Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T07:57:56.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimating the Signaling Benefits of Debt Insurance: The Case of Municipal Bonds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

David S. Kidwell ,
Eric H. Sorensen  and
John M. Wachowicz Jr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the demand for municipal bond insurance in the context of a competitive signaling equilibrium model. The study compares the pricing of new bond issues that are insured to similar issues that are not insured. The results indicate that issuers who purchase bond insurance, on average, are able to reduce their new issue borrowing cost more than enough to offset the cost of the insurance premium. Furthermore, the net benefit to the issuer increases as the underlying credit quality of the bond declines.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , September 1987 , pp. 299 - 313
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Benson, E. D. “The Search for Information by Underwriters and its Impact on Municipal Interest Cost.” Journal of Finance, 34 (09 1979), 871–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Bhattacharya, S. “Nondissipative Signaling Structures and Dividend Policy.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 95 (08 1980), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Braswell, R. C.; Nosari, E. J.; and Browning, M. A.. “The Effect of Private Municipal Bond Insurance on the Cost to the Issuer.” Financial Review, 17 (11 1982), 240–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Carr, F. C.Municipal Bond Insurance. Special Bulletin, New York: Municipal Finance Officers Association (03 16, 1972).Google Scholar
[8]Forbes, R. W., and Hopewell, M. H.. “Private Municipal Bond Insurance: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis.” Paper presented at the Western Economic Association Meeting, San Francisco, CA (1976).Google Scholar
[9]Forbes, R. W., and Leonard, P. A.. “The Effects of Statutory Portfolio Constraints on Tax-Exempt Interest Rates.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 16 (02 1984), 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Hendershott, P. H., and Kidwell, D. S.. “The Impact of Relative Security Supplies: A Test with Data from a Regional Tax-Exempt Bond Market.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 10 (08 1978), 337–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Hopewell, M., and Kaufman, G.. “Commercial Bank Bidding on Municipal Revenue Bonds: New Evidence.” Journal of Finance, 32 (12 1977), 1647–1656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Joehnk, M. D., and Kidwell, D. S.. “Determining the Advantages and Disadvantages of Private Municipal Bond Guarantees.” Governmental Finance, 7 (02 1978), 30–36.Google Scholar
[13]Joehnk, M. D., and Kidwell, D. S.. “The Impact of Market Uncertainty on Municipal Underwriting Cost.” Financial Management, 13 (Spring 1984), 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Joehnk, M. D., and Minge, D.. “Guaranteed Municipal Bonds—Their Performance and Evaluation.” Review of Business and Economic Research, 12 (Fall 1976), 1–18.Google Scholar
[15]Kelly, P. P.Municipal Bond Insurance: An Evaluation. New York: Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Fixed Income Research Dept. (01 1980).Google Scholar
[16]Kessel, R. “A Study of the Effects of Competition in the Tax-Exempt Bond Market.” Journal of Political Economy, 79 (07–08 1971), 706–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Kidwell, D. S.; Koch, T. W.; and Stock, D. R.. “The Impact of State Income Taxes on Municipal Borrowing Costs.” National Tax Journal, 37 (12 1984), 551–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Kidwell, D. S., and Koch, T. W.. “The Behavior of the Interest Rate Differential between Tax-Exempt Revenue and General Obligation Bonds: A Test of Risk Preferences and Market Segmentation.” Journal of Finance, 37 (03 1982), 73–85.Google Scholar
[19]Metz, R. “Insurers' Effect on Municipals.” The New York Times, (07 26, 1982), D6.Google Scholar
[20]Miralia, L. “Municipal Bond Insurance Gaining in Acceptance.” ABA Banking Journal, 72 (02 1980), 63–66.Google Scholar
[21]Ross, S. A. “The Determination of Financial Structure: The Incentive Signaling Approach.” The Bell Journal of Economics, 8 (Spring 1977), 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Rothschild, M., and Stiglitz, J.. “Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: An Essay on the Economics of Imperfect Information.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90 (11 1976), 629–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Rubinfeld, D. “Credit Ratings and the Market for General Obligation Municipal Bonds.” National Tax Journal, 26 (03 1973), 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Sorensen, E. H. “An Analysis of the Relationship between Underwriter Spread and the Pricing of Municipal Bonds.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 15 (06 1980), 435–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25]Sorensen, E. H. “Negotiated Municipal Bond Underwritings: Implications for Efficiency.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 11 (08 1979), 366–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26]Sorensen, E. H. “Bond Ratings vs. Market Risk Premiums.” Journal of Portfolio Management, 6 (Spring 1980), 64–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27]Spence, M. “Job Market Signaling.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87 (08 1973), 355–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[28]Thakor, A. V. “An Exploration of Competitive Signaling Equilibria with ‘Third Party’ Information Production: The Case of Debt Insurance.” The Journal of Finance, 37 (06 1982), 717–739.Google Scholar