Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T14:47:51.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rates of Return to Stockholders of Acquired Companies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Extract

This study has addressed itself to that group most immediately affected in corporate acquisition, the stockholders of acquired companies. We find that in the years observed, acquired company stockholders seem to have benefited from the acquisitions. This study differs from other studies of post-merger performance of the common stock of acquirors and not the performance of securities received by acquirees in exchange for their common stock. It should also be noted that most of the financial gain resulting from the acquisitions accrued at the time of merger because of substantial premiums paid by acquirors. While the stockholders of the acquired companies have, on average, benefited, these results tell us little of the effect of mergers on the welfare of society or, for that matter, of their effect on the stockholders of the acquiring firm. If the merger cannot be justified on the basis of some economy of scale or synergistic advantage, the newcomers reap their lucrative returns only at the expense of the old guard. If the acquiring firm pays a premium in acquisition on the basis of justifiably sound expectations of increased profits, social welfare is not necessarily enhanced. Increased profitability may not reflect increased efficiency; it may, for example, be a manifestation of decay in the competitive environment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Alberts, William W. “The Profitability of Growth by Merger.” The Corporate Merger, eds., Alberts, William W. and Segall, Joel E.. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1966.Google Scholar
[2]Bock, Betty. Mergers and Markets: An Economic Analysis of the First Fifteen Years Under the Merger Act of 1950.Studies in Business Economics, No. 93, National Industrial Conference Board, 1966.Google Scholar
[3]Bock, Betty. Mergers and Markets: An Economic Analysis of Developments in 1967–1968 Under the Merger Act of 1950.Studies in Business Economics, No. 105, National Industrial Conference Board, 1969.Google Scholar
[4]Gort, Michael. “An Economic Disturbance Theory of Mergers.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, LXXXIII, November 1969, p. 624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Hogarty, Thomas F.The Profitability of Corporate Mergers.” The Journal of Business, Vol. 43, No. 3, July 1970, pp. 317327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Kelley, Eamon M.The Profitability of Growth Through Mergers. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
[7]Kemp, Bernard A.Understanding Merger Activity — Assessing the Structural Effects of Acquisitions. The Bulletin, No. 55–56. New York: New York University, 1969.Google Scholar
[8]Lorie, J. H., and Halpern, Paul. “Conglomerates: The Rhetoric and the Evidence.” Journal of Law and Economics, XIII, April 1970, p. 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Nelson, Ralph N.Merger Movements in American Industry, 1895–1956. National Bureau of Economic Research: Number 66, General Series. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
[10]Smith, Keith V., and Schreiner, John C.. “A Portfolio Analysis of Conglomerate Mergers.” The Journal of Finance, XXIV, June 1969, p. 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Staff Report to the Federal Trade Commission, Economic Report on Corporate Mergers. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office, 1969.Google Scholar