Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:20:38.757Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Boundary-layer analysis of the thermal bar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Anthony Kay ,
H. K. Kuiken  and
J. H. Merkin
Anthony Kay
Affiliation:
Loughborough University of Technology, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK
H. K. Kuiken
Affiliation:
University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
J. H. Merkin
Affiliation:
University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The thermal bar, a descending plane plume of fluid at the temperature of maximum density (3.98° C in water), is analysed as a laminar free-convection boundary layer, following the example of Kuiken & Rotem (1971) for the plume above a line source of heat. Numerical integration of the similarity form of the boundary-layer equations yields values of the vertical velocity and temperature gradient on the centre line and the horizontal velocity induced outside the thermal bar as functions of Prandtl number σ. The asymptotic behaviour of these parameters for both large and small σ is also obtained; in these cases, the thermal bar has a two-layer structure, and the method of matched asymptotic expansions is used. For the intermediate case σ= 1, an analytical calculation using approximate velocity and temperature profiles in the integrated boundary-layer equations yields good agreement with the numerical results. The applicability of the results to naturally occurring thermal bars (e. g. in lakes) is limited, but the laminar-flow analysis is likely to relate more closely to the phenomenon on a laboratory scale.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 303 , 25 November 1995 , pp. 253 - 278
Copyright
© 1995 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brooks, I. & Lick, W. 1972 Lake currents associated with the thermal bar. J. Geophys. Res. 77, 6000–6013.Google Scholar
Carmack, E. C. 1979 Combined influence of inflow and lake temperatures on Spring circulation in a riverine lake. J. Phys. Oceangor. 9, 422–434.Google Scholar
Cormack, D. E., Leal, L. G. & Imberger, J. 1974 Natural convection in a shallow cavity with differentially heated end walls. Part 1. Asymptoic theory. J. Fluid. Mech. 65, 209–229.Google Scholar
Elloit, G. H. 1971 A mathematical study of the thermal bar. In Proc. 14th Conf. Great Lakes Res., pp. 545–554. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Intl Assoc. Great Lakes Res.
Farrow, D. E. 1995a An asymptotic model for the hydrodynamics of the thermal bar. J. Fluid. Mech. 289, 129–140.Google Scholar
Farrow, D. E. 1995b A numerical model of the hydrodynamics of thermal bar. J. Fluid Mech. 303, 279–295.Google Scholar
Forel, F. A. 1880 La congélatin des lacs suisses et Savoyards pendant l'hiver 1879–1880. 11. Lac. Léman. L'Écho des Alpes. 3, 149–161.Google Scholar
Garrett, C. & Horne, E. 1978 Frontal circulation due to cabbeling and double diffusion. J. Geophys. Res. 83, 4651–4656.Google Scholar
Gebhart, B., Jaluria, Y., Mahajan, R. L. & Sammakla, B. 1988 Bouyancy-Induced Flows and Transport. Hemisphere.
Gebhart, B. & Mollendorf, J. C. 1977 A. new density relation for pure and saline water. Deep-Sea Res. 24, 831–848.Google Scholar
Gebhart, B. & Mollendorf, J. C. 1978 Buoyancy induced flows in water under conditions in which density extrema may arise. J. Fluid. Mech. 89, 673–707.Google Scholar
Hung, J. C. K. 1972 The thermal bar. Geophys. Fluid. Dyn. 3, 1–25.Google Scholar
Hubbard, D. W. & Spain J. D. 1973 The structure of the early Spring thermal bar in Lake Superior. In Proc. 16 th Conf. Great Lakes Res., Ann Arbor, Michigan: Intl Assoc. Great Lakes Res. pp. 735–742.
Ivey, G. N. & Hamblin, P. F. 1989Convection near the temperature density for high Rayleigh number, low aspect low aspect ratio, rectangular cavities. Trans. ASME C: J. Heat Transfer 111, 100–105. (referred to herein as IH).
Kulken, H. K. 1969 Free convection at low Prandtl numbers. J. Fluid. Mech. 37, 785–798.Google Scholar
Kulken, H. K. & Rotem, Z. 1971 Asymptoic solution for plume at very large and small Prandtl numbers. J. Fluid. Mech. 45, 585–600.Google Scholar
Lin, D. S. & Nansteel, M. W. 1987 Natural convection heat transfer in a square enclosure containing water near its density maximum. Intl. J. Heat Mass Transfer 30, 2319–2329.Google Scholar
Marmouch, Y. R., Smith, A. A. & Hamblin, P. F. 1984 Pilot experiments on thermal bar in lock exchange flow. J. Energy Engng ASCE. 23 273–282.Google Scholar
Moore, D. R. & Weiss, N. O. 1973 Non linear penetrative convection. J. Fluid. Mech. 61, 553–581.Google Scholar
Morton, B. R., Taylor, G. & Turner, J. S. 1956 Turbulent gravitational convection from maintained and instantaneous sources. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 234, 1–23.Google Scholar
Ostrach, S. 1953 An analysis of laminar free-convection flow and heat transfer about a flat plate parallel to the direction of the generating body force. NACA Rep. 1111.
Simpson, J. E. 1987 Gravity Currents in the Environment and the Laboratory. Ellis. Horwood.
Slater, L. 1960 Confluent Hypergemetric Functions. Cambridge University Press.
Turner, J. S. 1973 Buoyancy Effects in Fluids. Cambridge University Press.
Dyke, Van M. 1964 Perturbation Methods in Fluid. Mechanics. Academic Press.
Watson, A. 1972 Effect of inversion temperature on convection of water in an enclosed rectangular cavity. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Maths 25, 423–446.Google Scholar
Witte, E. 1902 Zur Theorie der Stromkabbelungen. Gaea 38 484–487.Google Scholar
Zilitinkevich, S. S.Kreiman, K. D. & Terzhevik, A. YU. 1992 The thermal bar. J. Fluid. Mech. 236, 27–42.Google Scholar