Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:54:38.736Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Theoretical impulse threshold for particle dislodgement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2019

Sergio Maldonado*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
Gustavo A. M. de Almeida
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
*
Email address for correspondence: s.maldonado@soton.ac.uk

Abstract

The problem of determining the threshold of motion of a sediment particle resting on the bed of an open channel has historically been dominated by an approach based on the time–space-averaged bed shear stress (i.e. Shields criterion). Recently, experimental studies have promoted an alternative approach to predict the dislodgement threshold, which is based on the impulse of the flow-induced force. Nonetheless, theoretical analyses accompanying these studies result in complex expressions that fail to provide a direct estimate of said impulse threshold. We employ the work–energy principle to derive a prediction of the fundamental impulse threshold that the destabilising hydrodynamic force must overcome in order to achieve full particle dislodgement. For the bed configuration studied, which is composed of spheres, the proposed expression depends on the mobile particle’s size and mass, and shows excellent agreement with experimental observations previously published. The derivation presented in this paper may thus represent a robust theoretical framework that aids in the reinterpretation of existing data, as well as in the design of future experiments aimed at analysing the importance of hydrodynamic impulse as a criterion for prediction of particle dislodgement.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© 2019 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barati, R., Neyshabouri, S. A. A. S. & Ahmadi, G. 2018 Issues in Eulerian–Lagrangian modeling of sediment transport under saltation regime. Intl J. Sedim. Res. 33 (4), 441461.10.1016/j.ijsrc.2018.04.003Google Scholar
Buffington, J. M. & Montgomery, D. R. 1997 A systematic analysis of eight decades of incipient motion studies, with special reference to gravel-bedded rivers. Water Resour. Res. 33 (8), 19932029.10.1029/96WR03190Google Scholar
Celik, A. O., Diplas, P. & Dancey, C. L. 2013 Instantaneous turbulent forces and impulse on a rough bed: implications for initiation of bed material movement. Water Resour. Res. 49 (4), 22132227.10.1002/wrcr.20210Google Scholar
Celik, A. O., Diplas, P., Dancey, C. L. & Valyrakis, M. 2010 Impulse and particle dislodgement under turbulent flow conditions. Phys. Fluids 22 (4), 046601.10.1063/1.3385433Google Scholar
Diplas, P., Dancey, C. L., Celik, A. O., Valyrakis, M., Greer, K. & Akar, T. 2008 The role of impulse on the initiation of particle movement under turbulent flow conditions. Science 322 (5902), 717720.10.1126/science.1158954Google Scholar
Fenton, J. D. & Abbott, J. E. 1977 Initial movement of grains on a stream bed: the effect of relative protrusion. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 352 (1671), 523537.10.1098/rspa.1977.0014Google Scholar
Heathershaw, A. D. & Thorne, P. D. 1985 Sea-bed noises reveal role of turbulent bursting phenomenon in sediment transport by tidal currents. Nature 316 (6026), 339342.10.1038/316339a0Google Scholar
Kudrolli, A., Scheff, D. & Allen, B. 2016 Critical shear rate and torque stability condition for a particle resting on a surface in a fluid flow. J. Fluid Mech. 808, 397409.10.1017/jfm.2016.655Google Scholar
Nelson, J. M., Shreve, R. L., McLean, S. R. & Drake, T. G. 1995 Role of near-bed turbulence structure in bed load transport and bed form mechanics. Water Resour. Res. 31 (8), 20712086.10.1029/95WR00976Google Scholar
Pantaleone, J. & Messer, J. 2011 The added mass of a spherical projectile. Am. J. Phys. 79 (12), 12021210.10.1119/1.3644334Google Scholar
Schmeeckle, M. W., Nelson, J. M. & Shreve, R. L. 2007 Forces on stationary particles in near-bed turbulent flows. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 112 (F2), F02003.Google Scholar
Sumer, B. M., Chua, L. H., Cheng, N.-S. & Fredsøe, J. 2003 Influence of turbulence on bed load sediment transport. J. Hydraul. Engng 129 (8), 585596.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2003)129:8(585)Google Scholar
Valyrakis, M., Diplas, P. & Dancey, C. L. 2013 Entrainment of coarse particles in turbulent flows: an energy approach. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 118 (1), 4253.10.1029/2012JF002354Google Scholar
Valyrakis, M., Diplas, P., Dancey, C. L., Greer, K. & Celik, A. O. 2010 Role of instantaneous force magnitude and duration on particle entrainment. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 115 (F2), F02006.Google Scholar