Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T14:45:08.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Extensions to Portfolio Theory to Reflect Vast Wealth Differences among Investors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Christopher A. Hessel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Much of modern portfolio theory rests on conclusions drawn from the original form of the Capital Asset Pricing Model. Fundamental to the conclusions of this model is the assumption of perfect competition among investors; i.e., all investors possess approximately the same small amount of wealth such that equilibrium price cannot be influenced significantly by the demand of any of the investors. Today's security market, however, is characterized by individuals and large institutional investors such as insurance companies and investment funds. Although institutions represent a very small fraction of all investors in the market, institutional investors in 1977 held 34.3 percent of all outstanding stock. By the very magnitude of the dollar transactions effected by these large investors, prices can and are affected dramatically. Because today's security market is composed of investors exhibiting extreme differences in wealth, the United States securities market probably is not perfectly competitive as assumed in portfolio theory. Consequently, investment theory must be extended to reflect vast wealth differences among investors. To achieve this end, modifications are made to the original Capital Asset Pricing Model. Equilibrium conditions are examined and conclusions are drawn as to how portfolio theory must be altered to include price affecting ability by a segment of the investors in the market.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , March 1981 , pp. 53 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Cournot, A.Research in Mathematical Principles of Theory of Wealth. New York: MacMillan (1897).Google Scholar
[2]Debreu, and Scarf, . “A Limit Theorem on the Core of an Economy.” International Economic Review (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Fama, E., and Miller, M.. The Theory of Finance. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston (1972).Google Scholar
[4]Hessel, C. A. “The Effects of Taxes and Imperfect Competition on an Investor's Optimum Portfolio.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, New York University (06 1979).Google Scholar
[5]James, J. A. “Portfolio Selection with an Imperfectly Competitive Asset Market.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (12 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Lindenberg, E. B. “Imperfect Competition among Investors in Security Markets.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. New York University (1976).Google Scholar
[7]Lindenberg, E. B.. “Capital Market Equilibrium with Price Affecting Institutional Investors.” 25 Years After-Essays in Honor of Harry Markowitz, Management Science (Fall 1979).Google Scholar
[8]Mossin, J. “Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market.” Econometrica (10 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Mossin, J.. The Theory of Financial Markets. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall (1973).Google Scholar