Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T17:38:18.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mixed Security Testing of Alternative Portfolio Selection Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Gordon J. Alexander
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The general framework employed in analyzing diversification among securities involves the mean-variance theory of portfolio selection described by Markowitz [8]. Observation of the securities comprising the efficient set indicates which financial sssets possess attributes (i.e., expected return and covariances) making them worthwhile components of an optimally diversified portfolio. This paper will be concerned with forming an efficient set from four security classes—common stocks, preferred stocks, corporate bonds, and U.S. government bonds (hereafter denoted CS, PS, CB, and GB, respectively). The first objective will be to derive and analyze an efficient set from a sample of these securities in order to determine which securities have potential benefits for diversification.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 12 , Issue 5 , December 1977 , pp. 817 - 832
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Cohen, Kalman J., and Pogue, Gerald A.. “An Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Portfolio-Selection Models.” Journal of Business, vol. 40 (April 1967), pp. 166–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Fisher, Lawrence. “Some New Stock Market Indices.” Journal of Business, vol. 39 (Supplement, January 1966), pp. 191–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Fisher, Lawrence, and Weil, Roman L.. “Coping with the Risk of Interest Rate Fluctuations: Returns to Bondholders from Naive and Optimal Strategies.” Journal of Business, vol. 44 (October 1971), pp. 408–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Herzog, John P. “Investor Experience in Corporate Securities: A New Technique for Measurement.” Journal of Finance, vol. 19 (March 1964), pp. 46–62.Google Scholar
[5]Lessard, Donald E. “International Portfolio Diversification: A Multivariate Analysis for a Group of Latin American Countries.” Journal of Finance, vol. 28 (June 1973), pp. 619–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]McEnally, Richard W. “Risk-Premium Curves for Different Classes of Long-Term Securities, 1950–1966: Comment.” Journal of Finance, vol 27 (September 1972), pp. 933–939.Google Scholar
[7]McEnally, Richard W. “Some Portfolio-Relevant Risk Characteristics of Long-Term Marketable Securities.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 8 (September 1973), pp. 565–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Markowitz, Harry M. “Portfolio Selection.” Journal of Finance, vol. 7 (March 1952), pp. 77–91.Google Scholar
[9]Norgaard, Richard L. “An Examination of the Yields of Corporate Bonds and Stocks.” Journal of Finance, vol. 29 (September 1974), pp. 1275–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Robichek, Alexander A.; Cohn, Richard A.; and Pringle, John J.. “Returns on Alternative Investment Media and Implications for Portfolio Construction.” Journal of Business, vol. 45 (July 1972), pp. 427–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Sarnat, Marshall. “Capital Market Imperfections and the Composition of Optimal Portfolios.” Journal of Finance, vol. 29 (September 1974), pp. 1241–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Sharpe, William F. “A Simplified Model for Portfolio Analysis.” Management Science, vol. 9 (January 1963), pp. 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Soldofsky, Robert M. “Ex Ante and Ex Post Yields on Bonds: Concepts and Measurements.” Mississippi Valley Journal of Business and Economics, vol. 5 (Spring 1970), pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
[14]Soldofsky, Robert M., and Miller, Roger L.. “Risk Premium Curves for Different Classes of Long Term Securities, 1950–1966.” Journal of Finance, vol. 24 (June 1960), pp. 429–445.Google Scholar
[15]Soldofsky, Robert M.,. “Reply.” Journal of Finance, vol. 27 (September 1972), pp. 940–943.Google Scholar
[16]Wallingford, Buckner A. “A Survey and Comparison of Portfolio Selection Models.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 2 (June 1967), pp. 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar