Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T15:43:48.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A statistically stationary minimal flow unit for self-similar Rayleigh–Taylor turbulence in the mode-coupling limit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2025

Chian Yeh Goh Open the ORCID record for Chian Yeh Goh [Opens in a new window]  and
Guillaume Blanquart Open the ORCID record for Guillaume Blanquart [Opens in a new window]
Chian Yeh Goh*
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
Guillaume Blanquart
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: cgoh@caltech.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We propose a computational framework for simulating the self-similar regime of turbulent Rayleigh–Taylor (RT) mixing layers in a statistically stationary manner. By leveraging the anticipated self-similar behaviour of RT mixing layers, a transformation of the vertical coordinate and velocities is applied to the Navier–Stokes equations (NSE), yielding modified equations that resemble the original NSE but include two sets of additional terms. Solving these equations, a statistically stationary RT (SRT) flow is achieved. Unlike temporally growing Rayleigh–Taylor (TRT) flow, SRT flow is independent of initial conditions and can be simulated over infinite simulation time without escalating resolution requirements, hence guaranteeing statistical convergence. Direct numerical simulations (DNS) are performed at an Atwood number of 0.5 and unity Schmidt number. By varying the ratio of the mixing layer height to the domain width, a minimal flow unit of aspect ratio 1.5 is found to approximate TRT turbulence in the self-similar mode-coupling regime. The SRT minimal flow unit has one-sixteenth the number of grid points required by the equivalent TRT simulation of the same Reynolds number and grid resolution. The resultant flow corresponds to a theoretical limit where self-similarity is observed in all fields and across the entire spatial domain – a late-time state that existing experiments and DNS of TRT flow have difficulties attaining. Simulations of the SRT minimal flow unit span TRT-equivalent Reynolds numbers (based on mixing layer height) ranging from 500 to 10 800. The SRT results are validated against TRT data from this study as well as from Cabot & Cook (Nat. Phys., vol. 2, 2006, pp. 562–568).

JFM classification

Convection: Buoyancy-driven instability Turbulent Flows: Turbulence simulation Mixing: Turbulent mixing
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 1002 , 10 January 2025 , A19
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abarzhi, S.I. 2010 Review of theoretical modelling approaches of Rayleigh–Taylor instabilities and turbulent mixing. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 368 (1916), 1809–1828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews, M.J. & Dalziel, S.B. 2010 Small Atwood number Rayleigh–Taylor experiments. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 368 (1916), 1663–1679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anselmet, F., Gagne, Y., Hopfinger, E.J. & Antonia, R.A. 1984 High-order velocity structure functions in turbulent shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 140, 63–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, A. 2020 Rayleigh–Taylor instability: a status review of experimental designs and measurement diagnostics. J. Fluids Engng 142 (12), 120801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, A. & Andrews, M.J. 2006 Statistically steady measurements of Rayleigh–Taylor mixing in a gas channel. Phys. Fluids 18 (3), 035107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, A. & Andrews, M.J. 2009 3D simulations to investigate initial condition effects on the growth of Rayleigh–Taylor mixing. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 52 (17-18), 3906–3917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, A., Gore, R.A. & Andrews, M.J. 2010 a Development and validation of a turbulent-mix model for variable-density and compressible flows. Phys. Rev. E 82 (4), 046309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banerjee, A., Kraft, W.N. & Andrews, M.J. 2010 b Detailed measurements of a statistically steady Rayleigh–Taylor mixing layer from small to high Atwood numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 659, 127–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benzi, R., Ciliberto, S., Tripiccione, R., Baudet, C., Massaioli, F. & Succi, S. 1993 Extended self-similarity in turbulent flows. Phys. Rev. E 48, R29–R32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boffetta, G., De Lillo, F. & Musacchio, S. 2012 a Anomalous diffusion in confined turbulent convection. Phys. Rev. E 85, 066322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boffetta, G., De Lillo, F., Mazzino, A. & Musacchio, S. 2012 b Bolgiano scale in confined Rayleigh–Taylor turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 690, 426–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boffetta, G. & Mazzino, A. 2017 Incompressible Rayleigh–Taylor turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 49, 119–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boffetta, G., Mazzino, A., Musacchio, S. & Vozella, L. 2009 Kolmogorov scaling and intermittency in Rayleigh–Taylor turbulence. Phys. Rev. E 79 (6), 065301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burton, G.C. 2011 Study of ultrahigh Atwood-number Rayleigh–Taylor mixing dynamics using the nonlinear large-eddy simulation method. Phys. Fluids 23 (4), 045106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabot, W.H. & Cook, A.W. 2006 Reynolds number effects on Rayleigh–Taylor instability with possible implications for type-Ia supernovae. Nat. Phys. 2, 562–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabot, W.H. & Zhou, Y. 2013 Statistical measurements of scaling and anisotropy of turbulent flows induced by Rayleigh–Taylor instability. Phys. Fluids 25 (1), 015107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, P.L. & Blanquart, G. 2015 A new framework for simulating forced homogeneous buoyant turbulent flows. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 29 (3), 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S. 1955 The character of the equilibrium of an incompressible heavy viscous fluid of variable density. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 51 (1), 162–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chertkov, M. 2003 Phenomenology of Rayleigh–Taylor turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (11), 115001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chung, D. & Pullin, D.I. 2010 Direct numerical simulation and large-eddy simulation of stationary buoyancy-driven turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 643, 279–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, A.W., Cabot, W.H. & Miller, P.L. 2004 The mixing transition in Rayleigh–Taylor instability. J. Fluid Mech. 511, 333–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalziel, S.B., Patterson, M.D., Caulfield, C.P. & Coomaraswamy, I.A. 2008 Mixing efficiency in high-aspect-ratio Rayleigh–Taylor experiments. Phys. Fluids 20 (6), 065106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desjardins, O., Blanquart, G., Balarac, G. & Pitsch, H. 2008 High order conservative finite difference scheme for variable density low Mach number turbulent flows. J. Comput. Phys. 227 (15), 7125–7159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhandapani, C. & Blanquart, G. 2020 From isotropic turbulence in triply periodic cubic domains to sheared turbulence with inflow/outflow. Phys. Rev. Fluids 5 (12), 124605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimonte, G. & Tipton, R. 2006 K-L turbulence model for the self-similar growth of the Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities. Phys. Fluids 18 (8), 085101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimonte, G., et al. 2004 A comparative study of the turbulent Rayleigh–Taylor instability using high-resolution three-dimensional numerical simulations: the Alpha-Group collaboration. Phys. Fluids 16 (5), 1668–1693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R.E., Harlow, F.H. & Hirt, C.W. 1962 Effects of diffusion on interface instability between gases. Phys. Fluids 5 (4), 417–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, J.M., Kim, J. & Waleffe, F. 1995 Regeneration mechanisms of near-wall turbulence structures. J. Fluid Mech. 287, 317–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, A. & Biringen, S. 2016 The minimal flow unit in complex turbulent flows. Phys. Fluids 28 (12), 125102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez, J. & Moin, P. 1991 The minimal flow unit in near-wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 225, 213–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livescu, D. & Ristorcelli, J.R. 2007 Buoyancy-driven variable-density turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 591, 43–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livescu, D., Ristorcelli, J.R., Gore, R.A., Dean, S.H., Cabot, W.H. & Cook, A.W. 2009 High-Reynolds number Rayleigh–Taylor turbulence. J. Turbul. 10, N13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livescu, D., Wei, T. & Petersen, M.R. 2011 Direct numerical simulations of Rayleigh–Taylor instability. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 318, 082007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, T., Wang, Y., Yuan, Z., Jiang, Z., Huang, W. & Wang, J. 2023 Large-eddy simulations of compressible Rayleigh–Taylor turbulence with miscible fluids using spatial gradient model. Phys. Fluids 35 (10), 105131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellado, J.P., Sarkar, S. & Zhou, Y. 2005 Large-eddy simulation of Rayleigh–Taylor turbulence with compressible miscible fluids. Phys. Fluids 17 (7), 076101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meneveau, C. & Sreenivasan, K.R. 1987 The multifractal spectrum of the dissipation field in turbulent flows. Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 2, 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikhaeil, M., Suchandra, P., Ranjan, D. & Pathikonda, G. 2021 Simultaneous velocity and density measurements of fully developed Rayleigh–Taylor mixing. Phys. Rev. Fluids 6 (7), 073902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, B.E., Olson, B.J., White, J.E. & McFarland, J.A. 2017 Self-similarity of a Rayleigh–Taylor mixing layer at low Atwood number with a multimode initial perturbation. J. Turbul. 18 (10), 973–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, B.E. & Wickett, M.E. 2015 Three-equation model for the self-similar growth of Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meskov instabilities. Phys. Rev. E 91 (4), 043002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mueschke, N.J., Andrews, M.J. & Schilling, O. 2006 Experimental characterization of initial conditions and spatio-temporal evolution of a small-Atwood-number Rayleigh–Taylor mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 567, 27–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueschke, N.J. & Schilling, O. 2009 a Investigation of Rayleigh–Taylor turbulence and mixing using direct numerical simulation with experimentally measured initial conditions. I. Comparison to experimental data. Phys. Fluids 21 (1), 014106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueschke, N.J. & Schilling, O. 2009 b Investigation of Rayleigh–Taylor turbulence and mixing using direct numerical simulation with experimentally measured initial conditions. II. Dynamics of transitional flow and mixing statistics. Phys. Fluids 21 (1), 014107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueschke, N.J., Schilling, O., Youngs, D.L. & Andrews, M.J. 2009 Measurements of molecular mixing in a high-Schmidt-number Rayleigh–Taylor mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 632, 17–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rah, K.J. & Blanquart, G. 2019 Numerical forcing scheme to generate passive scalar mixing on the centerline of turbulent round jets in a triply periodic box. Phys. Rev. Fluids 4 (12), 124504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramaprabhu, P. & Andrews, M.J. 2004 a Experimental investigation of Rayleigh–Taylor mixing at small Atwood numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 502, 233–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramaprabhu, P. & Andrews, M.J. 2004 b On the initialization of Rayleigh–Taylor simulations. Phys. Fluids 16 (8), L59–L62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramaprabhu, P., Dimonte, G. & Andrews, M.J. 2005 A numerical study of the influence of initial perturbations on the turbulent Rayleigh–Taylor instability. J. Fluid Mech. 536, 285–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayleigh, L. 1882 Investigation of the character of the equilibrium of an incompressible heavy fluid of variable density. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. s1-14 (1), 170–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ristorcelli, J.R. & Clark, T.T. 2004 Rayleigh–Taylor turbulence: self-similar analysis and direct numerical simulations. J. Fluid Mech. 507, 213–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosales, C. & Meneveau, C. 2005 Linear forcing in numerical simulations of isotropic turbulence: physical space implementations and convergence properties. Phys. Fluids 17 (9), 095106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruan, J. & Blanquart, G. 2021 Direct numerical simulations of a statistically stationary streamwise periodic boundary layer via the homogenized Navier–Stokes equations. Phys. Rev. Fluids 6 (2), 024602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilling, O. 2020 Progress on understanding Rayleigh–Taylor flow and mixing using synergy between simulation, modeling, and experiment. J. Fluids Engng 142 (12), 120802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilling, O. 2021 Self-similar Reynolds-averaged mechanical–scalar turbulence models for Rayleigh–Taylor, Richtmyer–Meshkov, and Kelvin–Helmholtz instability-induced mixing in the small Atwood number limit. Phys. Fluids 33 (8), 085129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilling, O. & Mueschke, N.J. 2010 Analysis of turbulent transport and mixing in transitional Rayleigh–Taylor unstable flow using direct numerical simulation data. Phys. Fluids 22 (10), 105102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilling, O. & Mueschke, N.J. 2017 Turbulent transport and mixing in transitional Rayleigh–Taylor unstable flow: A priori assessment of gradient-diffusion and similarity modeling. Phys. Rev. E 96 (6), 063111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G.I. 1950 The instability of liquid surfaces when accelerated in a direction perpendicular to their planes. I. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 201 (1065), 192–196.Google Scholar
Verma, S., Xuan, Y. & Blanquart, G. 2014 An improved bounded semi-Lagrangian scheme for the turbulent transport of passive scalars. J. Comput. Phys. 272, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vladimirova, N. & Chertkov, M. 2009 Self-similarity and universality in Rayleigh–Taylor, Boussinesq turbulence. Phys. Fluids 21 (1), 015102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, I. 2020 Analysis of Rayleigh–Taylor instability at high Atwood numbers using fully implicit, non-dissipative, energy-conserving large eddy simulation algorithm. Phys. Fluids 32 (5), 054101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youngs, D.L. 1984 Numerical simulation of turbulent mixing by Rayleigh–Taylor instability. Physica D 12 (1–3), 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youngs, D.L. 2013 The density ratio dependence of self-similar Rayleigh–Taylor mixing. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 371 (2003), 20120173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Y., Ruan, Y., Xie, H. & Tian, B. 2020 Mixed mass of classical Rayleigh–Taylor mixing at arbitrary density ratios. Phys. Fluids 32 (1), 011702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y. 2017 a Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instability induced flow, turbulence, and mixing. I. Phys. Rep. 720–722, 1–136.Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. 2017 b Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instability induced flow, turbulence, and mixing. II. Phys. Rep. 723–725, 1–160.Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. & Cabot, W.H. 2019 Time-dependent study of anisotropy in Rayleigh–Taylor instability induced turbulent flows with a variety of density ratios. Phys. Fluids 31 (8), 084106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., Cabot, W.H. & Thornber, B. 2016 Asymptotic behavior of the mixed mass in Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instability induced flows. Phys. Plasmas 23 (5), 052712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Goh and Blanquart supplementary movie

Evolution of the heavy fluid mole fraction in SRT-1.5(G5). Only values between 0.01 and 0.99 are visualized. Flow is initialized at $s = 0$ with an SRT flow field of a smaller Grashof number and evolves to a larger Grashof number behavior by $s ≈ τ0$. For $s > τ0$, the flow appears stationary, ergodic, and qualitatively similar to TRT flow.
Download Goh and Blanquart supplementary movie(File)
File 10.2 MB