Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T10:27:46.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Information Inaccuracy of Stock Market Forecasts: Some New Evidence of Dependence on the New York Stock Exchange

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Extract

Some recent research into the short-term behavior of speculative prices has combined the methodology of information theory with the analysis of aggregate market data on the daily proportions of securities advancing, declining, and remaining unchanged in price. For example, Theil and Leenders [8] employed the measure of average information inaccuracy to analyze aggregate data on the Amsterdam Stock Exchange and concluded that there was a strong dependence between the proportions of prices advancing, declining, and remaining unchanged today, and the respective changes tomorrow. The evidence of dependence on the Amsterdam Exchange prompted Fama [4] to apply similar methodology on the NYSE data, for the period 6/2/52 to 10/29/62, in search of similar patterns. Professor Fama, after proper adjustment for nonstationarity in the time series, concluded that the evidence of dependence on the NYSE was meager and unreliable for forecasting short-term security prices. However, Dryden [3], utilizing the same methodology on data from the London Stock Exchange, found significant dependence between the proportions advancing, declining, and remaining unchanged today, and the respective changes tomorrow. Dryden's results yielded a higher dependence for the London Exchange than for the Amsterdam and New York Exchanges, and were later verified by the straightforward application of a Markovian approach.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Cheng, Pao L., and Deets, M. King. “Portfolio Returns and the Random Walk Theory.” Journal of Finance, March 1971, pp. 1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Dryden, Myles M. “Share Price Movements: A Markovian Approach.” Journal of Finance, March 1969, pp. 4960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Dryden, Myles M. “Short-Term Forecasting of Share Prices: An Information Theory Approach.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, November 1968, pp. 227249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Fama, Eugene F. “Tomorrow on the New York Stock Exchange.” Journal of Business, July 1965, pp. 285299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Friend, I.; Blume, M.; and Crockett, J.. Mutual Funds and Other Institutional Investors: A New Perspective. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1970.Google Scholar
[6]Kintchin, A. I.Mathematical Foundations of Information Theory. New York: Dover Publications, 1957.Google Scholar
[7]Kullback, Solomon. Information Theory and Statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1959.Google Scholar
[8]Theil, H., and Leenders, C. T.. “Tomorrow on the Amsterdam Stock Exchange.” Journal of Business, July 1965, pp. 277284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar