Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:44:15.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Entrainment in a shear-free turbulent mixing layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

D. A. Briggs ,
J. H. Ferziger ,
J. R. Koseff  and
S. G. Monismith
D. A. Briggs
Affiliation:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94309-4020, USA Present address: Contra Costa Water District, PO Box H20, Concord, CA 94524, USA.
J. H. Ferziger
Affiliation:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94309-4020, USA
J. R. Koseff
Affiliation:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94309-4020, USA
S. G. Monismith
Affiliation:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94309-4020, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Results from a direct numerical simulation of a shear-free turbulent mixing layer are presented. The mixing mechanisms associated with the turbulence are isolated. In the first set of simulations, the turbulent mixing layer decays as energy is exchanged between the layers. Energy spectra with E(k) ∼ k2 and E(k) ∼ k4 dependence at low wavenumber are used to initialize the flow to investigate the effect of initial conditions. The intermittency of the mixing layer is quantified by the skewness and kurtosis of the velocity fields: results compare well with the shearless mixing layer experiments of Veeravalli & Warhaft (1989). Eddies of size of the integral scale (k3/2/∈) penetrate the mixing layer intermittently, transporting energy and causing the layer to grow. The turbulence in the mixing layer can be characterized by eddies with relatively large vertical kinetic energy and vertical length scale. In the second set of simulations, a forced mixing layer is created by continuously supplying energy in a local region to maintain a stationary kinetic energy profile. Assuming the spatial decay of r.m.s. velocity is of the form u &∞ yn, predictions of common two-equation turbulence models yield values of n ranging from -1.25 to -2.5. An exponent of -1.35 is calculated from the forced mixing layer simulation. In comparison, oscillating grid experiments yield decay exponents between n = -1 (Hannoun et al. 1989) and n = -1.5 (Nokes 1988). Reynolds numbers of 40 and 58, based on Taylor microscale, are obtained in the decaying and forced simulations, respectively. Components of the turbulence models proposed by Mellor & Yamada (1986) and Hanjalić & Launder (1972) are analysed. Although the isotropic models underpredict the turbulence transport, more complicated anisotropic models do not represent a significant improvement. Models for the pressure-strain tensor, based on the anisotropy tensor, performed adequately.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 310 , 10 March 1996 , pp. 215 - 241
Copyright
© 1996 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batchelor, G. K. 1953 The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence. Cambridge University Press.
Bradshaw, P. 1975 An Introduction to Turbulence and its Measurement. Pergamon
Breidenthal, R. E. 1992 Entrainment at thin stratified interfaces: The effects of Schmidt, Richardson, and Reynolds number. Phys. Fluids A 4, 2141–2144.Google Scholar
Chasnov, J. R. 1994 Similarity states of passive scalar transport in isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 6, 1036–1051.Google Scholar
Craft, T. J., Graham, L. J. W. & Launder, B. E. 1993 Impinging jet studies for turbulent model assessment-II. An examination of the performance of four turbulent models. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 36, 2685–2697.Google Scholar
De Silva, I. P. D., & Fernando, H. J. S. 1992 Some aspects of mixing in a stratified turbulent patch. J. Fluid Mech. 240, 601–625.Google Scholar
Fernando, H. J. S. 1991 Turbulent mixing in stratified fluids. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23, 455–93.Google Scholar
Gad El Hak, M. & Corrsin, S. 1974 Measurements of the nearly isotropic turbulence behind a uniform jet grid. J. Fluid Mech. 62, 115–143.Google Scholar
Hanjalića, K. & Launder, B. E. 1972 A Reynolds stress model of turbulence and its application to thin shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 52, 609–638 (referred to herein as HL).Google Scholar
Hannoun, I. A., Fernando, H. J. S. & List, E. J. 1989 Turbulence structure near a sharp density interface. J. Fluid Mech. 180, 189–209.Google Scholar
Holt, S. E., Koseff, J. R. & Ferziger, J. H. 1992 A numerical study of the evolution and structure of homogeneous stably stratified sheared turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 237, 499–539.Google Scholar
Hopfinger, E. J. & Toly, J.-A. 1976 Spatially decaying turbulence and its relation to mixing across density interfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 78, 155–175.Google Scholar
Imberger, J. & Patterson, J. C. 1990 Physical limnology. In Advances in Applied Mechanics, pp. 303–475. Academic.
Jayesh & Warhaft, Z. 1994 Turbulent penetration of a thermally stratified interfacial layer in a wind tunnel. J. Fluid Mech. 277, 23–54.Google Scholar
Laporta, A., Shao, L. & Bertoglio, J. P 1995 A two-point model for inhomogeneous turbulence and comparisons with large-eddy simulation. Abstract submitted to the Tenth Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, Penn State, 1995.
Launder, B. E. 1990 A preview of turbulence modelling at UMIST. Presented at UMIST 4th Biennial Colloquium on Computational Fluid Dynamics, Manchester Univ., 1990.
Lee, M. J. & Reynolds, W. C. 1985 Numerical experiments on the structure of homogeneous turbulence. Rep. TF-24. Mechanical Engineering Dept, Stanford University.
Long, R. R. 1978 A theory of mixing in a stably stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 84, 113–124.Google Scholar
Mellor, G. L. & Yamada, T. 1986 Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 20, 851–875 (referred to herein as MY).Google Scholar
Nokes, R. I. 1988 On the entrainment across a density interface. J. Fluid Mech. 188, 185–204.Google Scholar
Pope, S. B. & Haworth, D. C. 1987 The mixing layer between turbulent fields of different scale. In Turbulent Shear Flows 5 (ed. L. T. S. Bradbury et al.), pp. 44–53. Springer.
Riley, J. J., Metcalfe, R. W. & Weissman, M. A. 1981 Direct numerical simulations of homogeneous turbulence in density stratified fluids. In Non-linear Properties of Internal Waves (ed. B. J. West), AIP Conf. Proc. Vol 76, pp. 78–110.
Rogallo, R. S. 1981 Numerical experiments in homogeneous turbulence. NASA Tech. Mem. 81835.
Rotta, J. C. 1951 Statistische Theorie nichthomogener Turbulenz. Z. Phys. 129, 547–572.Google Scholar
Veeravalli, S. & Warhaft, Z. 1989 The shearless turbulence mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 207, 191–229.Google Scholar
White, F.M. 1974 Viscous Fluid Flow. McGraw-Hill
Wilcox, D. C. 1988 Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models. AIAA J. 26, 1299–1310.Google Scholar