Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T07:03:37.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Brand Perceptions and the Market for Common Stock

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Laura Frieder
Affiliation:
llfriede@mgmt.purdue.edu, Krannert School of Management, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Avanidhar Subrahmanyam
Affiliation:
subra@anderson.ucla.edu, The Anderson School, University of California at Los Angeles, 110 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095.

Abstract

This paper investigates the effect of company brand perceptions on investor propensities to hold stocks. We find that, after controlling for other determinants of stockholdings, there is a negative and significant cross-sectional relation between institutional holdings and brand visibility, which is consistent with the notion that individual investors prefer to invest in stocks with easily recognized products. Furthermore, we find that institutional holdings are positively related to firm size and beta. Our analysis supports the notion that institutional portfolios eschew relatively neglected small firms, whereas individuals prefer holding stocks with high recognition and, consequently, greater information precision.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aggarwal, R., and Samwick, A.Performance Incentives within Firms: The Effect of Managerial Responsibility.” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 16131649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, E.Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis, and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy.” Journal of Finance, 23 (1968), 589609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arbel, A.; Carvell, S.; andStrebel, P.Giraffes, Institutions, and Neglected Firms.” Financial Analysts Journal, 39 (1983), 5763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, B., and Odean, T.All That Glitters: The Effect of Attention and News on the Buying Behavior of Individual and Institutional Investors.” Working Paper, Univ. of California at Berkeley (2001).Google Scholar
Barry, C., and Brown, S.Differential Information and Security Market Equilibrium.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 20 (1985), 407422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bizjak, J.; Brickley, J.; andColes, J.Stock-Based Incentive Compensation and Investment Behavior.”Google Scholar
Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16 (1993), 349–371.Google Scholar
Chan, L.; Chen, H.; andLakonishok, J.On Mutual Fund Investment Styles.” Review of Financial Studies, 15 (2002), 14071437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chevalier, J., and Ellison, G.Career Concerns of Mutual Fund Managers.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114 (1999), 389432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, C., and Kim, J.Reputation, Learning and Quality Uncertainty.” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 13 (1996), 4755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, J.; Daniel, N.; andNaveen, L.Managerial Incentives and Risk-Taking.” Working Paper, Georgia State Univ. (2003).Google Scholar
Coles, J.; Loewenstein, U.; andSuay, J.On Equilibrium Pricing under Parameter Uncertainty.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 30 (1995), 347376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Core, J., and Guay, W.The Use of Equity Grants to Manage Optimal Equity Incentive Levels.“ Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28 (1999), 151184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coval, J., and Moskowitz, T.Home Bias at Home: Local Equity Preference in Domestic Portfolios.” Journal of Finance, 54 (1999), 20542073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demsetz, H., and Lehn, K.The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences.” Journal of Political Economy, 93 (1985), 11551177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimson, E.Risk Measurement when Shares are Subject to Infrequent Trading.” Journal of Financial Economics, 7 (1979), 197226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Gazzar, S.Predisclosure Information and Institutional Ownership: A Cross-Sectional Examination of Market Revaluations during Earnings Announcement Periods.” Accounting Review, 73 (1998), 119129.Google Scholar
Elliott, M., and Warfield, A.Do Market Mavens Categorize Brands Differently?” Advances in Consumer Research, 20 (1993), 202208.Google Scholar
Falkenstein, E.Preferences for Stock Characteristics as Revealed by Mutual Fund Portfolio Holdings.” Journal of Finance, 51 (1996), 111135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E., and French, K.Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds.” Journal of Financial Economics, 33 (1993), 356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, A., and Rob, R.Is Bigger Better? Investing in Reputation.” Working Paper, Univ. of Pennsylvania (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, W., and Battese, G.Estimation of Linear Models with Crossed-Error Structure.” Journal of Econometrics, 2 (1974), 6778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaver, J., and Gaver, K.Additional Evidence on the Association between the Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation Policies.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16 (1993), 125160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetzmann, W., and Kumar, A.Equity Portfolio Diversification.” Working Paper, Yale Univ. (2002).Google Scholar
Grinblatt, M., and Moskowitz, T.Predicting Stock Price Movements from Past Returns: The Role of Consistency and Tax-Loss Selling.” Journal of Financial Economics, 71 (2004), 541579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, S., and Stiglitz, J.On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets.” American Economic Review, 70 (1980), 393408.Google Scholar
Grullon, G.; Kanatas, G.; andWeston, J.Advertising, Breadth of Ownership, and Liquidity.” Review of Financial Studies, 17 (2004), 439461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himmelberg, C.; Hubbard, G.; andPalia, D.Understanding the Determinants of Managerial Ownership and the Link between Ownership and Performance.” Journal of Financial Economics, 53 (1999), 353384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoch, S., and Deighton, J.Managing What Consumers Learn from Experience.” Journal of Marketing, 53 (1989), 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huberman, G.Familiarity Breeds Investment.” Review of Financial Studies, 14 (2001), 659680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jegadeesh, N., and Titman, S.Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency.” Journal of Finance, 48 (1993), 6592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M., and Meckling, W.Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (1976), 305360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. “The Simulation Heuristic.” In Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A., eds. New York, NY: Cambridge Univ. Press (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, J., and Stulz, R.Why is There a Home Bias? An Analysis of Foreign Portfolio Equity Ownership in Japan.” Journal of Financial Economics, 46 (1997), 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, R., and Allen, C.Competitive Interference Effects in Consumer Memory for Advertising: The Role of Brand Familiarity.” Journal of Marketing, 58 (1994), 97105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, R., and Bawa, V.The Effect of Estimation Risk on Optimal Portfolio Choice.” Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (1976), 215231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, R., and Bawa, V.The Effect of Limited Information and Estimation Risk on Optimal Portfolio Diversification.” Journal of Financial Economics, 5 (1977), 89111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotler, P.Marketing Management (9th ed). New York, NY: Prentice Hall (2000).Google Scholar
Lakonishok, J.; Shleifer, A.; andVishny, R.Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and Risk.” Journal of Finance, 49 (1994), 15411578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, V., and Jacobson, R.Stock Market Reactions to Brand Extension Announcements: The Effects of Brand Attitude and Familiarity.” Journal of Marketing, 59 (1995), 6377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, J., and Servaes, H.Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value.” Journal of Financial Economics, 27 (1990), 595612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R.A Simple Model of Capital Market Equilibrium with Incomplete Information.” Journal of Finance, 42 (1987), 483510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ofek, E.Capital Structure and Firm Response to Poor Performance: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics, 34 (1993), 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseeuw, P.Least Median of Squares Regression.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79 (1984), 871880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseeuw, P., and Leroy, A.Robust Regression and Outlier Detection New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C., and Watts, R.The Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation Policies.” Journal of Financial Economics, 32 (1992), 263292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starks, L.Performance Incentive Fees: An Agency Theoretic Approach.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 22 (1987), 1732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statman, M.Socially Responsible Mutual Funds.” Financial Analysts Journal, 56 (2000), 3039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D.Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability.” Cognitive Psychology, 5 (1973), 207232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. “Judgments of and by Representativeness.” In Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A., eds. New York, NY: Cambridge Univ. Press (1982).Google Scholar
White, H.A Heteroscedasticity-Consistent Covariance-Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test of Heteroscedasticity.” Econometrica, 48 (1980), 817838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, R., and Lombard, J. JrFiduciary Responsibility in Investments.” Trusts and Estates, 81 (1985), 1418.Google Scholar