Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:33:34.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An ‘entraining plume’ model of a spilling breaker

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

M. S. Longuet-Higgins  and
J. S. Turner
M. S. Longuet-Higgins
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge
J. S. Turner
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is proposed that a spilling breaker can be regarded as a turbulent gravity current riding down the forward slope of a wave, and can be treated using methods which have been successful in other contexts. The whitecap retains its identity because it is lighter than the water below, owing to the trapping of air bubbles, and information from laboratory experiments is used to estimate the density of the air-water mixture in different circumstances. Entrainment of water from below, at a rate E(Ri0,) which is a function of the overall Richardson number Ri0, has two opposing effects. It provides increasing mass and buoyancy fluxes which can produce an accelerating flow and it also gives rise to a drag, because the entrained fluid has upslope momentum (inco-ordinates moving with the wave crest).

A similarity solution is obtained under the assumptions that the flow is steady in time, and that the slope and the density difference remain constant. In this solution, the thickness of the whitecap is proportional to the distances measured from the crest of the wave. The tangential velocity is proportional to s½. Since the velocity in a Stokes 120° angle is also proportional to s½ this implies that such a flow can start from a small disturbance with zero flux, and propagate with constant acceleration. An important consequence of the analysis is that solutions of this kind are possible only when the slope and the density difference between the whitecap and the water below are sufficiently large; otherwise the upward drag dominates, and a self-sustaining flow cannot form. For a slope of 30°, near the crest of the breaking wave, the theory predicts that a density difference greater than 8% is required to sustain a steady motion, at which point the downslope velocity is 12% of the opposing velocity at the wave surface. A 'starting plume’ model of the advancing front of the breaker is also discussed, which suggests that this too will be accelerating uniformly, but will have a velocity somewhat less than that in the flow behind.

A comparison with the laboratory observations of Kjeldsen & Olsen verifies several features of the model, including the order of magnitude of the relative velocities in the whitecaps and the wave beneath. It also reveals the intermittent nature of the flow, which is here explained as due to the intermittent rounding of the wave crest due to damping of the wave by the whitecap on the forward face.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 63 , Issue 1 , 18 March 1974 , pp. 1 - 20
Copyright
© 1974 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chan, R.K.C. & Street, R.L. 1970 Shoaling of finit amplitude waves on plane beaches. Proc. 12th Conf. on Coastal Engng, pp. 345–362. New York: A.S.C.E.
T. H., Ellison & Turner, J. S. 1959 Turbulent entrainment in stratified flows. J. Fluid Mech. 6, 423–48.Google Scholar
Galvin, C. J. 1972 Wave breaking in shallow water. In Waves on Beaches (ed. R. E. Meyer), pp. 413–456. Academic.
Gangadharaiah, T., Lakshmana RAO, N. S. & Seetharamiah, K. 1970 Inception and entrainment in self-aerated flows. J. Hyd. Div. A.S.C.E. HY 7, 1549–1565.Google Scholar
Ippen, A. T. & Kulin, G. 1955 Shoaling and breaking characteristics of the solitary wave. M.I.T. Hydrodynamics Lab. Tech. Rep. no. 15.Google Scholar
Kjeldsen, S. P. & Olsen, G. B. 1971 Breaking waves (16 mm film). Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen.
Lakshmana RAO, N. S., Seetharamiah, K. & Gangadharaiah, T. 1970 Characteristics of self-aerated flows. J. Hyd. Div. A.S.C.E. HY 2, 331–355.Google Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1973a A model of flow separation at a free surface. J. Fluid Mech. 57, 129–148.Google Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1973b The sea surface. Review lecture to Royal Society of London, 5 April 1973.
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1974 On the mass, momentum, energy and circulation of a solitary wave. Proc. Roy. Soc. A. In the Press.Google Scholar
Mason, M. A. 1952 Some observations of breaking waves. In Gravity Waves, pp. 215–220. U.S. Nat. Bur. Standards. Circular no. 521.
Rajaratnan, N. 1962 An experimental study of the air entrainment characteristics of hydraulic jump. J. Inst. Engng India, 42, 247–273.Google Scholar
Rajaratnam, N. 1967 Hydraulic jumps. Advances in Hydroscience, vol. 4, pp. 197–280. Academic.
Stokes, G. G. 1880 On the theory of oscillatory waves. Math. & Phys. Papers, 1, 197–229, 314. Cambridge University Press.
Straub, L. G. & Anderson, A. G. 1958 Experiments on self-aerated flow in open channels. J. Hyd. Div. A.S.C.E. 7, 1–35.Google Scholar
Straub, L. G. & Lamb, O. P. 1956 Studies of air entrainment in open-channel flows. Trans. A.S.C.E. 121, 30–44.Google Scholar
Tsang, G. 1970 Laboratory study of two-dimensional starting plumes. Atmos. Envir. 4, 519–544.Google Scholar
Turner, J. S. 1960 A comparison between buoyant vortex rings and vortex pairs. J. Fluid Mech. 7, 419–432.Google Scholar
Turner, J. S. 1962 The starting plume in neutral surroundings. J. Fluid Mech. 13, 356–368.Google Scholar