Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T12:57:16.737Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Convertible Debt Financing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Extract

The evolution of corporate capital structure theory in the literature of finance has been marked by the development of an increasingly imaginative rendition of market processes under conditions of uncertainty. Trade-offs between debt and equity sources of financing, and their consequent impact on shareholder wealth, have been the major concern. While the evolution is by no means complete, the notion of an efficient capital market in which investor decisions are focused on security portfolio building activities has provided significant insights into the range of opportunities open to corporate management to enhance share valuation through enlightened financing decisions. One measure of the gap between theory and application, however, can be found in the topics which thus far have not been effectively comprehended in the literature, even though the analytical technology is clearly available. Among those topics is the question of convertible debt financing as a capital structure component. The treatment of such a funds source remains essentially in the realm of folklore, the typical story being that convertibles contain the “best elements” of both equity and straight debt or that they provide a vehicle for issuing equity at a “bonus” price higher than the current price. Closer examination reveals that either view is arrant nonsense, and it is to a demonstration of this point that the present paper is addressed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Black, F., and Scholes, M.. “The Valuation of Option Contracts and a Test of Market Efficiency.” Journal of Finance, May 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Brennan, M. J.Taxes, Market Valuation, and Corporate Financial Policy.” National Tax Journal, December 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Chen, A. H. Y.A Model of Warrant Pricing in a Dynamic Market.” Journal of Finance, December 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Hamada, R. S.Portfolio Analysis, Market Equilibrium, and Corporate Finance.Journal of Finance, March 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Haugen, R. A., and Pappas, J. L.. “Equilibrium in the Pricing of Capital Assets, Risk-Bearing Debt Instruments, and the Question of Optimal Capital Structure.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, June 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Heins, A. J., and Sprenkle, C. M.. “A Comment on the Modigliani-Miller Cost of Capital Thesis.American Economic Review, September 1969.Google Scholar
[7]Lewellen, W. G.The Cost of Capital. Wadsworth, 1969.Google Scholar
[8]Merton, R. C.The Theory of Rational Option Pricing.Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Spring 1973.Google Scholar
[9]Modigliani, F., and Miller, M. H.. “The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance, and the Theory of Investment.American Economic Review, June 1958.Google Scholar
[10]Modigliani, F.Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Correction.American Economic Review, June 1963.Google Scholar
[11]Modigliani, F.Reply to Heins and Sprenkle.American Economic Review, September 1969.Google Scholar
[12]Mossin, J.Security Pricing and Investment Criteria in Competitive Markets.American Economic Review, December 1969.Google Scholar
[13]Samuelson, P. A.Rational Theory of Warrant Pricing.Industrial Management Review, Spring 1965.Google Scholar
[14]Stiglitz, J. E.A Re-Examination of the Modigliani-Miller Theorem.American Economic Review, December 1969.Google Scholar