Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:27:44.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of deceleration on jet instability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2003

VLADIMIR SHTERN
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-4006, USA
FAZLE HUSSAIN
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-4006, USA

Abstract

A non-parallel analysis of time-oscillatory instability of conical jets reveals important features not found in prior studies. Flow deceleration significantly enhances the shear-layer instability for both swirl-free and swirling jets. In swirl-free jets, flow deceleration causes the axisymmetric instability (absent in the parallel approximation). The critical Reynolds number $\hbox{\it Re}_{a}$ for this instability is an order of magnitude smaller than the critical $\hbox{\it Re}_{a}$ predicted before for the helical instability (where $\hbox{\it Re}_{a}= rv_{a}/\nu, r$ is the distance from the jet source, $v_a$ is the jet maximum velocity at a given $r$, and $\nu$ is the viscosity). Swirl, intensifying the divergence of streamlines, induces an additional, divergent instability (which occurs even in shear-free flows). For the swirl Reynolds number $\hbox{\it Re}_s$ (circulation to viscosity ratio) exceeding 3, the critical $\hbox{\it Re}_a$ for the single-helix counter-rotating mode becomes smaller than those for axisymmetric and multi-helix modes. Since the critical $\hbox{\it Re}_s$ is less than 10 for the near-axis jets, the boundary-layer approximation (used before) is invalid, as is Long's Type II boundary-layer solution (whose stability has been extensively studied). Thus, the non-parallel character of jets strongly affects their stability. Our results, obtained in a far-field approximation allowing reduction of the linear stability problem to ordinary differential equations, are more valid for short wavelengths.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)