Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:43:02.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Damping of inertial motions by parametric subharmonic instability in baroclinic currents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2014

Leif N. Thomas*
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
John R. Taylor
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
*
Email address for correspondence: leift@stanford.edu

Abstract

A new damping mechanism for vertically-sheared inertial motions is described involving an inertia–gravity wave that oscillates at half the inertial frequency, $f$, and that grows at the expense of inertial shear. This parametric subharmonic instability forms in baroclinic, geostrophic currents where thermal wind shear, by reducing the potential vorticity of the fluid, allows inertia–gravity waves with frequencies less than $f$. A stability analysis and numerical simulations are used to study the instability criterion, energetics, and finite-amplitude behaviour of the instability. For a flow with uniform shear and stratification, parametric subharmonic instability develops when the Richardson number of the geostrophic current nears $Ri_{PSI}=4/3+\gamma \cos \phi $, where $\gamma $ is the ratio of the inertial to thermal wind shear magnitude and $\phi $ is the angle between the inertial and thermal wind shears at the initial time. Inertial shear enters the instability criterion because it can also modify the potential vorticity and hence the minimum frequency of inertia–gravity waves. When this criterion is met, inertia–gravity waves with a frequency $f/2$ and with flow parallel to isopycnals amplify, extracting kinetic energy from the inertial shear through shear production. The solutions of the numerical simulations are consistent with these predictions and additionally show that finite-amplitude parametric subharmonic instability both damps inertial shear and is itself damped by secondary shear instabilities. In this way, parametric subharmonic instability opens a pathway to turbulence where kinetic energy in inertial shear is transferred to small scales and dissipated.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2014 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alford, M. & Gregg, M. 2001 Near-inertial mixing: Modulation of shear, strain and microstructure at low latitude. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 1694716968.Google Scholar
Craik, A. D. D. 1989 The stability of unbounded two- and three-dimensional flows subject to body forces: some exact solutions. J. Fluid Mech. 198, 275292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, R. & Wunsch, C. 2009 Ocean circulation kinetic energy: Reservoirs, sources, and sinks. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 41, 253282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox-Kemper, B., Danabasoglu, G., Ferrari, R., Griffies, S. M., Hallberg, R. W., Holland, M. M., Maltrud, M. E., Peacock, S. & Samuels, B. L. 2011 Parameterization of mixed layer eddies. III: Implementation and impact in global ocean climate simulations. Ocean Model. 39, 6178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoskins, B. J. 1974 The role of potential vorticity in symmetric stability and instability. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 100, 480482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoskins, B. J. 1982 The mathematical theory of frontogenesis. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 14, 131151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunze, E., Schmitt, R. W. & Toole, J. M. 1995 The energy balance in a warm-core ring’s near-inertial critical layer. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 25, 942957.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, P., Holloway, G., Henyey, F. & Pomphrey, N. 1986 Nonlinear interactions among internal gravity waves. Rev. Geophys. 24, 493536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagasawa, M., Niwa, Y. & Hibiya, T. 2000 Spatial and temporal distribution of the wind-induced internal wave energy available for deep water mixing in the North Pacific. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 1393313943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natarov, A. & Richards, K. J. 2009 Three-dimensional instabilities of oscillatory equatorial zonal shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 623, 5974.Google Scholar
d’Orgeville, M. & Hua, B. L. 2005 Equatorial inertial-parametric instability of zonally symmetric oscillating shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 531, 261291.Google Scholar
Plueddemann, A. J. & Farrar, J. T. 2006 Observations and models of the energy flux from the wind to mixed-layer inertial currents. Deep-Sea Res. II 53, 530.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R.2008 Numerical simulations of the stratified oceanic bottom boundary layer. PhD thesis, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. & Ferrari, R. 2009 The role of secondary shear instabilities in the equilibration of symmetric instability. J. Fluid Mech. 622, 103113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. & Ferrari, R. 2010 Buoyancy and wind-driven convection at a mixed-layer density front. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 40, 12221242.Google Scholar
Thomas, L. N. 2005 Destruction of potential vorticity by winds. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 35, 24572466.Google Scholar
Thomas, L. N. & Taylor, J. R. 2010 Reduction of the usable wind-work on the general circulation by forced symmetric instability. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L18606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitt, D. B. & Thomas, L. N. 2013 Near-inertial waves in strongly baroclinic currents. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 43, 706725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar