Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T09:34:40.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to Comments of A. James Boness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Harold Bierman Jr.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A. James Boness is correct in stating that the orientation of my paper “Elements of a Theory of Stock-Option Value” is more oriented to valuation problems for executive stock options than to valuations arising in the New York put and call market. However, Boness, in his earlier article, stated that “its generality suggests that it is equally appropriate to an analysis of the values of stock warrants, convertible issues, and with modification, executive (non-negotiable) stock-options.” My article is an attempt to define one modification that is necessary.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , June 1968 , pp. 227 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bones, A. James, “Elements of a Theory of Stock-Option Value,” The Journal of Political Economy, April 1964, p. 163.Google Scholar