Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T05:03:13.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Derivative Security Markets, Market Manipulation, and Option Pricing Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Robert A. Jarrow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper studies a new theory for pricing options in a large trader economy. This theory necessitates studying the impact that derivative security markets have on market manipulation. In an economy with a stock, money market account, and a derivative security, it is shown, by example, that the introduction of the derivative security generates market manipulation trading strategies that would otherwise not exist. A sufficient condition is provided on the price process such that no additional market manipulation trading strategies are introduced by a derivative security. Options are priced under this condition, where it is shown that the standard binomial option model still applies but with random volatilities.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 241 - 261
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

F., Allen, and Gale, D.. ”Stock Price Manipulation.” Review of Financial Studies, 5 (3, 1992), 503–529.Google Scholar
Back, K. “Asymmetric Information and Options.” Unpubl. Manuscript, Washington Univ. in St. Louis (1992).Google Scholar
Bagnoli, M., and Lipman, B.. “Stock Price Manipulation through Takeover Bids.” Unpubl. Manuscript, Univ. of Michigan (1989).Google Scholar
Bensaid, B.; Lesne, J. P.; Pages, H.; and Scheinkman, J.. “Derivative Asset Pricing with Transaction Costs.” Mathematical Finance, 2 (2, 1992), 63–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, F. “Bluffing.” Unpubl. Manuscript, New York, NY: Goldman-Sachs (1990).Google Scholar
Follmer, H., and Schweizer, M.. “Hedging of Contingent Claims under Incomplete Information.” In Applied Stochastic Analysis, Davis, M. H. A. and Elliott, R. J., eds. New York, NY: Gordon and Breach (1991), 389–414.Google Scholar
Gastineau, G., and Jarrow, R.. “Large Trader Impact and Market Regulation.” Financial Analysts Journal, 47 (07–08 1991), 40–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, J. M., and Pliska, S.. “Martingales and Stochastic Integrals in the Theory of Continuous Trading.” Stochastic Processes and Their Applications, 11 (1981), 215–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, N.; Platen, E.; and Schweizer, M.. “Option Pricing under Incompleteness and Stochastic Volatility.” Mathematical Finance, 2 (3, 1992), 153–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrow, R. “Market Manipulation, Bubbles, Corners, and Short Squeezes.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27 (09 1992), 311–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrow, R., and Rudd, A.. Option Pricing. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc. (1983).Google Scholar
Rubinstein, M. “Nonparametric Tests of Alternative Option Pricing Models Using All Reported Trades and Quotes on the 30 Most Active CBOE Option Classes from August 23, 1976, through August 31, 1978.” Journal of Finance, 40 (2, 1985), 455–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar