Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T07:35:05.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relative Prices of Dual Class Shares

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Brian F. Smith
Affiliation:
Mutual Group Financial Services Research Centre, School of Business and Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Ben Amoako-Adu
Affiliation:
Mutual Group Financial Services Research Centre, School of Business and Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

Empirical studies of dual class shares indicate that superior voting shares (SVS) sell at a premium relative to their counterpart restricted shares (RVS). This paper uses Toronto Stock Exchange data to show that SVS price premium over RVS reflects the expected takeover premium paid to shareholders outside the control block. Thus, marginal shareholders pay a higher SVS price in anticipation of receiving a differential takeover bid as suggested by the extra merger hypothesis. Further analysis indicates that voting power increases the price premium while ownership, size, and the higher trading liquidity of RVS are inversely related to the premium.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambrose, B., and Megginson, W. L.. “The Role of Asset Structure, Ownership Structure, and Takeover Defenses in Determining Acquisition Likelihood.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27 (12 1992), 575589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amihud, Y., and Mendelson, H.. “Liquidity and Asset Prices: Financial Management Implications.” Financial Management, 17 (Spring 1988), 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, W.Canada's Dual Class Shares: Further Evidence on the Market Value of Cash Dividends.” Journal of Finance, 43 (12 1988), 11431160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergstrom, C., and Rydqvist, K.. “Differentiated Bids for Voting and Restricted Voting Shares in Public Tender Offers.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 16 (02 1992), 97114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, M.; Desai, A.; and Kim, E. H.. “Synergistic Gains from Corporate Acquisitions and their Division between the Stockholders of Target and Acquiring Firms.” Journal of Financial Economics, 21 (05 1988), 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeAngelo, H., and DeAngelo, L.. “Managerial Ownership of Voting Rights: A Study of Public Corporations with Dual Classes of Common Stock.” Journal of Financial Economics, 14 (1985), 3369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, S. J., and Hart, O. D.. “One Share/One Vote and the Market for Corporate Control.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (01/03 1988), 175202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, C. T.Restricted Shares in Ontario.” Canadian Business Law Journal, 14 (1988), 258314.Google Scholar
Horner, M.The Value of the Corporate Voting Right.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 12 (03 1988), 6983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jog, V. M., and Riding, A. L., “Price Effects of Dual Class Shares.” Financial Analysts' Journal, 42 (01/02 1986), 5867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lease, R. C.; McConnell, J. J.; and Mikkelson, W. H.. “The Market Value of Control in Publicly Traded Corporations.” Journal of Financial Economics, 11 (1983), 439471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, H.Economic Evaluation of Voting Power of Common Stock.” Journal of Finance, 38 (03 1983), 7993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynes, E.Reallocation of Voting Rights and Shareholders' Wealth.” Canadian Journal of Economics, 25 (08 1992), 538563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Megginson, W. L.Restricted Voting Stock Acquisitions Premiums and the Market Value of Corporate Control.” Financial Review, 25 (05 1990), 175198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikkelson, W. H., and Partch, M. M.., “Managers' Voting Rights and Corporate Control.” Journal of Financial Economics, 25 (12 1989), 263290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ontario Securities Commission. “OSC Policy 1·3 Restricted Shares.” (12 1984).Google Scholar
Ontario Securities Commission. “Reasons for the Canadian Tire Decision.” (02 1987).Google Scholar
Palepu, K.Predicting Takeover Targets: A Methodological and Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 8 (03 1986), 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partch, M.The Creation of A Class of Limited Voting Common Stock and Shareholder Wealth.” Journal of Financial Economics, 18 (06 1987), 313339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, C., and White, A.. “Empirical Evidence on the Relative Valuation of Voting and Restricted Voting Shares.” Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 7 (12 1990), 918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruback, R. S.Coercive Dual-Class Exchange Offers.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (01/03 1988), 153173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydqvist, K. “Takeover Bids and the Relative Prices of Shares that Differ in Their Voting Rights.” Working Paper, Stockholm School of Economics (1991).Google Scholar
Seligman, J. “One Share, One Vote Controversy.” Corporate Governance Service, Investor Responsibility Research Centre, Inc. (01 1986).Google Scholar
Smith, B., and Amoako-Adu, B.. “Financing Canadian Corporations with Restricted Shares.” Monograph, National Centre for Management Research and Development. Univ. of Western Ontario, London, Ontario (02 1991).Google Scholar
Song, M. H., and Walkling, R. A., “The Impact of Managerial Ownership on Acquisition Attempts and Target Shareholder Wealth.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28 (12 1993), 439457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stulz, R.Managerial Control of Voting Rights: Financing Policies and the Market for Corporate Control.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (01/03 1988), 2554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toronto Stock Exchange. “Submission to the Ontario Securities Commission Concerning the Regulation of Non-Voting, Multiple Voting and Restricted Voting Common Shares.” (09 1981).Google Scholar
Venture Economics. Mergers and Acquisitions in Canada, various issues. Toronto: Canada Ltd.Google Scholar
Walkling, R. A.Predicting Tender Offer Success: A Logistic Analysis.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 20 (12 1985), 461478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, K. J.A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test of Het-eroskedasticity.” Econometrica, 48 (05 1980), 817838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar