintner, J. “The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets.” Review of Economics and Statistics (01 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Milne, F. “On the Operation of Financial Markets with Marketing Costs for Securities.” Mimeo (04 1976).Google Scholar
[11]Milne, F.“Default Risk in a General Equilibrium Asset Economy.” International Economic Review (10 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Milne, F.“Financial Markets in Temporary Equilibrium.” Mimeo (11 1976).Google Scholar
[13]Radner, R. “Competitive Equilibrium Under Uncertainty.” Econometrica, Vol. 36, No. 1 (01 1968).Google Scholar
[14]Rothschild, M., and Stiglitz, J.. “Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: The Economics of Imperfect Information.” Quarterly Journal of Economics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
[15]Samuelson, P. A.Foundations of Economic Analysis. H.U.P. (1947).Google Scholar
[16]Sharpe, W. F. “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 19 (09 1964).Google Scholar