Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-vhqbp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T14:18:41.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The force exerted on a body in inviscid unsteady non-uniform rotational flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

T. R. Auton ,
J. C. R. Hunt  and
M. Prud'Homme
T. R. Auton
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK
J. C. R. Hunt
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK
M. Prud'Homme
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A general expression is derived for the fluid force on a body of simple shape moving with a velocity v through inviscid fluid in which there is an unsteady non-uniform rotational velocity field u0(x,t) in two or three dimensions. It is assumed that the radius is small compared with the scale over which the strain rate changes, though for the sphere it is also assumed that the changes in the ambient velocity field over the scale of the sphere are small compared with the velocity of the body relative to the flow. Given these approximations it is shown that the effects of the rate of change of the vorticity of the ambient flow is of second order and can be neglected. However the rate of change of the irrotational straining motion is included in the analysis. It is shown that the inertial forces derived by many authors for irrotational flow can be simply added to a generalization of the lift force derived by Auton (1987) in a companion paper. It is shown how this lift force is made up of a rotational and an inertial or added-mass component. For three-dimensional bluff bodies the latter is generally larger (by a factor of three for a sphere), and can be simply calculated from the added-mass coefficient. For illustration, the general expression is used to derive formulae for (i) the motion of a spherical bubble in a steady non-uniform flow to contrast with the motion in an unsteady flow, and (ii) the motion of rigid volumes of neutral density across an inviscid shear flow. These results show how added-mass (and lift) forces lead to different motions for a sphere and a cylinder. The general expression is useful in two-phase flow calculations, and for indicating the forces and motions of ‘lumps of fluid’ in turbulent flows.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 197 , December 1988 , pp. 241 - 257
Copyright
© 1988 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Auton, T. R.1983 The dynamics of bubbles, drops and particles in motion in liquids. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Auton, T. R.1987 The lift force on a spherical body in a rotational flow. J. Fluid Mech. 183, 199.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K.1967 An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
Beyerlein, S. W., Cossmann, R. K. & Richter, H. J.1985 Prediction of bubble concentration profiles in vertical turbulent two-phase flows. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 11, 629.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R.1987 Vorticity and vortex dynamics in complex turbulent flows. Trans. Can. Soc. Mech. Engrs 11, 21–35.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R., Auton, T. R., Sene, K., Thomas, N. H. & Kowe, R. 1988 Bubble motions in large eddies and turbulent flows. Proc. Conf. Transient Phenomena in Multiphase Flow, Yugoslavia, May. Hemisphere (in press).
Kowe, R., Hunt, J. C. R., Hunt, A., Couet, B. & Bradbury, L. J. S. 1988 The effects of bubbles on the volume fluxes and the pressure gradients in unsteady and non-uniform flow of liquids. Intl J. Multiphase Flow (in press).Google Scholar
Landweber, L. & Miloh, T.1980 Unsteady Lagally theory for multipoles and deformable bodies. J. Fluid Mech. 96, 333–346 (and Corrigendum 112, 1982, 502).Google Scholar
L'Huillier, D.1982 Forces d'inertie sur une bulle en expansion se deplacent dans un fluids. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 295, II, 95–98.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J.1956 The image system of a vortex element in a rigid sphere. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 52, 31.Google Scholar
Prandtl, L.1925 Uber die ausgebildete turbulenz. Z. Angew. Maths. Mech. 36, 136.Google Scholar
Sarpkaya, T. & Isaacson, M.1981 Mechanisms of Wave Forces on Off-shore Structures. Van Nostrand.
Sene, K.1985 Aspects of bubbly two-phase flow. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Taylor, G. I.1928 The forces on a body placed in a curved or converging stream of fluid. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 120, 260.Google Scholar
Thomas, N. H., Auton, T. R., Sene, K. J. & Hunt, J. C. R. 1983 Entrapment and transport of bubbles by transient large eddies in multiphase turbulent shear flows. BHRA Intl Conf. on the Physical Modelling of Multiphase Flows, Coventry, April (1983), pp. 169–184. (Also 1984 Entrapment and transport of bubbles in plunging water. In Gas Transfer at Water Surfaces (ed. W. Brutsaert & G. H. Jirka), p. 255. Reidel.)
Tollmien, W.1938 Uber krafte und momente in schwach gekrummten oder konvergenten stromungen. Ing.-Arch. 9, 308.Google Scholar
Voinov, V. V., Voinov, O. V. & Petrov, A. G.1973 Hydrodynamic interactions between bodies in a perfect incompressible fluid and their motion in non-uniform streams. Prikl. Math. Mekh. 37, 680–689.Google Scholar