Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T12:05:39.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early Exercise Decision in American Options with Dividends, Stochastic Volatility, and Jumps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2018

Antonio Cosma Open the ORCID record for Antonio Cosma [Opens in a new window] ,
Stefano Galluccio ,
Paola Pederzoli  and
Olivier Scaillet Open the ORCID record for Olivier Scaillet [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using a fast numerical technique, we investigate a large database of investors’ suboptimal nonexercise of short-maturity American call options on dividend-paying stocks listed on the Dow Jones. The correct modeling of the discrete dividend is essential for a correct calculation of the early exercise boundary, as confirmed by theoretical insights. Pricing with stochastic volatility and jumps instead of the Black–Scholes–Merton benchmark cuts the amount lost by investors through suboptimal exercise by one-quarter. The remaining three-quarters are largely unexplained by transaction fees and may be interpreted as an opportunity cost for the investors to monitor optimal exercise.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 55 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 331 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

We thank Jarrad Harford (the editor) and Gurdip Bakshi (the referee) for constructive criticism and numerous suggestions, which led to substantial improvements over the previous version. We also thank Jérôme Detemple, Darrell Duffie, Emmanuel Gobet, Jens Jackwerth, Franck Moraux, David Newton, Adrien Treccani, and Alfonso Valdesogo for valuable insight and help in addition to the participants at the 2010 and the 2016 World Congress of the Bachelier Finance Society, the 2011 European Econometric Society, the 2013 Mathematical Finance Day, the 2014 Conference on Mathematical and Statistical Methods for Actuarial Sciences and Finance, the 2014 International Symposium on Differential Equations and Stochastic Analysis in Mathematical Finance, the 2015 General Advanced Mathematical Methods in Finance and Swissquote Conference, the 2015 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering and Economics, the 2015 International Conference on Computational and Financial Econometrics, the 2015 International Conference on Computational Finance, the 2016 SGF Conference, the 2016 Financial Engineering and Risk Management Symposium, the 2016 French Finance Association (AFFI) conference, the 2016 Stochmod16 conference, the 2016 European Finance Association meeting, and seminars at the University of Geneva and the University of Orléans. Scaillet received support from the Swiss National Science Foundation through the National Centres of Competence in Research (NCCR) Finrisk. Pederzoli acknowledges the financial support of the Swiss NSF (grant 100018-149307). Part of the research was conducted when Pederzoli was visiting London School of Economics. A previous version of this paper circulated under the title “Valuing American Options Using Fast Recursive Projections.”

References

Adolfsson, T.; Chiarella, C.; Ziogas, A.; and Ziveyi, J.. “Representation and Numerical Approximation of American Option Prices under Heston Stochastic Volatility Dynamics.” Research Paper 327, University of Technology Sidney Quantitative Finance Research Centre (2013).Google Scholar
Amin, K. I.“Jump Diffusion Option Valuation in Discrete Time.” Journal of Finance, 48 (1993), 1833–1863.Google Scholar
Andersen, T. G.; Fusari, N.; and Todorov, V.. “The Risk Premia Embedded in Index Options.” Journal of Financial Economics, 117 (2015), 558–584.Google Scholar
Andersen, T. G.; Fusari, N.; and Todorov, V.. “Short-Term Market Risks Implied by Weekly Options.” Journal of Finance, 72 (2017), 1335–1386.Google Scholar
Andricopoulos, A. D.; Widdicks, M.; Newton, D. P.; and Duck, P. W.. “Extending Quadrature Methods to Value Multi-Asset and Complex Path Dependent Options.” Journal of Financial Economics, 83 (2007), 471–499.Google Scholar
Bakshi, G.; Cao, C.; and Chen, Z.. “Empirical Performance of Alternative Option Pricing Models.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 2003–2049.Google Scholar
Bakshi, G.; Kapadia, N.; and Madan, D.. “Stock Return Characteristics, Skew Laws, and the Differential Pricing of Individual Equity Options.” Review of Financial Studies, 16 (2003), 101–143.Google Scholar
Barraclough, K., and Whaley, R. E.. “Early Exercise of Put Options on Stocks.” Journal of Finance, 67 (2012), 1423–1456.Google Scholar
Bates, D. S.“Jumps and Stochastic Volatility: Exchange Rate Processes Implicit in Deutsche Mark Options.” Review of Financial Studies, 9 (1996), 69–107.Google Scholar
Black, F., and Scholes, M.. “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities.” Journal of Political Economy, 81 (1973), 637–654.Google Scholar
Bollen, N. P. B., and Whaley, R. E.. “Does Net Buying Pressure Affect the Shape of Implied Volatility Functions?” Journal of Finance, 59 (2004), 711–753.Google Scholar
Broadie, M.; Chernov, M.; and Johannes, M.. “Model Specification and Risk Premia: Evidence from Futures Options.” Journal of Finance, 62 (2007), 1453–1490.Google Scholar
Chen, D.; Härkönen, H. J.; and Newton, D. P.. “Advancing the Universality of Quadrature Methods to Any Underlying Process for Option Pricing.” Journal of Financial Economics, 114 (2014), 600–612.Google Scholar
Christoffersen, P.; Fournier, M.; and Jacobs, K.. “The Factor Structure in Equity Options.” Review of Financial Studies, 31 (2017), 595–637.Google Scholar
Christoffersen, P.; Goyenko, R.; Jacobs, K.; and Karoui, M.. “Illiquidity Premia in the Equity Options Market.” Review of Financial Studies, 31 (2017), 811–851.Google Scholar
Christoffersen, P., and Jacobs, K.. “The Importance of the Loss Function in Option Valuation.” Journal of Financial Economics, 72 (2004), 291–318.Google Scholar
Cosma, A.; Galluccio, S.; Pederzoli, P.; and Scaillet, O.. “Early Exercise Decision in American Options with Dividends, Stochastic Volatility and Jumps.” Research Paper No. 16-73, Swiss Finance Institute (2016).Google Scholar
Detemple, J. B.; Garcia, R.; and Rindisbacher, M.. “A Monte Carlo Method for Optimal Portfolios.” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 401–446.Google Scholar
Eraker, B.; Johannes, M.; and Polson, N.. “The Impact of Jumps in Volatility and Returns.” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 1269–1300.Google Scholar
Fang, F., and Oosterlee, C. W.. “A Fourier-Based Valuation Method for Bermudan and Barrier Options under Heston’s Model.” SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, 2 (2011), 439–463.Google Scholar
Griebsch, S. A.“The Evaluation of European Compound Option Prices under Stochastic Volatility Using Fourier Transform Techniques.” Review of Derivatives Research, 16 (2013), 135–165.Google Scholar
Hagan, P. S.; Kumar, D.; Lesniewski, A. S.; and Woodward, D. E.. “Managing Smile Risk.” WILMOTT Magazine, 1 (2002), 84–108.Google Scholar
Haug, E. G.; Haug, J.; and Lewis, A.. “Back to Basics: A New Approach to the Discrete Dividend Problem.” WILMOTT Magazine, 9 (2003), 37–47.Google Scholar
Heston, S. L.“A Closed-Form Solution for Options with Stochastic Volatility with Applications to Bond and Currency Options.” Review of Financial Studies, 6 (1993), 327–343.Google Scholar
Hodder, J. E., and Jackwerth, J. C.. “Incentive Contracts and Hedge Fund Management.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42 (2007), 811–826.Google Scholar
Hull, J. Options, Futures and Other Derivatives, 9th global ed. Edinburgh, UK: Pearson Education (2018).Google Scholar
Hull, J., and White, A.. “The Pricing of Options on Assets with Stochastic Volatilities.” Journal of Finance, 42 (1987), 281–300.Google Scholar
Jamshidian, F.“An Analysis of American Options.” Review of Futures Markets, 11 (1992), 72–80.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. V., and Pedersen, L. H.. “Early Option Exercise: Never Say Never.” Journal of Financial Economics, 121 (2016), 278–299.Google Scholar
Kelly, B.; Lustig, H.; and Van Nieuwerburgh, S.. “Too-Systemic-to-Fail: What Option Markets Imply about Sector-Wide Government Guarantees.” American Economic Review, 106 (2016b), 1278–1319.Google Scholar
Kelly, B.; Pástor, L.; and Veronesi, P.. “The Price of Political Uncertainty: Theory and Evidence from the Option Market.” Journal of Finance, 71 (2016a), 2417–2480.Google Scholar
Kim, I.“The Analytic Valuation of American Options.” Review of Financial Studies, 3 (1990), 547–572.Google Scholar
Merton, R. C.“Option Pricing When Underlying Stock Returns Are Discontinuous.” Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (1976), 125–144.Google Scholar
Pool, V. K.; Stoll, H. R.; and Whaley, R. E.. “Failure to Exercise Call Options: An Anomaly and a Trading Game.” Journal of Financial Markets, 11 (2008), 1–35.Google Scholar
Stanton, R.“Rational Prepayment and the Valuation of Mortgage-Backed Securities.” Review of Financial Studies, 8 (1995), 677–708.Google Scholar
West, G.“Calibration of the SABR Model in Illiquid Markets.” Applied Mathematical Finance, 12 (2005), 371–385.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Cosma et al. supplementary material

Cosma et al. supplementary material
Download Cosma et al. supplementary material(File)
File 545.7 KB