Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:43:16.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of boundary-layer disturbances on the instability of a roughness wake in a high-speed boundary layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2014

Nicola De Tullio Open the ORCID record for Nicola De Tullio [Opens in a new window]  and
Neil D. Sandham
Nicola De Tullio*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK
Neil D. Sandham
Affiliation:
Aeronautics and Astronautics, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: n.de-tullio@imperial.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The excitation of instability modes in the wake generated behind a discrete roughness element in a boundary layer at Mach 6 is analysed through numerical simulations of the compressible Navier–Stokes equations. Recent experimental observations show that transition to turbulence in high-speed boundary layers during re-entry flight is dominated by wall roughness effects. Therefore, understanding the roughness-induced transition to turbulence in this flow regime is of primary importance. Our results show that a discrete roughness element with a height of about half the local boundary-layer thickness generates an unstable wake able to sustain the growth of a number of modes. The most unstable of these modes are a sinuous mode (mode SL) and two varicose modes (modes VL and VC). The varicose modes grow approximately 17 % faster than the most unstable Mack mode and their growth persists over a longer streamwise distance, thereby leading to a notable acceleration of the laminar–turbulent transition process. Two main mechanisms are identified for the excitation of wake modes: the first is based on the interaction between the external disturbances and the reverse flow regions induced by the roughness element and the second is due to the interaction between the boundary-layer modes (first modes and Mack modes) and the non-parallel roughness wake. An important finding of the present study is that, while being less unstable, mode SL is the preferred instability for the first of the above excitation mechanisms, which drives the wake modes excitation in the absence of boundary-layer modes. Modes VL and VC are excited through the second mechanism and, hence, become important when first modes and Mack modes come into interaction with the roughness wake. The new mode VC presents similarities with the Mack mode instability, including the tuning between its most unstable wavelength and the local boundary-layer thickness, and it is believed to play a fundamental role in the roughness-induced transition of high-speed boundary layers. In contrast to the smooth-wall case, wall cooling is stabilising for all the roughness-wake modes.

JFM classification

Compressible Flows: Compressible boundary layers Instability: Instability Instability: Transition to turbulence
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 763 , 25 January 2015 , pp. 136 - 165
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2014 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernardini, M., Pirozzoli, S., Orlandi, P. & Lele, S. K. 2014 Parametrization of boundary-layer transition induced by isolated roughness elements. AIAA J. 52 (10), 2261–2269.Google Scholar
Berry, S. A. & Horvath, T. J. 2008 Discrete-roughness transition for hypersonic flight vehicles. J. Spacecr. Rockets 45 (2), 216–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borg, M. P. & Schneider, S. P. 2008 Effect of freestream noise on roughness-induced transition for the X-51A forebody. J. Spacecr. Rockets 45 (6), 1106–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, L., Schlatter, P. & Henningson, D. S. 2004 Transition in boundary layers subject to free-stream turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 517, 167–198.Google Scholar
Carpenter, M. H., Nordstrom, J. & Gottlieb, D. 1999 A stable and conservative interface treatment of arbitrary spatial accuracy. J. Comput. Phys. 148, 341–365.Google Scholar
Chang, C. L., Choudhari, M. M. & Li, F.2010 Numerical computations of hypersonic boundary-layer over surface irregularities. AIAA Paper 2010-1572.Google Scholar
Chang, C. L., Choudhari, M. M. & Li, F.2011 Effects of cavities and protuberances on transition over hypersonic vehicles. AIAA 2011-3245.Google Scholar
Choudhari, M., Li, F., Chang, C. L., Norris, A. & Edwards, J.2013 Wake instabilities behind discrete roughness elements in high speed boundary layers. AIAA 2013-0081.Google Scholar
Choudhari, M., Li, F., Minwei, W., Chang, C. L. & Edwards, J.2010 Laminar–turbulent transition behind discrete roughness elements in a high-speed boundary layer. AIAA 2010-1575.Google Scholar
Choudhari, M. & Street, C. L. 1992 A finite Reynolds-number approach for the prediction of boundary-layer receptivity in localized regions. Phys. Fluids A 4 (11), 2495–2514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corke, T. C., Bar-Server, A. & Morkovin, M. V. 1986 Experiments on transition enhancement by distributed roughness. Phys. Fluids 29 (10), 3199–3213.Google Scholar
Crouch, J. D. 1992 Localized receptivity of boundary layers. Phys. Fluids A 4 (7), 1408–1414.Google Scholar
De Tullio, N.2013 Receptivity and transtion to turbulence of supersonic boundary layers with surface roughness. PhD thesis, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.Google Scholar
De Tullio, N., Paredes, P., Sandham, N. D. & Theofilis, V. 2013 Laminar–turbulent transition induced by a discrete roughness element in a supersonic boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 735, 613–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Tullio, N. & Sandham, N. D. 2010 Direct numerical simulation of breakdown to turbulence in a Mach 6 boundary layer over a porous surface. Phys. Fluids 22, 094105.Google Scholar
De Tullio, N. & Sandham, N. D.2012 Direct numerical simulations of roughness receptivity and transitional shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions. RTO-MP-AVT-200. Art. 22. NATO.Google Scholar
Fiala, A., Hillier, R. & Estruch-Samper, D. 2014 Roughness-induced turbulent wedges in a hypersonic blunt-body boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 754, 208–231.Google Scholar
Fujii, K. 2006 Experiment of the two-dimensional roughness effect on hypersonic boundary-layer transition. J. Spacecr. Rockets 43 (4), 731–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaster, M., Grosch, C. E. & Jackson, T. L. 1994 The velocity field created by a shallow bump in a boundary layer. Phys. Fluids 6 (9), 3079–3085.Google Scholar
Goldstein, M. E. 1985 Scattering of acoustic waves into Tollmien–Schlichting waves by small streamwise variations in surface geometry. J. Fluid Mech. 154, 509–529.Google Scholar
Groskopf, G. & Kloker, M. J.2012 Stability analysis of three-dimensional hypersonic boundary-layer flows with discrete surface roughness. Tech. Rep. RTO-MP-AVT-200 (30). NATO.Google Scholar
Groskopf, G., Kloker, M. J. & Marxen, O. 2009 Bi-global crossplane stability analysis of high-speed boundary-layer flows with discrete roughness. In IUTAM Symposium on Laminar–Turbulent Transition (ed. Henningson, D. & Schlatter, P.), pp. 171–176. Springer.Google Scholar
Horvath, T. J., Zalameda, J. N., Wood, A. W. & Berry, S. A.2012 Global infrared observations of roughness induced transition on the space shuttle orbiter. Tech. Rep. RTO-MP-AVT-200 (27). NATO.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R. & Durbin, P. A. 1999 Perturbed vortical layers and shear sheltering. Fluid Dyn. Res. 24, 375–404.Google Scholar
Iyer, P. S. & Mahesh, K. 2013 High-speed boundary-layer transition induced by a discrete roughness element. J. Fluid Mech. 729, 524–562.Google Scholar
Jacobs, R. G. & Durbin, P. A. 2001 Simulations of bypass transition. J. Fluid Mech. 428, 185–212.Google Scholar
Jones, L. E.2008 Numerical study of the flow around an airfoil at low Reynolds number. PhD thesis, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.Google Scholar
Joslin, R. D. & Grosch, C. E. 1995 Growth characteristics downstream of a shallow bump: computation and experiment. Phys. Fluids 7 (12), 3042–3047.Google Scholar
Kachanov, K., Kozlov, V. V. & Levchenko, V. Y. 1979 Origin of Tollmien–Schlichting waves in boundary layer under the influence of external disturbances. Fluid Dyn. 13, 704–711.Google Scholar
Kegerise, M., King, R., Owens, L., Choudhari, M., Li, F., Chang, C. L. & Norris, A.2012 An experimental and numerical study of roughness-induced instabilities in a Mach 3.5 boundary layer. RTO-MP-AVT-200. Art. 29. NATO.Google Scholar
Kegerise, M. A., Owens, L. R. & Rudolf, A. K.2010 High-speed boundary-layer transition induced by an isolated roughness element. AIAA 2010-4999.Google Scholar
Klebanoff, P. S. & Tidstrom, K. D. 1972 Mechanism by which a two-dimensional roughness element induces boundary layer transition. Phys. Fluids 15 (7), 1173–1188.Google Scholar
Li, Q.2003 Numerical study of the Mach number effect in compressible wall-bounded turbulence. PhD thesis, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.Google Scholar
Mack, L. M.1984 Boundary layer linear stability theory. Tech. Rep. 705. AGARD.Google Scholar
Marxen, O., Iaccarino, G. & Shaqfeh, S. G. 2010 Disturbance evolution in a Mach 4.8 boundary layer with two-dimensional roughness-induced separation and shock. J. Fluid Mech. 648, 435–469.Google Scholar
Owens, L. R., Kegerise, M. A. & Wilkinson, S. P.2011 Off-body boundary-layer measurement techniques development for supersonic low-disturbance flows. AIAA 2011-0284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paredes, P., De Tullio, N., Sandham, N. D. & Theofilis, V. 2013 Laminar–turbulent transition induced by a discrete roughness element in a supersonic boundary-layer. In International Conference on Instability and Control of Massively Separated Flows (ICOMASeF). Springer.Google Scholar
Reda, D. C. 2002 Review and synthesis of roughness-dominated transition correlations for reentry vehicles. J. Spacecr. Rockets 39 (2), 161–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redford, J. A., Sandham, N. D. & Roberts, G. T. 2010 Compressibility effects on boundary-layer transition induced by an isolated roughness element. AIAA J. 48 (12), 2818–2830.Google Scholar
Reshotko, E. & Tumin, A. 2004 Role of transient growth on roughness-induced transition. AIAA J. 42 (4), 766–770.Google Scholar
Rizzetta, D. P. & Visbal, M. R. 2007 Direct numerical simulations of flow past an array of distributed roughness elements. AIAA J. 45 (8), 1967–1976.Google Scholar
Ruban, A. I. 1984 On the generation of Tollmien–Schlichting waves by sound. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Mekh. Zhidk. Gaza 5, 44–52.Google Scholar
Ruban, A. I. & Kravtsova, M. A. 2013 Generation of steady longitudinal vortices in hypersonic boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 729, 702–731.Google Scholar
Sandham, N. D., Li, Q. & Yee, H. C. 2002 Entropy splitting for high-order numerical simulation of compressible turbulence. J. Comput. Phys. 178, 307–322.Google Scholar
Schneider, S. P. 2008a Effects of roughness on hypersonic boundary-layer transition. J. Spacecr. Rockets 45 (2), 193–209.Google Scholar
Schneider, S. P. 2008b Hypersonic boundary-layer transition on blunt bodies with roughness. J. Spacecr. Rockets 45 (6), 1090–1105.Google Scholar
Subbareddy, P. K., Bartkowicz, M. D. & Candler, G. V. 2014 Direct numerical simulation of high-speed transition due to an isolated roughness element. J. Fluid Mech. 748, 848–878.Google Scholar
Tani, I. & Sato, H. 1956 Boundary-layer transition by roughness element. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 11 (12), 1284–1291.Google Scholar
Thompson, K. W. 1987 Time dependent boundary conditions for hyperbolic systems. J. Comput. Phys. 68, 1–24.Google Scholar
Thompson, K. W. 1990 Time dependent boundary conditions for hyperbolic systems, II. J. Comput. Phys. 89, 439–461.Google Scholar
Tumin, A. & Reshotko, E. 2005 Receptivity of a boundary-layer flow to a three-dimensional hump at finite Reynolds numbers. Phys. Fluids 17, 094101.Google Scholar
Van den Eynde, J. & Sandham, N. D.2014 Numerical simulation of roughness-induced instability growth and transition at Mach 6. AIAA 2014-2499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheaton, B. M. & Schneider, S. P. 2012 Roughness-induced instability in a hypersonic laminar boundary layer. AIAA J. 5 (6), 1245–1256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheaton, B. M. & Schneider, S. P.2013 Instability and transition due to near-critical roughness in a hypersonic laminar boundary layer. AIAA 2013-0084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, A. A.1990 Minimal storage time advancement schemes for spectral methods. Rept. M.S. 202 A-1. NASA Ames Research Centre.Google Scholar
Wu, X. 2001 Receptivity of boundary layers with distributed roughness to vortical and acoustic disturbances; a second-order theory and comparisons with experiments. J. Fluid Mech. 431, 91–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar