Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T11:57:01.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Ownership Complaint Gap: Mutual versus Stock Intermediaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2019

Jiang Cheng
Affiliation:
Cheng, jiangcheng@ln.edu.hk, Lingnan University
Wenlan Qian
Affiliation:
Qian, wenlan.qian@nus.edu.sg, National University of Singapore
David M. Reeb*
Affiliation:
Reeb, dmreeb@nus.edu.sg, National University of Singapore
*
Reeb (corresponding author), dmreeb@nus.edu.sg

Abstract

We document a substantial customer complaint gap between stock and mutual financial firms. To assess whether this 21% per year complaint gap stems from complaint-prone customers in stock insurers, we examine state-adjudicated complaint success. To further delineate between customer selection or treatment explanations, we exploit within insurer complaints around random claims (natural disasters) and attention shocks (media scrutiny). Further tests reveal the complaint gap widens with greater competition, near insolvency thresholds, and with more price regulation. Overall, the results are inconsistent with the hypothesis that mutual financial firms exhibit low customer satisfaction, suggesting customers find this a beneficial organizational structure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We benefited from discussions and comments by Sumit Agarwal, Gilles Hilary, Jennifer Huang, Amir Kermani, Ron Masulis, Randall Morck, Mitchell Petersen, Jeffrey Pontiff (the referee), Rodney Ramcharan, Amit Seru, Johan Sulaeman, Bernard Yeung, and seminar participants at the 2017 American Economic Association meetings, the 2016 Homer Hoyt meeting, the 2016 Asian Bureau of Finance and Economics meeting, Australian National University, Baruch College, Hong Kong Chinese University, CKGSB, Hong Kong Baptist, Hong Kong Lingnan, HKUST, National University of Singapore, New York University, Peking University, University of Hong Kong, University of New South Wales, and the University of Technology Sydney. Cheng gratefully acknowledges the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71573164).

