Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T07:27:42.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring True Stock Index Value in the Presence of Infrequent Trading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Esa Jokivuolle
Esa Jokivuolle
Affiliation:
Department of Finance, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, and Department of Economics, P.O. Box 54, FIN-00014, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Based on the Beveridge-Nelson (1981) decomposition of an ARIMA process, I present a measure of true stock index value that is not directly observable due to infrequent trading of stocks. The technique is illustrated with daily observations of the Russell 2000 index. This new measure might well prove useful in studies of lead-lag relationships between index derivatives and spot market and futures basis measurements.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , September 1995 , pp. 455 - 464
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bassett, G. W. Jr.; France, V. G.; and Pliska, S. R.. “Kaiman Filter Estimation for Valuing Nontrading Securities, with Applications to the MMI Cash-Future Spread on October 19 and 20,1987.” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 1 (1991), 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beveridge, S., and Nelson, C. R.. “A New Approach to Decomposition of Economic Time Series into Permanent and Transitory Components with Particular Attention to Measurement of the Business Cycle.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 7 (1981), 151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blume, M. E.; MacKinley, A. C.; and Terker, B.. “Order Imbalances and Stock Price Movements on October 19 and 20, 1987.” Journal of Finance, 44 (1989), 827–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochrane, J. H. “How Big is the Random Walk in GNP?” Journal of Political Economy, 96 (1988), 893–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, K. J.; Maier, S. A.; Schwartz, R. A.; and Whitcomb, D. K.. The Microstructure of Securities Markets. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall (1986).Google Scholar
Granger, C. W. J., and Newbold, P.. Forecasting Economic Time Series, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc. (1986).Google Scholar
Harris, L. “The October 1987 S&P 500 Stock Index Basis.” Journal of Finance, 44 (1989), 77–100.Google Scholar
Lo, A., and MacKinley, A. C.. “Stock Market Prices Do Not Follow Random Walks: Evidence from a Simple Specification Test.” Review of Financial Studies, 1 (Spring 1988), 41–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, A., and MacKinley, A. C.. “An Econometric Analysis of Nonsynchronous Trading.” Journal of Econometrics, 45 (1990), 181–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M. H.; Muthuswamy, J.; and Whaley, R. E.. “Mean Reversion of Standard & Poor's 500 Index Basis Changes: Arbitrage-Induced or Statistical Illusion?” Journal of Finance, 49 (1994), 479–513.Google Scholar
Newbold, P. “Precise and Efficient Computation of the Beveridge-Nelson Decomposition of Economic Time Series.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 26 (1990), 453–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostdiek, B. B.; Fleming, F.; and Whaley, R. E.. “The Integration of Stock, Futures, and Option Market Returns.” Unpubl. Manuscript, Fuqua School of Business, Duke Univ. (1992).Google Scholar
Pere, P.Integrated and Cointegrated Time Series. The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, C 58 (1990).(in Finnish).Google Scholar
Stoll, H. R., and Whaley, R. E.. “The Dynamics of Stock Index and Stock Index Futures Returns.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 25 (1990), 441–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar