Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T06:29:34.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Option Pricing in a Multi-Asset, Complete Market Economy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Ren-Raw Chen ,
San-Lin Chung  and
Tyler T. Yang
Ren-Raw Chen
Affiliation:
rchen@rci.rutgers.edu, Rutgers Business School, Rutgers University, 94 Rockafeller Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854
San-Lin Chung
Affiliation:
chungs@mgt.ncu.edu.tw, Department of Finance, National Central University, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Tyler T. Yang
Affiliation:
tyler.yang@ifegroup.com, IFE Group, 51 Monroe Street, Plaza E6, Rockville, MD 20850.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper extends the seminal Cox-Ross-Rubinstein ((1979), CRR hereafter) binomial model to multiple assets. It differs from previous models in that it is derived under the complete market environment specified by Duffie and Huang (1985) and He (1990).

The complete market assumption requires the number of states to grow linearly with the number of assets. However, the number of correlations grows at a faster rate, causing the CRR model to be indirectly extendable. We solve such a problem by recognizing that the fast growing correlation number is matched by the number of the angles of the edges of a hypercube spanned by the risky assets. As a result, we derive a solution that allows the number of equations to equal the number of risky assets and the riskless bond. The resulting tree structure hence provides the same intuition of pricing and hedging contingent claims as that provided by the CRR model.

Finally, the proposed model is not only as easy to implement as the one-dimensional CRR model but also it is more memory efficient than the existing multi-factor lattice models.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , December 2002 , pp. 649 - 666
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amin, K. “On the Computation of Continuous Time Option Prices Using Discrete Approximations.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 26 (1991), 477–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barraquand, J., and Martineau, D.. “Numerical Valuation of High Dimensional Multivariate American Securities.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 30 (1995), 383–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, P. “A Lattice Framework for Option Pricing with Two State Variables.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 23 (1988), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, P.; Evnine, J.; and Gibbs, S.. “Numerical Evaluations of Multivariate Contingent Claims.” Review of Financial Studies, 2 (1989), 241–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, P., and Tse, Y.. “An Algorithm for Computing Values of Options on the Maximum or Minimum of Several Assets.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 25 (1990), 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, R., and Scott, L.. “Pricing Interest Rate Options in a Two Factor Cox-Ingersoll-Ross Model of the Term Structure.” Review of Financial Studies, 5 (1992), 613–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clewlow, L., and Strickland, C.. Implementing Derivatives Models. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons (1999).Google Scholar
Cox, J.; Ross, S.; and Rubinstein, M.. “Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach.” Journal of Financial Economics, 7 (1979), 44–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffie, D., and Huang, C.. “Implementing Arrow-Debreu Equilibria by Continuous Trading of Few Long Lived Securities.” Econometrica, 53 (1985), 1337–1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, S. “Call Option Pricing when the Exercise Price Is Uncertain, and the Valuation of Index Bonds.” Journal of Finance, 33 (1978), 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, H. “Convergence from Discrete to Continuous Time Contingent Claims Prices.” Review of Financial Studies, 3 (1990), 523–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heston, S., and Zhou, G.. “On the Rate of Convergence of Discrete Time Contingent Claims.” Mathematical Finance, 10 (2000), 53–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, T.; Stapleton, R.; and Subrahmanyam, M., “Multivariate Binomial Approximations for Asset Prices with Nonstationary Variance and Covariance Characteristics.” Review of Financial Studies, 8 (1995), 1125–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, J., and White, A.. “Valuing Derivative Securities Using the Explicit Finite Difference Method.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 25 (1990), 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, H. “Options on the Maximum or the Minimum of Several Assets.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 22 (1987), 277–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joy, C.; Boyle, P.; and Tan, K. S.. “Quasi Monte Carlo Methods in Numerical Finance.” Management Science, 42 (1996), 926–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamrad, B., and Ritchken, P.. “Multinomial Approximating Models for Options with k State Variables.” Management Science, 37 (1991), 1640–1652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MaCarthy, L., and Webber, N.. “An Icosahedral Lattice Method for Three-Factor Models.” Working Paper, Univ. of South Wales and Univ. of Warwick (1999).Google Scholar
Madan, D.; Milne, F.; and Shefrin, H.. “The Multinomial Option Pricing Model and Its Brownian and Poisson Limits.” Review of Financial Studies, 2 (1989), 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margrabe, W. “The Value of an Option to Exchange One Asset for Another.” Journal of Finance, 33 (1978), 177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, F., and Turnbull, S.. “A General Theory of Asset Pricing.” Unpubl. Manuscript, Queen's Univ. (1997).Google Scholar
Rendleman, R., and Bartter, B.. “Two-State Option Pricing.” Journal of Finance, 34 (1979), 1093–1110.Google Scholar
Sharpe, W.Investments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall (1976).Google Scholar
Tavella, D., and Randall, C.. Pricing Financial Instruments: The Finite Difference Method. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons (2000).Google Scholar