References

Agarwal, S.; Chomsisengphet, S.; Scholnick, B.; and Zhang, M.. “Salience and Peer Effects: Durable Good Choice after a Neighbor’s Warranty Claim” Working Paper, National University of Singapore (2018).Google Scholar
Balto, D.“Reviving Competition in Healthcare Markets: The Use of Section 5 of the FTC Act, Federal Trade Commission,” available at www.ftc.gov (2008).Google Scholar
Berger, A., and Hannan, T.. “The Efficiency Cost of Market Power in the Banking Industry: A Test of the Quiet Life and Related Hypotheses.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 80 (1998), 454465.Google Scholar
Bubb, R., and Kaufman, A.. “Consumer Biases and Mutual Ownership.” Journal of Public Economics, 105 (2013), 3957.Google Scholar
Cortes, K., and Strahan, P.. “Tracing Out Capital Flows: How Financially Integrated Banks Respond to Natural Disasters.” Journal of Financial Economics, 125 (2017), 182199.Google Scholar
Cummins, J.; Weiss, M.; and Zi, H.. “Organizational Form and Efficiency: The Coexistence of Stock and Mutual Property-Liability Insurers.” Management Science, 45 (1999), 12541269.Google Scholar
Dafny, L., and Ramanarayanan, S.. “Does It Matter If Your Health Insurer Is For-Profit: Effects of Ownership on Premiums, Coverage, and Medical Spending” Working Paper, Northwestern University and NBER (2013).Google Scholar
Doherty, N. A.; Kartasheva, A. V.; and Phillips, R. D.. “Information Effect of Entry into Credit Ratings Market: The Case of Insurers’ Ratings.” Journal of Financial Economics, 106 (2012), 308330.Google Scholar
Ellul, A.; Jotikasthira, C.; Lundblad, C. T.; and Wang, Y.. “Is Historical Cost Accounting a Panacea? Market Stress, Incentive Distortions, and Gains Trading.” Journal of Finance, 70 (2015), 24892537.Google Scholar
Erhemjamts, O., and Leverty, J.. “The Demise of the Mutual Organizational Form: An Investigation of the Life Insurance Industry.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 42 (2010), 10111036.Google Scholar
Fama, E., and Jensen, M.. “Separation of Ownership and Control.” Journal of Law and Economics, 26 (1983), 301325.Google Scholar
Glaeser, E., and Shleifer, A.. “Not-For-Profit Entrepreneurs.” Journal of Public Economics, 81 (2001), 99115.Google Scholar
Grace, M., and Leverty, J.. “Political Cost Incentives for Managing the Property Liability Insurer Loss Reserve.” Journal of Accounting Research, 48 (2010), 2149.Google Scholar
Grace, M., and Phillips, R.. “Regulator Performance, Regulatory Environment and Outcomes: An Examination of Insurance Regulator Career Incentives on State Insurance Markets.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 32 (2008), 116133.Google Scholar
Hansmann, H.The Organization of Insurance Companies: Mutual versus Stock.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1 (1985), 125153.Google Scholar
Harrington, S.Effects of Prior Approval Rate Regulation Auto Insurance.” In Deregulating Property-Liability Insurance, David Cummins, J., ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press (2002), 285314.Google Scholar
Israel, M.Services as Experience Goods: An Empirical Examination of Consumer Learning in Automobile Insurance.” American Economic Review, 95 (2005), 14441463.Google Scholar
Joskow, P.Cartels, Competition, and Regulation in the Property-Liability Insurance Industry.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4 (1973), 375427.Google Scholar
Ke, B.Taxes as a Determinant of Managerial Compensation in Privately Held Insurance Companies.” Accounting Review, 76 (2001), 655674.Google Scholar
Lamm-Tennant, J., and Starks, L. T.. “Stock versus Mutual Ownership Structures: The Risk Implications.” Journal of Business, 66 (1993), 2946.Google Scholar
Leverty, J. T., and Grace, M. F.. “Do Elections Delay Regulatory Action?Journal of Financial Economics, 130 (2018), 409427.Google Scholar
Lin, Y.; Yu, J.; and Peterson, M.. “Reinsurance Networks and Their Impact on Reinsurance Decisions: Theory and Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Risk and Insurance, 82 (2014), 531569.Google Scholar
Masulis, R.Changes in Ownership Structure: Conversions of Mutual Savings and Loans to Stock Charter.” Journal of Financial Economics, 18 (1987), 2959.Google Scholar
Mayers, D., and Smith, C.. “Contractual Provisions, Organizational Structure, and Conflict Control in Insurance Markets.” Journal of Business, 54 (1981), 407434.Google Scholar
Mayers, D., and Smith, C.. “Ownership Structure and Control: The Mutualization of Stock Life Insurance Companies.” Journal of Financial Economics, 16 (1986), 7398.Google Scholar
Mehrota, V.; Morck, R.; Shim, J.; and Wiwattanakantang, Y.. “Adoptive Expectations: Rising Sons in Japanese Family Firms.” Journal of Financial Economics, 108 (2013), 840854.Google Scholar
Mootz, F.The Sounds of Silence: Waiting for Courts to Acknowledge That Public Policy Justifies Awarding Damages to Third-Party Claimants When Liability Insurers Deal with Them in Bad Faith.” Nevada Law Journal, 2 (2002), 443488.Google Scholar
Pottier, S., and Sommer, D.. “Regulatory Stringency and New York Licensed Life Insurers.” Journal of Risk and Insurance, 65 (1998), 485502.Google Scholar
Rasmusen, E.Mutual Banks and Stock Banks.” Journal of Law and Economics, 31 (1988), 395421.Google Scholar
Shliefer, A., and Wolfenzon, D.. “Investor Protection and Equity Markets.” Journal of Financial Economics, 66 (2002), 327.Google Scholar
Wang, J.; Chang, V.; Lai, G.; and Tzeng, L.. “Demutualization and the Demand for Reinsurance.” The Geneva Papers, 33 (2008), 566584.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Cheng et al. supplementary material

Cheng et al. supplementary material

Download Cheng et al. supplementary material(File)
File 78.4 KB