Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:03:30.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fundamentals concerning wave loading on offshore structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

James Lighthill
James Lighthill
Affiliation:
University College, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article is aimed at relating a certain substantial body of established material concerning wave loading on offshore structures to fundamental principles of mechanics of solids and of fluids and to important results by G. I. Taylor (1928a, b). The object is to make some key parts within a rather specialised field accessible to the general fluid-mechanics reader.

The article is concerned primarily to develop the ideas which validate a separation of hydrodynamic loadings into vortex-flow forces and potential-flow forces; and to clarify, as Taylor (1928b) first did, the major role played by components of the potential-flow forces which are of the second order in the amplitude of ambient velocity fluctuations. Recent methods for calculating these forces have proved increasingly important for modes of motion of structures (such as tension-leg platforms) of very low natural frequency.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 173 , December 1986 , pp. 667 - 681
Copyright
© 1986 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Drake, K. R., Eatock Taylor, R. & Matsui, T. 1984 Drift of an articulated cylinder in regular waves. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 394, 363–385.Google Scholar
Eatock Taylor, R. & Hung, S. M. 1985 Wave drift enhancement effects in multi-column structures. Appl. Ocean Res. 7, 128–139.Google Scholar
Eatock Taylor, R. & Hung, S. M. 1986 Second order diffraction forces on a vertical cylinder in regular waves. Appl. Ocean Res. (in press).Google Scholar
Eatock Taylor, R. & Sincock, P. 1986 Comparison of analyses for moored systems in random waves. Proc. Fifth Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engng Symp., vol. 1, pp. 264–272. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, USA.
Hogben, N., Miller, B. L., Searle, J. W. & Ward, G. 1977 Estimation of fluid loading on offshore structures. Natl Mar. Inst. Rep. no. 11.Google Scholar
Lighthill, J. 1963 Laminar Boundary Layers (ed. L. Rosenhead), chapters 1 and 2. Oxford University Press.
Lighthill, J. 1979 Waves and hydrodynamic loading. Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Behaviour of Off-Shore Structures, vol. 1, pp. 1–40. BHRA Fluid Engineering, Cranfield, Bedford, England.
Lighthill, J. 1986 An Informal Introduction to Theoretical Fluid Dynamics. Oxford University Press.
Matsui, T. 1986 Analysis of slowly varying wave drift forces on compliant structures. Proc. Fifth Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engng Symp., vol. 1, pp. 289–296. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, USA.
Mei, C. C. 1983 The Applied Dynamics of Ocean Surface Waves. Wiley.
Newman, J. N. 1975 Second order slowly varying forces on vessels in irregular waves. Proc. Int. Symp. Dynamics of Marine Vehicles and Structures in Waves, pp. 182–186. Institute of Mechanical Engineers, London.
Pinkster, J. A. 1979 Mean and low frequency wave drifting forces on floating structures. Ocean Engng 6, 593–615.Google Scholar
Standing, R. G. 1981 Wave loading on offshore structures. Natl Mar. Inst. Rep. no. R102.Google Scholar
Standing, R. G., Dacunha, N. M. C. & Matten, R. B. 1981 Slowly varying second order wave forces: theory and experiment. Natl Mar. Inst. Rep. no. R138.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1928a The energy of a body moving in an infinite fluid, with an application to airships. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 120, 13–21.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1928b The forces on a body placed in a curved or converging stream of fluid. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 120, 260–283.Google Scholar