Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T13:36:30.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coherence decay and its impact on sound radiation by wavepackets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2014

André V. G. Cavalieri  and
Anurag Agarwal
André V. G. Cavalieri*
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, UK Divisão de Engenharia Aeronáutica, Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica, Brazil
Anurag Agarwal
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: andre@ita.br
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Wavepackets obtained by a linear stability analysis of the turbulent mean flow were shown in recent works to agree closely with some relevant statistics of turbulent jets, such as power spectral densities and averaged phases of flow fluctuations. However, when such wavepacket models were used to calculate the far-field sound, satisfactory agreement was only obtained for flows that were supersonic relative to the ambient speed of sound; attempts with subsonic flows led to errors of more than an order of magnitude. We investigate here the reasons for such discrepancies by developing the integral solution of the Helmholtz equation in terms of the cross-spectral densities of turbulent quantities. It is shown that agreement of a statistical source, such as would be obtained by the above-mentioned wavepacket models, in averaged amplitudes and phases in the near field is not a sufficient condition for exact agreement of the far-field sound. The sufficient condition is that, in addition to the amplitudes and phases, the statistical source should also match the coherence function of the flow fluctuations. This is exemplified in a model problem, where we show that the effect of coherence decay on sound radiation is more prominent for subsonic convection velocities, and its neglect leads to discrepancies of more than an order of magnitude in the far-field sound. For supersonic flows errors are reduced for the peak noise direction, but for other angles the coherence decay is also seen to have a significant effect. Coherence decay in the model source is seen to lead to similar decays in the coherence of two points in the far acoustic field, these decays being significantly faster for higher Mach numbers. The limitations of linear wavepacket models are illustrated with another simplified problem, showing that superposition of time-periodic solutions can lead to a correlation decay between two points. However, the coherence between any pair of points in such models remains unity, and cannot thus represent the behaviour observed in turbulent flows.

JFM classification

Acoustics: Acoustics Acoustics: Aeroacoustics Acoustics: Jet noise
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 748 , 10 June 2014 , pp. 399 - 415
Copyright
© 2014 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baqui, Y. B., Agarwal, A., Cavalieri, A. V. G. & Sinayoko, S.2013 Nonlinear and linear noise source mechanisms in subsonic jets. In 19th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit. Berlin, Germany.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogey, C. & Bailly, C. 2007 An analysis of the correlations between the turbulent flow and the sound pressure fields of subsonic jets. J. Fluid Mech. 583, 71–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breakey, D. E. S., Jordan, P., Cavalieri, A. V. G., Léon, O., Zhang, M., Lehnasch, G., Colonius, T. & Rodríguez, D.2013 Near-field wavepackets and the far-field sound of a subsonic jet. In 19th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit. Berlin, Germany.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavalieri, A. V. G., Jordan, P., Agarwal, A. & Gervais, Y. 2011 Jittering wavepacket models for subsonic jet noise. J. Sound Vib. 330 (18–19), 4474–4492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavalieri, A. V. G., Jordan, P., Colonius, T. & Gervais, Y. 2012 Axisymmetric superdirectivity in subsonic jets. J. Fluid Mech. 704, 388–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavalieri, A. V. G., Rodríguez, D., Jordan, P., Colonius, T. & Gervais, Y. 2013 Wavepackets in the velocity field of turbulent jets. J. Fluid Mech. 730, 559–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, L. C. & Lele, S. K. 2009 Linear and nonlinear processes in two-dimensional mixing layer dynamics and sound radiation. J. Fluid Mech. 625, 321–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, W. T.1966 Turbulence measurements relevant to jet noise. Tech. Rep. UTIAS Report no. 119. Institute for Aerospace Studies, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. & Wygnanski, I. 1987 The evolution of instabilities in the axisymmetric jet. Part 1. The linear growth of disturbances near the nozzle. J. Fluid Mech. 176, 191–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crighton, D. G. 1975 Basic principles of aerodynamic noise generation. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 16 (1), 31–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crighton, D. G. & Gaster, M. 1976 Stability of slowly diverging jet flow. J. Fluid Mech. 77 (2), 397–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crighton, D. G. & Huerre, P. 1990 Shear-layer pressure fluctuations and superdirective acoustic sources. J. Fluid Mech. 220, 355–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crow, S. C.1972 Acoustic gain of a turbulent jet. In Phys. Soc. Meeting, Univ. Colorado, Boulder, Paper IE, vol. 6.Google Scholar
Crow, S. C. & Champagne, F. H. 1971 Orderly structure in jet turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 48 (3), 547–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, P. O. A. L., Fisher, M. J. & Barratt, M. J. 1963 The characteristics of the turbulence in the mixing region of a round jet. J. Fluid Mech. 15 (03), 337–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ffowcs Williams, J. E. & Kempton, A. J. 1978 The noise from the large-scale structure of a jet. J. Fluid Mech. 84 (4), 673–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gudmundsson, K. & Colonius, T. 2011 Instability wave models for the near-field fluctuations of turbulent jets. J. Fluid Mech. 689, 97–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hileman, J. I., Thurow, B. S., Caraballo, E. J. & Samimy, M. 2005 Large-scale structure evolution and sound emission in high-speed jets: real-time visualization with simultaneous acoustic measurements. J. Fluid Mech. 544, 277–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussain, A. K. M. F. & Zaman, K. B. M. Q. 1981 The ‘preferred mode’ of the axisymmetric jet. J. Fluid Mech. 110, 39–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, P. & Colonius, T. 2013 Wavepackets and turbulent jet noise. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 45, 173–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juvé, D., Sunyach, M. & Comte-Bellot, G. 1980 Intermittency of the noise emission in subsonic cold jets. J. Sound Vib. 71, 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearney-Fischer, M., Sinha, A. & Samimy, M. 2013 Intermittent nature of subsonic jet noise. AIAA J. 51 (5), 1142–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerhervé, F., Fitzpatrick, J. & Jordan, P. 2006 The frequency dependence of jet turbulence for noise source modelling. J. Sound Vib. 296 (1), 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerhervé, F., Jordan, P., Cavalieri, A. V. G., Delville, J., Bogey, C. & Juvé, D. 2012 Educing the source mechanism associated with downstream radiation in subsonic jets. J. Fluid Mech. 710, 606–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kœnig, M., Cavalieri, A. V. G., Jordan, P., Delville, J., Gervais, Y. & Papamoschou, D. 2013 Farfield filtering and source imaging of subsonic jet noise. J. Sound Vib. 332 (18), 4067–4088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landahl, M. T. & Mollo-Christensen, E. 1988 Turbulence and Random Processes in Fluid Mechanics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Léon, O. & Brazier, J. -P.2013 Investigation of the near and far pressure fields of dual-stream jets using an Euler-based PSE model. In 19th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1952 On sound generated aerodynamically. I. General theory. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 211 (1107), 564–587.Google Scholar
Michalke, A. 1977 On the effect of spatial source coherence on the radiation of jet noise. J. Sound Vib. 55 (3), 377–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mollo-Christensen, E. 1967 Jet noise and shear flow instability seen from an experimenter’s viewpoint (similarity laws for jet noise and shear flow instability as suggested by experiments). Trans. ASME J. Appl. Mech. 34, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, P. J. & Zaman, K. B. M. Q. 2010 Velocity measurements in jets with application to noise source modeling. J. Sound Vib. 329 (4), 394–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reba, R., Narayanan, S. & Colonius, T. 2010 Wavepacket models for large-scale mixing noise. Intl J. Aeroacoust. 9 (4), 533–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, P. J. & Henningson, D. S. 2001 Stability and Transition in Shear Flows. vol. 142. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, A., Rodríguez, D., Brès, G. A. & Colonius, T. 2014 Wavepacket models for supersonic jet noise. J. Fluid Mech. 742, 71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, T. 2013 Coherent noise sources of a subsonic round jet investigated using hydrodynamic and acoustic phased-microphone arrays. J. Fluid Mech. 730, 659–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, T. & Colonius, T. 2006 Instability waves in a subsonic round jet detected using a near-field phased microphone array. J. Fluid Mech. 565, 197–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tam, C. K. W. & Burton, D. E. 1984 Sound generated by instability waves of supersonic flows. Part 2. Axisymmetric jets. J. Fluid Mech. 138 (138), 273–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tam, C. K. W., Viswanathan, K., Ahuja, K. K. & Panda, J. 2008 The sources of jet noise: experimental evidence. J. Fluid Mech. 615, 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar