Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T14:42:25.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SEC Trading Suspensions: Empirical Evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Abstract

This article explores the price behavior of a sample of corporate securities in which trading was temporarily suspended by the SEC. Suspensions are found to coincide with substantial devaluations of the suspended securities. Further, significant and prolonged negative abnormal returns are observed in the postsuspension period, an apparent violation of semistrong form market efficiency.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Benston, G. J.Required Disclosure and the Stock Market: An Evaluation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.” American Economic Review, 63 (03 1973), 132155.Google Scholar
[2]Benston, G. J.Required Disclosure and the Stock Market: Rejoinder.” American Economic Review, 65 (06 1975), 473477.Google Scholar
[3]Benston, G. J., and Hagerman, R. L.. “Determinants of Bid-Ask Spreads in the Over-the-Counter Market.” Journal of Financial Economics, 1 (12 1974), 353364.Google Scholar
[4]Bloomenthal, H. S., and Wing, S. E.. Securities Law. New York: Clark Boardman Co., Ltd. (1973).Google Scholar
[5]Brown, S. J., and Warner, J. B.. “Measuring Security Price Performance.” Journal of Financial Economics, 8 (09 1980), 205258.Google Scholar
[6]Friend, I., and Herman, E. S.. “Professor Stigler on Securities Regulation: A Further Comment.” Journal of Business, 38 (01 1965), 106110.Google Scholar
[7]Friend, I., and Herman, E. S.The SEC through a Glass Darkly.” Journal of Business, 37 (10 1964), 382405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Friend, I., and Westerfield, R.. “Required Disclosure and the Stock Market: Comment.” American Economic Review, 65 (06 1975), 467472.Google Scholar
[9]Hopewell, M. H., and Schwartz, A. L. Jr, “Stock Price Movement Associated with Temporary Trading Suspensions: Bear Market versus Bull Market.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 11 (11 1976), 577590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Hopewell, M. H., and Schwartz, A. L. Jr, “Temporary Trading Suspensions in Individual NYSE Securities.” Journal of Finance, 33 (12 1978), 13551373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Jaffe, J. F.The Effect of Regulation Changes on Insider Trading.” Bell Journal of Economics, 5 (Spring 1974), 93121.Google Scholar
[12]Kryzanowski, L.The Efficacy of Trading Suspensions: A Regulatory Action Designed to Prevent the Exploitation of Monopoly Information.” Journal of Finance, 34 (12 1979), 11871200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Kryzanowski, L.Misinformation and Regulatory Actions in Canadian Capital Markets: Some Empirical Evidence.” Bell Journal of Economics, 9 (Autumn 1978), 355368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Loss, L.Securities Regulation. Vols. I–III. Boston: Little, Brown & Company (1961).Google Scholar
[15]Manne, H. G.Insider Trading and the Stock Market. New York: The Free Press (1966).Google Scholar
[16]Ratner, D. L.Securities Regulation. St. Paul: West Publ. Co. (1975).Google Scholar
[17]Robbins, S., and Werner, W.. “Professor Stigler Revisited.” Journal of Business, 37 (10 1964), 406413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Scholes, M., and Williams, J.. “Estimating Betas from Nonsynchronous Data.” Journal of Financial Economics, 5 (12 1975), 309328.Google Scholar
[19]Smidt, S.The Road to an Efficient Stock Market.” Financial Analysts Journal, 27 (09/10 1971), 1820, 64–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Stigler, G. J.Comment.” Journal of Business, 37 (10 1964), 414422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Stigler, G. J.Public Regulation of the Securities Markets.” Journal of Business, 37 (04 1964), 117142.Google Scholar