Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-01T03:03:38.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of blade sweep on the reduction and enhancement of supersonic propeller noise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

A. B. Parry
A. B. Parry
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XH, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An asymptotic frequency-domain approach is used to describe the radiation from a supersonic swept propeller within the framework of linear acoustics. With this approach the radiation of singularities, their points of origin on the blades, and their relation to blade geometry and loading are easily obtained. In particular, it is shown that a swept propeller with a completely subsonic leading edge can still radiate singularities, if the leading edge is blunt, due to a supersonic edge effect at the blade tips. In addition, the radiation from a family of ‘critical’ swept-blade designs is shown to be more singular than that from a straight-bladed design. Numerical and asymptotic results for such designs show that the peak radiation is, typically, increased by 5–10 dB.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 293 , 25 June 1995 , pp. 181 - 206
Copyright
© 1995 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amiet, R. K. 1988 Thickness noise of a propeller and its relation to blade sweep. J. Fluid Mech. 192, 535–560.Google Scholar
Bleistein, N. & Handelsman, R. A. 1969 Uniform asymptotic expansions of double integrals. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 27, 434–453.Google Scholar
Chako, N. 1965 Asymptotic expansions of double and multiple integrals occurring in diffraction theory. J. Inst. Maths Applics. 1, 372–422.Google Scholar
Chapman, C. J. 1988 Shocks and singularities in the pressure field of a supersonically rotating propeller. J. Fluid Mech. 192, 1–16.Google Scholar
Crighton, D. G. & Parry, A. B. 1991 Asymptotic theory of propeller noise part II: supersonic single-rotation propeller. AIAA J. 29, 2031–2037.Google Scholar
Crighton, D. G. & Parry, A. B. 1992 Higher approximations in the asymptotic theory of propeller noise. AIAA J. 30, 23–28.Google Scholar
Dingle, R. B. 1973 Asymptotic Expansions: their Derivation and Interpretation. Academic.
Gradshteyn, I. S. & Ryzhik, I. M. 1965 Table of Integrals, Series, and Products. Academic.
Hanson, D. B. 1980a Influence of propeller design parameters on far field harmonic noise in forward flight. AIAA J. 18, 1313–1319.Google Scholar
Hanson, D. B. 1980b Helicoidal surface theory for harmonic noise of propellers in the far field. AIAA J. 18, 1213–1220.Google Scholar
Hawkings, D. L. & Lowson, M. V. 1974 Theory of open supersonic rotor noise. J. Sound Vib. 36, 1–20.Google Scholar
Jones, D. S. & Kline, M. 1958 Asymptotic expansions of multiple integrals and the method of stationary phase. J. Math. Phys. 37, 1–28.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1958 An Introduction to Fourier Analysis and Generalised Functions. Cambridge University Press.
Metzger, F. B. & Rohrbach, C. 1979 Aeroacoustic design of the propfan. AIAA Paper 79–0610.
Metzger, F. B. & Rohrbach, C. 1985 Benefits of blade sweep for advanced turboprops. AIAA Paper 85–1260.
Parry, A. B. & Crighton, D. G. 1989 Asymptotic theory of propeller noise part I: subsonic single-rotation propeller. AIAA J. 27, 1184–1190.Google Scholar
Tam, C. K. W. 1983 On linear acoustic solutions of high speed helicopter impulsive noise problems. J. Sound Vib. 89, 119–134.Google Scholar
Tam, C. K. W. & Salikuddin, M. 1986 Weakly nonlinear acoustic and shock-wave theory of the noise of advanced high-speed turbopropellers. J. Fluid Mech. 164, 127–154.Google Scholar