Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-bvshn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-01T09:18:24.136Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Continuum dynamics of suspensions at low Reynolds number – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2025

Abstract

Information

Type
Corrigendum
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

We thank an annonymous reviewer for pointing out that (5.4) was not frame invariant. This error was due to an algebraic mistake and a mislabeling of the second and third indices of the Levi-Civita tensor in (3.3). Equation (3.3) should have been

(0.1) \begin{equation} 4{\widehat {F}}^1_{ij}-{\widehat {F}}^1_{ji} = -20\pi \eta _0a^3\left (\frac {\partial v_{-m,i}}{\partial x_j} - \epsilon _{ikj}\omega _{p,k}\right ), \end{equation}

and the correct version of (5.4) is

(0.2) \begin{equation} \epsilon _{ikj}\omega _{p,k} = \frac {1}{2}\left (\frac {\partial \langle v\rangle _{-m,i}}{\partial x_j} - \frac {\partial \langle v\rangle _{-m,j}}{\partial x_i}\right ), \end{equation}

which includes a factor of one-half and gives that the average local rotational rate of the particles is equal to the suspension-averaged rotational rate.

We also found that while (3.7) does lead to the correct divergence of the stress tensor, in the stress tensor itself ${\widehat {\mathbf{F}}}^{\,2}$ should be symmetric on exchange of the second and third indices:

(0.3) \begin{eqnarray} {\widehat {F}}^2_{ijk} &=& - \frac {\pi \eta _0a^5}{6}\left (5\frac {\partial ^2 v_{-m,i}}{\partial x_j\partial x_k} + \frac {\partial ^2 v_{-m,j}}{\partial x_i\partial x_k} + \frac {\partial ^2 v_{-m,k}}{\partial x_i\partial x_j} \right )\nonumber \\ && + \frac {\pi \eta _0a^5}{6}\big ({\nabla} ^2 v_{-m,i}\delta _{jk} + 3{\nabla} ^2 v_{-m,j}\delta _{ik} + 3{\nabla} ^2 v_{-m,k} \delta _{ij}\big ). \end{eqnarray}

Finally, there was a typographical error in the coefficients that we reported for the normal stress differences. The last sentence of § 7 should have read, `Fitting the high-Pe results to a cubic polynomial, we estimate that $\sigma _{xx}-\sigma _{zz} \approx -\eta _0{\dot {\gamma }} (0.066\phi ^2 + 0.35\phi ^3 )$ and $\sigma _{xx}-\sigma _{yy} \approx -\eta _0{\dot {\gamma }} (0.37\phi ^2 + 1.9\phi ^3 )$ at large Pe.’

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

References

Wolgemuth, C.W. & Palos-Chavez, J.I. 2023 Continuum dynamics of suspensions at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 966, A16.10.1017/jfm.2023.418CrossRefGoogle Scholar