Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:19:48.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Asymptotic analysis of the radiation by volume sources in supersonic rotor acoustics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

H. Ardavan
H. Ardavan
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OHA, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The application of Lighthill's acoustic analogy to the generation of sound by rotating surfaces with supersonic speeds results in radiation integrals in which the stationary points of the phase function – that describes the sapce-time distance between each source point and a fixed observation point – have variable positions and coalesce at a caustic in the space of source points. Here, the leading term in the asymptotic expansion of the corresponding Green's function at this caustic is calculated, both in the time and the frequency domains, and it is shown that the radiation generated by volume sources, which are steady in the uniformly rotating blade-fixed frame, has an amplitude that does not obey the spherical spreading law, i.e. does not fall off like RP–1 with the radial distance RP away from the source. Within a finite solid angle, depending on the extent of the source distribution, the amplitude of this newly identified sound decays like RP–½, so that it is stronger in the far field than any previously studied element. That this is not incompatible with the conservation of energy is because the emission time intervals associated with the volume elements of the source distribution which contribute towards the non-spherically decaying component of the radiation are by a large (RP-dependent) factor greater than the time intervals during which the signals generated by these elements are received. The contributing source elements are those whose positions at the retarded time coincide witht the locus of singularities of the Green's function, i.e. with the one-dimensional locus of points, fixed in the rotating frame, which approach the observer with the wave speed and zero acceleration along the radiation direction. Because the signals received at two neighbouring instants in time arise from distinct, coherently radiating filamentary parts of the source which have both different extents and different strengths, the resulting overall waveform in the far zone consists of the superposition of a (continuous) set of narrow subpulses with uneven amplitudes. These subpulses are narrower the larger the distance from the source.

The differences between the new results and those of the earlier works in the literature are shown to arise from the error terms in the far-field and high-frequency approximations, approximations that are inappropriate for volume sources moving supersonically.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 266 , 10 May 1994 , pp. 33 - 68
Copyright
© 1994 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. A. 1970 Handbook of Mathematical Function. Dover.
Ardavan, H. 1981 Is the light cylinder the site of emission in pulsars? Nature 287, 44–45.Google Scholar
Ardavan, H. 1984 A speed-of-light barrier in classical electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. D 29, 207–215.Google Scholar
Ardavan, H. 1989 The speed-of-light catastrophe. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 424, 113–141.Google Scholar
Ardavan, H. 1991a The breakdown of the linearized theory and the role of quadrupole sources in transonic rotor acoustics. J. Fluid Mech. 226, 591–624.Google Scholar
Ardavan, H. 1991b The near-field singularity predicted by the spiral Green's function in acoustics and electrodynamics. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 433, 451–459.Google Scholar
Bleistein, N. & Handelsman, R. A. 1986 Asymptotic Expansions of Integral. Dover.
Bryan, G. H. 1920 The acoustics of moving sources with applications to airscrews. Rep. Mem. Aero. Res. Comm., Lond. 648.Google Scholar
Chester, C., Friedman, B. & Ursell, F. 1957 An extension of the method of steepest descents. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 54, 599–611.Google Scholar
Costa, A. A. da & Kahn, F. D. 1985 Pulsar electrodynamics: the back reaction of the motion of charged particles. Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 215, 701–711.Google Scholar
Courant, R. & Hilbert, D. 1962 Methods of Mathematical Physics, vol. 2. Interscience.Google Scholar
Crighton, D. G. & Parry, A. B. 1991 Asymptotic theory of propeller noise – Part II: Supersonic single-rotation propeller. AIAA J. 29, 2031–2037.Google Scholar
Dowling, A. P. & Ffowcs Williams, J. E. 1983 Sound and Sources of Soun. Ellis Horwood Ltd.
Farassat, F. 1981 Linear acoustic formulas for calculation of rotating blade noise. AIAA J. 19, 1122–1130.Google Scholar
Farassat, F. & Myers, M. K. 1989 An analysis of the quadrupole noise source of high speed rotating blades. Presented at 2nd IMACS Symp. on Computational Acoustics. Princeton University.
