Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:42:57.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biofluiddynamics of balistiform and gymnotiform locomotion. Part 4. Short-wavelength limitations on momentum enhancement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

James Lighthill
James Lighthill
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University College, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Elongated-body theory, used by Lighthill & Blake (1990) to investigate fish locomotion by undulatory movements of median fins, and to demonstrate momentum enhancement in the case when motile fins are attached to a rigid fish body of far greater depth, approximates local fluid motions by solutions of the two-dimensional Laplace equation. Here, a better local approximation (equation (2) below) to the three-dimensional Laplace equation for fluid motions of undulatory type is used to investigate the possibility of short-wavelength limitations on momentum enhancement. In an extreme case (fish bodies of very small width and very large depth) when on elongated-body theory the momentum enhancement factor β is predicted to become very large, short-wavelength considerations are shown to place a specific upper limit on β (see figure 2). In more general cases, this upper limit should perhaps be regarded as coexisting with other upper limits associated with either nonzero width or finite depth of fish body.

Short-wavelength limitations on momentum enhancement are of some biological interest as implying the existence not only of advantages (including a reduction in body drag) but also of some competing disadvantages (limitations in propulsive force) arising from progressive reductions in the wavelength of fin undulations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 213 , April 1990 , pp. 21 - 28
Copyright
© 1990 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lamb, H. 1906 On Sommerfeld's diffraction problem, and on reflection by a parabolic mirror. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 4, 190.Google Scholar
Lamb, H. 1932 Hydrodynamics. Cambridge University Press.
Lighthill, J. 1990 Biofluiddynamics of balistiform and gymnotiform locomotion. Part 3. Momentum enhancement in the presence of a body of elliptic cross-section J. Fluid Mech. 213, 11–20 (referred to as Part 3).Google Scholar
Lighthill, J. & Blake, R. 1990 Biofluiddynamics of balistiform and gymnotiform motion. Part 1. Biological background, and analysis by elongated-body theory. J. Fluid Mech. 212, 183–207 (referred to as Part 1).Google Scholar
Sommerfeld, A. 1895 Mathematische Theorie der Diffraktion. Math. Annalen 47, 317.Google Scholar