Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:06:53.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental study of bore run-up

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Harry H. Yeh ,
Abdulhamid Ghazali  and
Ingunn Marton
Harry H. Yeh
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, FX-10, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
Abdulhamid Ghazali
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, FX-10, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
Ingunn Marton
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, FX-10, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bore propagation near the shoreline, the transition from bore to wave run-up, and the ensuing run-up motion on a uniformly sloping beach are investigated experimentally. As a bore approaches the shoreline, the propagation speed first decelerates by compressing its wave form and then suddenly accelerates at the shoreline. Although this behaviour is qualitatively in agreement with the inviscid shallow-water wave prediction (often called the ‘bore collapse’ phenomenon), unlike the genuine bore-collapse phenomenon, the acceleration is caused by the ‘momentum exchange’ process, i.e. collision of the bore against the initially quiescent water along the shoreline. Owing to this momentum exchange, a single bore motion degenerates into two successive run-up water masses; one involves a turbulent run-up water motion followed by the original incident wave motion. The transition process from undular bore to wave run-up appears to be different from that of a fully developed bore. The bore front overturns directly onto the dry beach surface, and the run-up is characterized by a thin splashed-up flow layer.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 206 , September 1989 , pp. 563 - 578
Copyright
© 1989 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hibberd, S. & Peregrine, D. H. 1979 Surf and run-up on a beach: a uniform bore. J. Fluid Mech. 95, 323–345.Google Scholar
Ho, D. V. & Meyer, R. E. 1962 Climb of a bore on a beach. Part 1: Uniform beach slope. J. Fluid Mech. 14, 305–318.Google Scholar
Ho, D. V., Meyer, R. E., & Shen, M. C. 1963 Long surf. J. Mar. Res. 21, 219–232.Google Scholar
Keller, H. B., Levine, D. A. & Whitham, G. B. 1960 Motion of a bore over a sloping beach. J. Fluid Mech. 7, 302–316.Google Scholar
Madsen, P. A. & Svendsen, I. A. 1983 Turbulent bores and hydraulic jumps. J. Fluid Mech. 129, 1–25.Google Scholar
Miller, R. L. 1968 Experimental determination of run-up of undular and fully developed bores. J. Geophys. Res. 73, 4497–4510.Google Scholar
Packwood, A. R. & Peregrine, D. H. 1981 Surf and run-up on beaches: models of viscous effects. Rep. AM-81-07. University of Bristol. 34 pp.
Peregrine, D. H. & Svendsen, I. A. 1978 Spilling breakers, bores and hydraulic jumps. Proc. 16th Conf. Coastal Engng, pp. 540–550.
Shen, M. C. & Meyer, R. E. 1963 Climb of a bore on a beach. Part 3. Run-up. J. Fluid Mech. 16, 113–125.Google Scholar
Svendsen, I. A. & Madsen, P. A. 1984 A turbulent bore on a beach. J. Fluid Mech. 148, 73–96.Google Scholar
Svendsen, I. A., Madsen, P. A. & Hansen, J. B. 1978 Wave characteristics in the surf zone. Proc. 16th Conf. Coastal Engng. pp. 520–539.
Whitham, G. B. 1958 On the propagation of shock waves through regions of non-uniform area of flow. J. Fluid Mech. 4, 337–360.Google Scholar
Yeh, H. H. & Ghazali, A. 1986 Nearshore behavior of bore on a uniformly sloping beach. Proc. 20th Conf. Coastal Engng, pp. 877–888.
Yeh, H. H. & Ghazali, A. 1988 On bore collapse. J. Geophys. Res. 93, 6930–6936.Google Scholar
Yeh, H. H. & Mok, K. M. 1989. On turbulence in bores. Phys. Fluids (submitted).Google Scholar