Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T05:23:53.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Share Repurchase as a Takeover Defense

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Abstract

This paper presents a model in which managers of firms that are takeover targets use debt-financed share repurchase to bond themselves to reduce perquisite consumption and increase investment in the firm. The resulting value increase makes the firm a less attractive target. The optimal level of share repurchase is the result of a trade-off between the benefit of a reduced probability of takeover and the cost of an increased probability of bankruptcy. Unlike earlier explanations of defensive repurchases, which are based on information signalling or control of voting rights, this explanation is independent of the extent of shareholding by target management.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bagnoli, M.; Gordon, R.; and Lipman, B. L.. “Stock Repurchase as Takeover Defense.” The Review of Financial Studies, 2 (No. 3, 1989), 423443.Google Scholar
Bagwell, L. S. “Share Repurchase and Takeover Deterrence.” Unpubl. paper, Dept. of Economics, Stanford Univ. (1988).Google Scholar
Dann, L.Common Stock Repurchases: An Analysis of Returns to Bondholders and Shareholders.” Journal of Financial Economics, 9 (06 1981), 113138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dann, L., and DeAngelo, H.. “Corporate Financial Policy and Corporate Control: A Study of Defensive Adjustments in Asset and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (01/03 1988), 87128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, S., and Hart, O.. “Corporate Financial Structure and Managerial Incentives.” In The Economics of Information under Uncertainty, McCall, J. J., ed. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press (1982), 107140.Google Scholar
Handa, P., and Radhakrishnan, A. R.. “An Empirical Investigation of Leveraged Recapitalizations: A New Takeover Defense Strategy.” Working Paper, Stern School of Management, New York Univ. (1989).Google Scholar
Harris, M., and Raviv, A.. “Corporate Control Contests and Capital Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (01/03 1988), 5586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinman, R. T.The Shareholder Gains from Leveraged Cash-Outs: Some Preliminary Evidence.” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, (Spring 1988), 4653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leland, H., and Pyle, D.. “Informational Asymmetries, Financial Structure, and Financial Intermediation.” Journal of Finance, 32 (05 1977), 371387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masulis, R. M.Stock Repurchase by Tender Offer: An Analysis of the Causes of Common Stock Price Changes.” Journal of Finance, 35 (05 1980), 305319.Google Scholar
Morck, R.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R. W.. “Management Ownership and Market Valuation.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (01/03 1988), 293315.Google Scholar
Ofer, A. R., and Thakor, A. V.. “A Theory of Stock Price Responses to Alternative Corporate Cash Disbursement Methods: Stock Repurchases and DividendsJournal of Finance, 42 (06 1987), 365394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stulz, R. M.Managerial Control of Voting Rights: Financing Policies and the Market for Corporate Contol.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (01/03 1988), 2554.Google Scholar
Vermaelen, T.Common Stock Repurchases and Market Signalling.” Journal of Financial Economics, 9 (06 1981), 139183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermaelen, T.Repurchase Tender Offers, Signalling, and Managerial Incentives.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 19 (06 1984), 163182.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E.Corporate Finance and Corporate Governance.” Journal of Finance, 43 (07 1988), 567591.Google Scholar