Ffowcs Williams, J. E. 1965 On the development of Mach waves radiated by small disturbances. J. Fluid Mech. 22, 49–55.Google Scholar
Ffowcs Williams, J. E. 1993a Computing the sources of sound. In Computational Acoustic. vol. I (ed. R. L. Lau, D. Lee & A. R. Robinson). Elsevier.
Ffowcs Williams, J. E. 1993b Supersonic sources make focused waves. In Symposium on Aerodynamics and Aeroacoustic. (ed. K.-Y. Fung). World Scientific. (In press).
Ffowcs Williams, J. E. & Guo, Y. P. 1988 Sound generated from the interruption of a steady flow by a supersonically moving aerofoil. J. Fluid Mech. 195, 113–135.Google Scholar
Ffowcs Williams, J. E. & Hawkings, D. L. 1969 Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 264, 321–342.Google Scholar
Friedlander, F. G. 1958 Sound Pulse. Cambridge University Press.
Guo, Y. P. 1990 Sound generation by a supersonic aerofoil cutting through a steady jet flow. J. Fluid Mech. 216, 193–212.Google Scholar
Hanson, D. B. 1980 Helicoidal surface theory for harmonic noise of propellers in the far field. AIAA J. 18, 1213–1220.Google Scholar
Hanson, D. B. 1983 Compressible helicoidal surface theory for propeller aerodynamics and noise. AIAA J. 21, 881–889.Google Scholar
Hanson, D. B. & Fink, M. R. 1979 The importance of quadrupole sources in prediction of transonic tip speed propeller noise. J. Sound Vib. 62, 19–38.Google Scholar
Hawkings, D. L. & Lowson, M. V. 1974 Theory of open supersonic rotor noise. J. Sound Vib. 36, 1–20.Google Scholar
Hilton, W. F. 1939 The photography of airscrew sound waves. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 169, 174–190.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1993 Some aspects of the aeroacoustics of extreme-speed jets. In Symposium on Aerodynamics and Aeroacoustic. (ed. K.-Y. Fung). World Scientific. (In press).
Lilley, G. M., Westley, R., Yates, A. H. & Busing, J. R. 1953 Some aspects of noise from supersonic aircraft. J. R. Aero. Soc. 57, 396–414.Google Scholar
Ludwig, D. 1966 Uniform asymptotic expansions at a caustic. Commun. Pure Appl. Maths 19, 215–250.Google Scholar
Myers, J., Shen, H.-M., Wu, T. T. & Brandt, H. 1990 Fun with pulses. Phys. World 3, (11), 39–42.Google Scholar
Myers, M. K. & Farassat, F. 1987 Structure and propagation of supersonic singularities from helicoidal sources. AIAA Paper 87-267.
Parry, A. B. & Crighton, D. G. 1989 Asymptotic theory of propeller noise – Part I: Subsonic single-rotation propeller. AIAA J. 27, 1184–1190.Google Scholar
Peake, N. & Crighton, D. G. 1991a Lighthill quadrupole radiation in supersonic propeller acoustics. J. Fluid Mech. 223, 363–382.Google Scholar
Peake, N. & Crighton, D. G. 1991b An asymptotic theory of near-field propeller acoustics. J. Fluid Mech. 232, 285–301.Google Scholar
Tam, C. K. W. 1983 On linear acoustic solutions of high speed helicopter impulsive noise problems. J. Sound Vib. 89, 119–134.Google Scholar
Tam, C. K. W., Salikuddin, M. & Hanson, D. B. 1988 Acoustic interference of counter-rotation propellers. J. Sound Vib. 14, 357–366.Google Scholar
Whitham, G. B. 1974 Linear and Nonlinear Wave. Wiley.
Ziolkowski, R. W. 1989 Localized transmission of electromagnetic energy. Phys. Rev. A 44, 3960–3984.Google Scholar