Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T19:18:55.534Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Price Spreads, Performance, and the Seasoning of New Treasury and Agency Bond Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Extract

In equilibrium, each new capital asset must be priced properly relative to other assets. If an investor can also buy and sell assets in his portfolio costlessly and quickly, then the new asset will be accepted immediately and fully into the market and it will immediately behave as though it were a seasoned or previously available asset. However, it is often argued that recently issued bonds and seasoned or fully distributed bonds behave differently due to the frictions and risks associated with distributing a new security in the market. And it is also argued that recently issued bonds undergo a behavioral transformation as they become seasoned bonds. According to this argument there are significant empirical behavioral differences between recently issued bonds and seasoned bonds [4,5,7,9,13]. These differences disappear as the market gradually absorbs the new bond issue and the bond becomes “seasoned.”

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Barnard, Norman R. V. “Views of U.S. Government Securities Dealers.” Joint Treasury-Federal Reserve Study of the U.S. Government Securities Market, Staff Studies – Part I, Federal Reserve System (1970).Google Scholar
[2]Bildersee, John S.Some New Bond Indexes.” Journal of Business (October 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Bildersee, John S.U.S. Government and Agency Securities: An Analysis of Yield Spreads and Performance.” Journal of Business (forthcoming).Google Scholar
[4]Conard, Joseph W., and Frankena, Mark W.. “The Yield Spread between New and Seasoned Corporate Bonds, 1952–63.” In Essays on Interest Rates, Vol. 1, edited by Guttentag, J. N. and Cagan, P.. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research (1969).Google Scholar
[5]Ederington, Louis H.The Yield Spread on New Issues of Corporate Bonds.” Journal of Finance (December 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Fama, E. F.; Fisher, Lawrence; Jensen, Michael; and Roll, Richard. “The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information.” International Economic Review (February 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Frankena, Mark W. “The Influence of Call Provisions and Coupon Rate on the Yields of Corporate Bonds.” In Essays on Interest Rates, Vol. 2, edited by Guttentag, J. M. and Cagan, P.. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research (1971).Google Scholar
[8]Friend, Irwin, et al. Investment Banking and the New Issues Market. New York: World Publishing Co. (1967).Google Scholar
[9]Garbade, Kenneth D., and Silber, William L.. “Price Dispersion in the Government Securities Market.” Journal of Political Economy (July 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Mayer, Thomas. Monetary Policy in the United States. New York: Random House (1968).Google Scholar
[11]Scholes, Myron. “The Market for Securities: Substitution Versus Price Pressure and the Effects of Information on Share Prices.” Journal of Business (April 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Stoll, Hans, and Curley, A. J.. “Small Business and the New Issue Market for Equities.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (September 1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Tanner, J. Ernest, and Kochin, Levis A.. “The Determinants of the Difference between Bid and Ask Prices on Government Bonds.” Journal of Business (October 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]West, Richard. “New Issue Concessions on Municipal Bonds: A Case of Monopsony Pricing.” Journal of Business (April 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar